Exam 2 Flashcards
Solow Model: limitations
- doesn’t explain LR g
- non-convergence (absolute)
- solow residual: most g due to tech. g
Solow Model: assumptions
- CRS: y=f(k,l)
- dim. returns
- L grows @ n
- assume d
- tech = exogenous
Solow Model: contributions
- svgs does not leaf to LG g%
- convergence (LDCs catch up)
Solow Model: results
- sy > (ntd) ^K -> change ^k >0
- ^K > 0 => sy incr
- g until new steady state
- absolute convergence does not hold
Know the puzzles unexplained by Solow.
a
Similar to above point, know the advances in general of the new endogenous growth theory
- ideas > things
- increasing returns to scale: double inputs => output more than doubles
- (Lucas) human capital => assumes laborers always same but labor improves w/ education & training over time => L increases
- (Romer) technical progress should be endogenous
=> explains how arises and what it is/comes from
=> explained by 2 notions: 1. Solow residual problem 2. non-converge
Lucas’ model assumptions
1) y = f(k,l,hk)
2. assumes external effects
Lucas’ model contributions
1) MPKldc > MPKdc
- > dont see bc HK & educ lvls not high enough to absorb R
Lucas’ model results
- divergence
- > countries with low HC perform below high HC
Lucas’ model limitations
- brain drain
- how help educ./grow?
Lucas model internal and external effects, and why there is a creation of positive externality
why individuals accumulate education:
- internal reason: career, pay w/tuition & time => accumulation
- external reason: learning contributes to societal knowledge - spillover = extra benefit to societ
=> external effect = positive externality –market failure
Why there is policy intervention for education
why individual accumulate education:
- internal reasons: career, pay w/ tuition & time => accumulation
- external reasons: learning contributes to societal knowledge - spillover=extra benefits to society
How policy intervention will not work for LDCs (brain drain)
subsidizing education -> smarter citizens- who may leave
problem = weak labor markets in LDCs => not creating enough employment opportunities (problem not lack of sub. educ.)
LDC response: braindrain > in a drain
Romer: the externality created here.
- ideas are paritally excludable
- > ex. patents (excludable through patents but you can reverse engineer/ideas leak out and partially b/c people can get idea by studying product)
=> govt. intervention
-> positive externality -> adds to stock of knowledge
How ideas are different than things?
- how things used influence output
- ideas are:
1) non-rival - can be used @ same time w/o decr quality
2) partially excludable - patents (govt intervention) but ideas leak out
=> positive externality
how do ideas arise?
- production lines - experiment w/ slight (“obvious”) changes (i.e. rearrange)
- profit motive => intentional actions taken by individuals
- individuals = problem solvers & experimenters EX. mass production/assembly line
incentive to incr ideas in market econ:
- profit
profit from ideas by:
- sell better products
- comparative advantage
- patent new/original idea
Know the broad points of what we have learned from growth models (see Homework 2 where we compare the growth models )
a
Marx’s critique of capitalism (false consciousness, etc.)
- alienation -> repeated boring job
=> alienated from self
=> alienated from others
- false consciousness - workers dont know being alienated, being exploited
workers: rely on incr salaries for motivation more than other reasons
How Marxist-communist-socialism can appeal to LDCs
appeal:
- equality & security to a highly unequal & insecure society
- soviet union industrialized so fast
- centralized power -> authoritarian gov’t possible
How Marxist-communist-socialism can not appeal to LDCs
limitations:
- corruption: “some are more equal”
- not many incentives to work harder -> equal society
- associated with “big brother”
The Marxist influence on development thought (power relations to cultural imperialism)
a
Advantages of market/when market fails. In particular how govts intervene with declining AC curve.
a
What we mean by state capitalism and state capitalism 2.0
- (china, brazil, venezuela): large presence of state
- many of the world’s biggest oil firms are state backed (75% of world’s reserves)
state capitalism: adavantages
- infrastructure, mergers create big companies for emerging markets allows innocation
- mergers incr strength and incr bargaining power vs small private LDC firms
state capitalism: disadvantages
low productivity, state owned enterprises, political corruption
Know all the main points of the big China article, especially those covered in class, I have also added some slides with the main points, also know the expectations model with Deng Xiaoping’s announcement.
a
surplus labor
3 interpretations
- can remove workers w/o decr output
- marginal productivity of labor (MPl) = 0
=> no contribution of additional worker
- MPl = m, subsistence wage [surplus labor]
dualism
- wider concept of 2 contrasting sectors co-existing
- agricultural production function
- agr./industry
double dualism
- formal/informal
- > urban sector - (1) high wage govmt jobs -> formal
or (2) lower wage street vendors -> informal
-> rural sector - (1) township enterprises -> formal
or (2) small landowning farmers -> informal