Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

A statistical relationship between two variables; when one variable changes, the other tends to change as well.

A

Correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A relationship where one variable directly affects or influences the other.

A

Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

refers to the accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).

A

Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the extent to which the data or results of a research method represent the intended variable

A

Measurement validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A test in which most people would agree that the test items appear to measure what the test is intended to measure would have strong face validity.

For example, a mathematical test consisting of problems in which the test taker has to add and subtract numbers may be considered to have strong face validity

A

Face validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

assesses whether a test is representative of all aspects of the construct. To produce valid results, the content of a test, survey or measurement method must cover all relevant parts of the subject it aims to measure.
• For example, a test to receive your driver’s license would not be valid if it had questions assessing pilot competency.

A

Content validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the extent to which results from a study can be applied (generalized) to other situations, groups, or events.

A

External validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the degree of confidence that the causal relationship you are testing is not influenced by other factors or variables.

A

Internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

refers to the consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions).

A

Reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the measure vary across time (i.e., weight). Will the same variables have similar results in future samples and research?
• For example, if I am measuring student safety in a survey. Would you be able to use the same safety survey next year?

A

Stability reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does the measure do across groups (i.e., political opinion/rights). How will these measures differ when put against different samples? Should there be differences? Why or why not?
• For example, if I am measuring student safety in a survey, would you be able to use the same safety survey for freshman and seniors?

A

Representative reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Do other academics agree that your measure is reliable? A measure of consistency used to evaluate the extent to which different experts agree with the measure.
• For example, if I am measuring student safety in a survey, I would want other academics who have also measured this concept to agree that this my survey is measuring safety adequately.

A

Inter- rater reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

taking abstract ideas (like “happiness,” “stress,” or “social justice”) and clearly defining what they mean in the context of your study.

A

Conceptualization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the step where abstract concepts (like “police legitimacy” or “recidivism”) are translated into specific indicators or variables that can be measured.

A

Operationalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ideas or phenomena that are being studied (i.e., crime)

A

Concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The measures/categories used to research the concepts (i.e., murder)

A

Variable

17
Q

The specific, observable, and measurable question(s) used to make the variable (i.e., arrest or dead bodies)

A

Indicator

18
Q

a variable that stands alone and isn’t changed by the other variables you are trying to measure.

A

Independent

19
Q

result or outcome assumed by the independent variable.

A

Dependent

20
Q

element which is constant and unchanged throughout the course of the investigation.

A

Control

21
Q

third variable in a study examining a potential cause-and-effect relationship that is unaccounted for.

A

Extraneous (confounding)

22
Q

the data can only be categorized. You can categorize your data by labelling them in mutually exclusive groups, but there is no order between the categories.
o Examples: city of birth, gender, car brands, and marital status

A

Nominal

23
Q

the data can be categorized and ranked. You can categorize and rank your data in an order, but you cannot say anything about the intervals between the rankings.
o Examples: Satisfaction, steak rareness, and Likert-type questions (e.g., very dissatisfied to very satisfied)

A

Ordinal

24
Q

the data can be categorized and ranked, and evenly spaced. You can categorize, rank, and infer equal intervals between neighboring data points, but there is no true zero point.
o Examples: IQ and temperature

A

Interval

25
Q

the data can be categorized, ranked, evenly spaced and has a natural zero. You can categorize, rank, and infer equal intervals between neighboring data points, and there is a true zero point.
o Example: Height, age, and weight

A

Ratio

26
Q

is the group of elements which has common characteristics. It is a collection of observations we would like to make inferences about.

A

Population

27
Q

is the subset of a population

A

Sample

28
Q

A collection of samples from the population is a sampling. In other words, sampling units are an overlapping collection of elements from the population

A

Sampling

29
Q

A list of the items or people forming a population from which a sample is taken.

A

Sampling frame

30
Q

Every element in the sample population has an equal chance of being selected. A sampling method is biased if every member of the population doesn’t have an equal likelihood of being in the sample.
Different Types of Probability Sampling
• Random Sampling
• Stratified Sampling
• Systematic Sampling
• Cluster Sampling

A

Probability sampling

31
Q

It is a method of sampling in which every element of the universe has an equal probability of being chosen. For example, choosing an individual from a lottery. The advantage of this method is free from personal bias, and the universe gets fairly represented by samples.

A

Random sampling

32
Q

The population is broken down into non-overlapping groups. In other words, strata (elements within the subgroups that are homogenous or heterogeneous). Then random samples are taken from each stratum, so the entire population is represented. The advantage of this method is it covers all the elements of the population. But there is a possibility of bias at the time of classification of the population.

A

Stratified sampling

33
Q

Samples are selected from the population according to a pre-determined rule. In other words, every nth element is selected from the population as a sample. Arrange all the elements in a sequence and then select the samples from the population at regular intervals.

A

Systemic sampling

34
Q

The population is broken down into many different clusters, and then clusters or subgroups are randomly selected. For example, clusters are of different ages, sex, locations, etc.

A

Cluster sampling

35
Q

Purposive sampling is also known as judgment sampling. Samples are selected based on the purpose or intention of the research. The method is flexible to allow the inclusion of those items in the sample which are of special significance.

A

Judgement sampling

36
Q

is one of the easiest sampling methods. Samples selection is based on availability as well as the selection of convenient samples for the researcher.

A

Convenience sampling

37
Q

It is one type of stratified sampling, where samples are collected in each subgroup until the desired quota is met. The proportion of this sample does not match the proportion of the group to the population.

A

Quota sampling

38
Q

or referral sampling is the method famous in medical and social science surveys where the population is unknown and difficult to get the sample. Hence researchers will take help from the existing elements to refer the others as samples who can fit in the population. Since it is based on referrals, there is a chance of bias.

A

Snowball sampling