Exam #2 Flashcards

1
Q

Dialectical materialism

A

Means and relations of production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Epiphenominalism

A

Base vs. Superstructure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Instrumentalism

A

Whose interests does the state serve?
Instrumentalism
“…the State is the form in which the individuals of a ruling class assert their common interests…”
Marx, The German Ideology
“The executive of the modern State is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.”
Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Class

A

Differences from Weber?
Proletariat and Bourgeoisie
Class in itself vs Class for itself
Class consciousness (vs. False consciousness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Labor Theory of value

A

Absolute vs. relative surplus value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lochner v. New York

A

New York’s Bakeshop Act - employers cannot require bakers to work more than 10 hours a day or 60 hours a week
Law was overturned - people can decide how long and when to work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Split Labor Markets

A

Two groups of workers whose price for labor differ for the same work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Split labor markets: Price determinants of labor

A

Standard of living
Information
Political resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Split labor markets: Motives

A

“Target Earners”

Supplementary earners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Players: Business

A

Goal: cheap, docile workforce

Use cheap labor as leverage against expensive labor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Players: Lower-paid labor

A

Goal: Make $$

Politically weak, easily manipulated by business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Players: Higher-paid labor

A

Goal: eliminate or neutralize threat

Threatened by lower-paid labor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“Neutralization”: Exclusion

A

Cheaper labor resides outside the country

Higher-paid “native” labor restricts their entry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“Neutralization”: Exlusivity (“caste”)

A

Occurs when low-paid labor cannot be excluded

“Aristocracy of labor”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Aristocracy of labor

A

Monopolization of valued jobs
Restricted access to education and training
Weaken low-wage group politically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Split labor markets

A

Business supports free market competition
Leads low-paid labor to displace high-paid labor
High-paid labor able to asset its prerogatives against both low-paid labor and business interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Marxism

A

Business engages in “divide and conquer” tactics
Uses low-paid labor to undercut high-paid labor
Encourages racial antagonism as “falls consciousness” to prevent worker solidarity

18
Q

Slavery: Pre-1808

A

Slaveholders exonerated for killing slaves

Fear of losing liberty vs. fear of losing life

19
Q

Slavery: Post-1808

A

End of the trans-Atlantic slave trade
Depended on natural reproduction
Territorial and agricultural expansion

20
Q

“Neutralization” in the North - Exclusion: Indiana Constitution (1851)

A

“No negro or mulatto shall come into, or settle in, the State”

21
Q

“Neutralization” in the North - Exclusion: Illinois “Black Law” (1853)

A

Prohibited black immigration into the state

22
Q

Theories of race relations: Marxism

A

Racial caste system in the antebellum South
Paternalistic race relations
Black codes of the immediate postbellum era

23
Q

Theories of race relations: Split labor market

A

Laws restricting black competition in antebellum North
Rise of Jim Crow segregation in the South
Reinforced by ideology of biological racism

24
Q

Jim Crow laws 1880s-1964

A

Intense competition between white and black workers

Denied voting rights to African Americans

25
Q

Legalized segregation

A

1887: Florida
1888: Mississippi
1889: Texas
1890: Louisiana
1891: Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Georgia

26
Q

Marxism theory of race relation

A

Capitalist class was NOT responsible for segregation during the industrial era

27
Q

Split Labor Market theory of race relation

A
Efforts to exclude blacks arose out of the white working class
Capitalists encouraged free market competition between black and white labor
28
Q

Mobility: Circulation

A

“Zero sum” (fixed number of positions)

Replacement and reshuffling

29
Q

Mobility: Structural

A

Economic expansion or contraction

Job creation or losses

30
Q

Decentralization

A

The “suburbanization” of businesses

31
Q

De-industrialization

A

Shift in production from goods to services

32
Q

Relocation

A

Manufacturing jobs move offshore

33
Q

Automation

A

“Technological unemployment”

34
Q

Paradox of unionization: Early industrial

A

Unions bad for blacks

Exclusionary

35
Q

Paradox of unionization: Late industrial

A

Unions better for blacks

Egalitarianism

36
Q

Paradox of unionization: Post-industrial

A

Unions good for a few, bad for the masses

Unintended consequences

37
Q

Working-class barriers to corporate jobs

A

Relocation
Education
Unionization

38
Q

Middle-class success finding white-collar jobs

A

Affirmative action

Government Sector

39
Q

Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971)

A

Jobs requiring diplomas, credentials test scores etc must show that they are “reasonably related” to job.
White workers with higher and lower test scores showed no significant differences in job performance
“institutionalized discrimination” is unconstitutional
Disparate impact vs. disparate intent

40
Q

University of California v. Bakke (1978)

A

UC-Davis reserved 16 places in each entering class for 100 “qualified” minorities
Allan Bakke’s GPA and test scores exceeded those of minority students that were admitted - he was rejected
Split decision
4: Any racial quota is unconstitutional
4: Use of race in admissions decisions is permissible
1: Quotas are unconstitutional, but race may be used as one factor among many

41
Q

Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)

A

University of MI used a 150 point scale to rank applicants - 100 points needed to be admitted
Blacks, Hispanics, Indians got an automatic 20 point bonus
Perfect SAT worth 12 points
Ruled unconstitutional in a 6-3 vote
Under this system, “the diversity contributions of applicants cannot be individually assessed.”

42
Q

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)

A

No quota based affirmative action policy used by MI law school is constitiuional
5-4 decision in court
School benefits from a diverse student body, race may be used as a qualitative “plus” factor