Exam 2 Flashcards
What are sports and games?
Meaningless question because difference between sports and games is subjective
So we should rephrase to ask what are the social and cultural aspects of sports?
Perspectives on sport
Sport as play: emphasizes the spontaneous, instructed, and imaginative aspects of sports, fostering creativity and enjoyment
Sport as ritual: highlights the symbolic and cultural significance of sports, often involving community participation, creates shared experiences, and invokes a sense of collective identity
Sports as games: focuses on structured, rule-based nature of sports, requiring strategic thinking, skill development…
Sport as society: drawing connections between sport and political, economic, social, and cultural forces within the broader society
DJ Shub
Games: Dancing
Ritual: food, regalia
Society: a broader economy develops around this
What are issues for study of ancient sports
Ivory towers: tendency for academics to see sports as frivolous. But Smit argues that sports can be a window onto society
Tendency to view ancients as different from us moderns. So researchers sometimes see sport as a recent phenomenon
And sports found in the past are sometimes reframed to spirituality or ritual event. This has to do with capitalism and consumption
Methodologies: artifacts
Neighborhood definition
From Pacifico integrative residential landscapes within broader dense populations OR a residential zone that has considerable face to face interaction
Why do neighborhoods form?
Ultimate causes: (deep patterns of social interaction); neighborhoods are stress management because our biology limits our social networking because of memory limitations and stress about how many people we want to know
proximate causes: day to day realities of their formation
sociality/defense, admin, and control/surveillance
Types of Neighborhood formation
top-down: driven by legal, central authority
bottom-up: example is ethnic enclaves
Caylan Peru is case study of
neighborhoods
Caylan, Peru
location?
events in time period?
city features?
neighborhoods
between coast and River valley
Chavin de Huantar starts to decline (supported by declines in Chavin ceramic)
and more defensive features in Central Andes, more interpersonal violence = instability when Caylan formed
irrigated valley but city on plain above
uniform street size
many defensive towers and defensive walls
llama caravans
trade point because mountains and coast
neighborhoods were in multifamily housing; more neighborhood scale because its larger than 1 household
had walls like gated communities
house organization shows that if hosting people in the plaza, then they can’t see the living corridors *things were separate
Cahokia neighborhoods
Betzenhauser: L and T shaped structures for medicine bundles and for non-human things which shows cosmology of Cahokia because they believe that nonliving things can be alive BUT were not residential because no trash from eating and pooping
Teotihuacan
size
location
fire ceremony
no evidence of what?
neighborhoods
tunnels
one of largest city in America’s
central Mexico
fire ceremony that shows that the fire is coming from Teo
no evidence of individual rulers so a more equal large city
neighborhoods were basic social units with dormitory, storeroom, kitchen, etc. and a ritual courtyard to celebrate family patron god
Ethnic barrios: on the periphery and had different food, murals, and funerary practices which are similar to Oaxaca *people moved from other cities to Teo to be a part of craft sector to make obsidian and jewelry
tunnels from temple to temple –> highlights level of engineering
Teotihuacan is what civilization?
Aztec
Why is trade important?
Material record of interaction
3 perspectives on trade
adaptationist perspectives
political perspectives
commercial perspectives
do pots equal people?
no
adaptationist perspective on trade
way to solve a problem (ex: 1 grow lots of beans, so I will trade with your lots of corn to have a more complete diet)
political perspectives on trade
trade is how elites in society gain power (Inca)
commercial perspectives on trade
trade is a part of human nature so there aren’t really questions about it
homo economicus
human economist (we are all people that are trying to max or gain at all times)
3 economic forms of trade
reciprocity
redistribution
market exchange
reciprocity trade
gift exchange
2 individuals or groups pass goods back and forth with the goal to create, maintain, or strengthen social relationships
*not about the gift itself but more about how it affects social relationships
redistribution trade
central point and goods move to point and goods move out (point probable factory or storage)
Incan storehouses
market exchange trade
forces of supply and demand determine costs and prices
goods or services are sold for money which is used to buy other goods
ultimate goal of acquiring more money and more goods
govern many goods of our society
hau of the gift
spirit of the gift
see the gifts as obligations not necessarily generosity, because you can’t keep the taonga (present)
4 approaches to detect markets in the past
contextual: inferring a market on logical inference (ex: looking for markets because is the most efficient way to supply people)
spatial: inferring a market on spatial patterns (see if goods travel far distances)
configurational: directly inferring a market
distributional: inferring a market based on household activities (looking at consumption rather than production)
What is commercialization?
what could be bought or sold on the market according to legal, political, or moral beliefs of a society
ex: Aztec societies have markets but land cannot be commercialized/sold
formalism/modernist view on trade
trade is universal and there is continuity; trade is a fundamental aspect of human nature with quantitative modeling; markets are everywhere
Substantivist/Primitivist view on trade
- Particular
- Ruptures (development of capitalism is rupture in human existence, so we can’t apply our capitalistic markets to the past)
- Cultural
- “Embedded”
- Qualitative
- Household scale
- True markets only recently
(capitalism)
critique is that it is “othering” the past
What is a political economy?
expansive vs city-states examples
How does power affect the distribution of resources within a society? and vice versa
Expansive empire: Aztec, Inca, Roman
city-states: Mayan and Greek
Aztec economy
nature of commerce?
commodity trade at marketplace
not capitalist (no land or labor commercialization)
difficult transportation costs because no horses, cows, or domesticated animals
commodity trade at marketplace:
“Center of Aztec life”
rotating cycles of goods 5,9,13,20 day cycles depending on distance
^as a way to control resources
similar patterns across Aztec empire
Case study: Otumba
typical Aztec town
beads, pottery, obsidian
temple with elite residences, plaza, marketplace
neighborhoods organized by crafts and household production
provides a window into scale by good type, allows to a perspective on class differences
Incan empire economies
no centralized marketplaces/trading
greater state admin of the economy
Incan state symbolically and materially controlled right to labor or “taxes” through massive feasts
2 types of finance: wealth (labor goods like gold or cloth) OR staple finance (ag foodstuffs)
Incan case study for economies
Huanico
hills are lined with small buildings for storage of food
*Incan controlled economy by efficient roads whereas Aztec get around transportation costs by cyclic markets