Exam 2 Flashcards
Mendels Law of Segregation
2 alleles of each gene separate/segregate during gamete formation, and then unite at random (1 from each parent) at fertilization
- MI separates homologs; then MII separates sisters. Each gamete ends up with 1 copy of each allele
What happens in meiosis that underlies law of segregation?
Homologous chromosomes align in metaphase I and segregate into separate daughter cells
Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment
During gamete formation, different pairs of alleles segregate independently of each other
50% chance of receiving alleles from mother vs father
what happens in meiosis that underlies law of IA?
Homologous chromosomes align in MetaphaseI with independent orientation; the orientation of 1 tetrad does not influence the orientation of another
independent assortment on same vs different chromosomes
- alleles on different chromosomes = always independently assort
- alleles on the same chromosome may/may not independently assort
independent assortment on the same chromosomes
2 alleles on the same chromosome will assort into the same gamete unless crossing over swaps one onto the homologous chromosomes
therefore, IA on the same chromosome may or may not occur
test cross
cross recessive genotype with mystery genotype
- all dominant –> homozygote dom
- half dominant –> heterozygote dom
why do a test cross?
figure out the genotype of an individual
true-breeding/pure-breeding
homozygous individuals whose line produces the same phenotype when selfed 100% of the time
**can assume genotype is homozygous
how to figure out which is the dominant individual?
look at heterozygous
-cross 2 pure-breeding individuals to get all heterozygous F1 generation and analyze the phenotypes
monohybrid self cross
heterozygotes of 1 gene crossed with each other
Ex/ Aa x Aa
1:2:1 genotypic ratio
3:1 phenotypic ratio
/
alleles on different homologs of the same chromosomes
Ex/ A/a
;
alles on different chromosomes
Ex/ A/a;B/b
dihybrid test cross
2 genes controlling 2 traits
-heterozygotes crossed with recessive homozygotes
Ex/ A/a;B/b x a/a;b/b
genotypic: 1:1:1:1
phenotypic: 1:1:1:1
dihybrid self cross
selfing of dihybrid
genotypic: 9:3:3:1
phenotypic: 9:3:3:1
9 - both dom
3 - 1 dom; 1 rec
3 - 1 rec; 1 dom
1 - both rec
product rule
AND
- the probability that 2 or more independent events occurring together is the product of the probabilities that each will occur by itself
sum rule
OR
- the probabilities of 2 mutually-exclusive events occurring is the sum of their individual probabilities
a scientific hypothesis makes — predictions and is —-.
testable and is falsifiable.
*null hypothesis must make a testable prediction.
ex/ IA will occur.
null hypothesis
there is no significant difference between the observed and expected frequencies
must be very certain that you can reject the null hypothesis
5%
chi-square tests
determine p-value using a formula
total = (observed - expected)^2 /expected
compare values in chart
p value
represents the probability that the null hypothesis is TRUE
p > 0.05
fail to reject the null hypothesis
p < 0.05
reject the null hypothesis with 95% certainty
- there is a greater than 95% chance that the null hypothesis is not true
degrees of freedom
the number of values observed/expected minus 1
how to find expected values for chi square?
look at total and use ratio expected based on the type of cross
ex/ monohybrid self cross = 3:1
out of 400
300 and 100 are expected values
genes controlled by single genes…
display characteristic inheritance patterns
*though most traits are not controlled by a single gene
genetic diseases
- typically involve 2 possible alleles: “disease” and “wild-type”
autosomal recessive disorders
- males and females equally affected
- unaffected individuals can have affected children via heterozygous carriers
- can skip generations
- rare
- becomes more common with inbreeding
rareness in diseases stipulation
when discussing diseases, you can assume these traits are rare so people entering the pedigree do NOT carry the disease allele
- unless you have info to suggest otherwise
why does disease become more common with inbreeding?
may be rare in the general population, but may not be rare in family –> so the homozygote recessive genotype becomes more common
tay-sachs symptoms
- affects babies a few months old
- lose vision and react abnormally when startled
- paralysis
- deafness
- seizures
- inability to breath/swallow
tay-sachs causes
- healthy neuron lysosomes act as the waste processing center of the cell
- With TS, lysosome enzymes cannot properly break down fatty cell products (gangliosides).
- Products build up and destroy cells
- recessive autosomal disease
tests for pregancy with genetic counselors
carrier test of parents (genotypes)
prenatal/preimplantation tests
PGD
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
- blastomere from invitro fertilized embryos are removed and tested for disease gene
- embryos with disease are discarded/donated to science
- embryos without are implanted or frozen
autosomal dominant disorders
- males and females are equally affected
- affected individuals always have an affected parent (no heterozygous carriers bc they are affected too)
- does not skip generations
huntington’s disease
rare, fatal, degenerative neurological disease caused by a dominant disease allele
- start showing symptoms in 40s
- death within 15 years
- mutation in Huntingtin gene
- Huntington’s aggregates in neurons, shaking, personality changes
x-linked inheritance rules
- males inherit Y from their father and MUST inherit X from their mother
- females inherit one X from father and one X from mother
x-linked recessive disorders
- males more frequently affected
- never transmitted from fathers to daughters
- All sons of affected mothers will also be affected by the trait
- can “skip generations” via female carriers
x-linked dominant disorders
- females more frequently affected
- ALL of the daughters and NONE of the sons of affected fathers have the trait
- does not “skip generations”
penetrance
the percentage of individuals with a particular genotype that demonstate the expected phenotype
complete penetrance
100%
incomplete penetrance
1-99%
penetrance calculations over or underestimate?
overestimate
- there could be other nonpenetrant individuals that we are not certain about
- the demoninator is larger so the overall fraction/percentage will be smaller than originally estimated
variable expressivity
for individuals with the same genotype, there is a range of phenotype severity/expression
** the degree with which a genotype is expressed as a phenotype (how much phenotype is shown)
complete dominance
the heterozygous phenotype is the same as homozygous dominant
incomplete dominance
the heterozygous phenotype is intermediate between the two homozygotes
codominance
the heterozygous phenotype is a mizture of the 2 homozygotes
– aspects of both homozygotes are shown
incomplete and codominance
the same genotypic but different phenotypic ratios as complete dominance
monomorphic traits
have single “wild type” allele
variant alleles
- rare (<1%)
- classified as mutant
polymorphic traits
have multiple common allele variants
- There is no single wild type allele
trait classifications are NOT static
- classifications can change
- a mutant allele can become a common varient over time or a common varient can be lost from the population