Exam 2 (2) Flashcards

1
Q

List the elements of Negligence as discussed in the lecture

A
  • Duty to care
  • Breach of duty
  • Injury
  • Causation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mr. Smith walks into an emergency room at a county hospital because his right arm is broken with the bone protruding through the skin… there is a clear case of battery against the LPN: true or false?

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mr. Smith walks into an emergency room at a county hospital because his right arm is broken with the bone protruding through the skin… Mr. Smith has a cause of action against the physician for slander: true or false?

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mr. Smith walks into an emergency room at a county hospital because his right arm is broken with the bone protruding through the skin… Mr. Smith has a cause of action against the LPN for false imprisonment: true or false?

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Provide the definition of tort as discussed in the lecture

A

A civil wrong which the law provides a remedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Do you have the legal duty to assist a stranger who falls in front of you on the sidewalk and injures themselves? Answer true if yes and Answer false if no.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Would a physician be liable for negligence if he fails to provide medical assistance to a stranger who falls and injures himself on the sidewalk in front of the physician? Answer true if yes and answer false if no.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Deviation from the “standard to care” is considered a breach of duty, relative to the tort of negligence. True or False?

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A surgeon may preform a surgery in a completely new, novel and untested manner, thus, deviating from the standard of care and still not be liable for negligence if the patient does not suffer injury from the surgery.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Assumption of the risk is knowing that a danger exists and voluntarily accepting the risk by exposing oneself to it, aware that harm might occur.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A lawsuit which alleges fraud by the defendant may be successful if the plaintiff provides evidence that the defendant made a false statement, known by the defendant to be false at the time it was made, and it was made for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to act in reliance theron, then the plaintiff acted in reliance on the correctness of the statement, but there is no damage to the plaintiff caused by the plaintiff’s acting in the reliance upon the defendant’s statement.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which of the following is NOT an element of intentional infliction of emotional distress?

A

The emotional distress caused physical injury to the plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Truth is a defense to claim of defamation.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

No evidence of an intent to cause harm is necessary to prove tort of battery.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assault is defined as:

A

A deliberate threat coupled with the apparent present ability to do physical harm to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A man may be liable for fraud if he makes an untrue statement, but he did not know the statement was untrue when he made it, then someone acted in reliance on his statement and was damaged by their reliance on that statement.

A

False

17
Q

Regarding legal negligence, foreseeability is used to analyze the existence of the elements of causation, as well as duty.

A

True

18
Q

A duty to care, relative to the law of negligence, may arise from or be created by:

A

A statute

19
Q

To prove a claim for battery the plaintiff must produce evidence of harmful or offensive touching of the plaintiff’s body.

A

True

20
Q

A “duty to care”, relative to a claim of negligence, can never be established or imposed on a person based solely on the relationship of the parties.

A

False

21
Q

The term used to define the spoken form of defamation is:

A

Slander

22
Q

A person may be liable for false imprisonment if he/she attempts to prevent another person from leaving a room by standing outside the open door with a sword in hand, pointing the sword at the opening of the door and telling the person in the room that they cannot leave the room.

A

True

23
Q

A “statute of limitations” refers to a statute that limits the time in which a defendant must answer a complaint.

A

False

24
Q

Res Ispa Loquitur means:

A

The thing speaks for itself

25
Q

As part of what a plaintiff must prove to recover for damages for false imprisonment, he must be aware of the confinement and have no reasonable means of escape. True or false?

A

True

26
Q

A woman may be liable for the tort of assault if she swings a sword which passes inches from a sleeping man’s face, then runs from the room.

A

False

27
Q

Contributory negligence occurs when a person does not exercise reasonable care for his or her own safety, thus contributing to his or her own injury.

A

True

28
Q

If a person is restrained and physically bound to his bed, while he is unconscious, but the restraints are removed before the patient is conscious, the person who applied the restraint may be liable for which of the following torts.

A

Battery

29
Q

The manufacturers of an anesthesia machine designed and intended the machine to be used to assist in the administration of anesthesia gas during surgery…. the manufacturer of the anesthesia machine could be liable for the injuries under which of the following theories or claims?

A

Strict liability

30
Q

In order to prove the tort of assault there must be evidence of bruising, red marks or other indications of physical contact on the victim/plaintiff. true or false?

A

False

31
Q

The theory of Res Ispa Loquitur could be invoked during a trial based on evidence that a man was admitted to a hospital with no burns on his buttocks and 22 hours later, after having been in no other place and under the direct care of the hospital, has burns on his buttocks where a heating pad had been placed. true or false?

A

True

32
Q

The tort of false imprisonment must include evidence of actual touching of the plaintiff by the defendant, such as but not limited to restraining the plaintiff with handcuffs or rope, etc.

A

False