Exam 2 Flashcards
What is international Law?
formed as a result of international customs, treaties, and organizations - that governs relations among or between nations.
What is National Law?
law of a particular nation
What are the Principles of International Law?
International law is the result of attempts to reconcile the need of each country to be the final authority over its own affairs and the desire to benefit from relations with one another.
What are the Sources of International Law?
– International Customs.
– Treaties and International Agreements.
– International Organizations.
What are Common Law Systems?
courts independently develop rules by stare decisis for certain areas of law, not covered by statutory law.
What are Civil Law Systems?
courts independently develop rules by stare decisis for certain areas of law, not covered by statutory law.
What are Islamic Legal Systems?
sharia legal code is based on religious principles that govern a Muslim’s way of life.
What is Comity?
The principle by which one sovereign nation will defer and give effect to the laws and judicial decrees of another sovereign nation
What is the Act of State Doctrine?
– The judicial branch of one sovereign nation will not examine the validity of public acts committed by a recognized foreign government within its own sovereign territory.
– Often invoked to protect expropriation, and confiscation.
What is Sovereign Immunity?
A doctrine immunizing foreign governments and governmental officials from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts under certain conditions.
A foreign state is not immune from U.S. jurisdiction when:
- The foreign state has waived its immunity.
- The foreign state has engaged in “commercial activity” within or outside the U.S. that has a
“direct effect in the United States.” - The foreign state has committed a tort in U.S. or violated certain international laws.
What are the Types of International Business Operations?
- Direct Exporting
- Indirect Exporting
- Agency Relationship with Foreign Firm.
- Distributorship
- Licensing/Franchising
- Manufacturing Abroad
- Investing in a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary or Joint Venture
What are Import Controls?
- Prohibited Goods (e.g., Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917).
- Quotas and Tariffs. Quotas limit the amount of goods that can be imported. Tariffs are taxes upon imports.
- Political Factors (Retaliation).
- Antidumping Duties: less than fair value.
What are the Minimizing Trade Barriers?
– European Union.
– NAFTA.
– CAFTA-DR.
– KORUS-FTA.
What are the International Contracts?
- Choice-of-Language Clause
- Choice of Forum Clause
- Choice of Law Clause
- Force Majeure Clause
- Choice of Payment (Currency) Clause
(If no choice specified, under Hague Convention issue is governed by country where seller is located.)
What are the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention)?
International trade agreements often include arbitration provisions.
– (1) Written or recorded agreement.
– (2) Agreement provides for arbitration.
– (3) One party is not a U.S. citizen.
When are U.S. Antitrust Laws Used?
Applied if foreign conspiracy has substantial effect on U.S. commerce
What is the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
– cannot bribe any high-ranking foreign officials
– does not apply to lower officials (“mordida”)
Who does the Civil Rights Act apply to?
– applies to US companies in the US
– applies to US employees of US companies around the world
– exceptions for foreign companies in US
– exceptions for foreign employees outside US
What is Space Law?
- UN treaties establish registry of objects in space and maintain ownership by parties who
put them there (and potential liability) - No recognition of national sovereignty of any moons or planets in space; therefore, no recognition of any potential private property rights.
You enter into a contract with Misha, a distributor from St. Petersburg, Russia. In your contract, you specify that US law will apply to the interpretation and enforcement of the contract. This would be called a:
a. force majeure clause.
b. choice-of-law clause.
c. choice of language clause
d. forum-selection clause.
e. destination clause.
choice-of-law clause.
James is an American who works in London for a U.S. corporation. After working diligently and
receiving good job evaluations for over four years, James, who is a Muslim, is fired. He believes that his termination is the result of employment discrimination based on his religion. In this case:
a. James can do nothing because the problem occurred outside the United States.
b. Title VII only applies to U.S. citizens working abroad for foreign-owned companies.
c. James cannot bring a Title VII claim because his case involves religion.
d. Title VII applies to U.S. citizens who work for U.S. firms overseas, so he has a cause of action under Title VII.
e. James can recover because of British law, not American law.
Title VII applies to U.S. citizens who work for U.S. firms overseas, so he has a cause of action under Title VII.
Al is trying to buy a car, but the dealer is concerned about Al’s credit. Al calls his uncle Sam to describe his problem. Sam says, “Get that dealer on the line!” and he proceeds to tell the dealer that he will stand behind Al on the loan. “I’ll personally guaranty Al’s payment of every cent!” Sam declares. The dealer makes the loan, but Al fails to pay. Will the dealer be successful in his suit against Sam?
a. No, because the guaranty agreement was not in writing.
b. No, because the dealer must first repossess the car.
c. No, because the agreement was not a suretyship.
d. Yes, because Sam made the promise and the dealer relied on it.
e. Yes, but only if Sam is assigned the authority to repossess the car.
No, because the guaranty agreement was not in writing.
Ted is the owner of Ted’s Restaurant, Inc., a corporation, which owes debts of $300,000 and has assets of only $100,000. There is no possible way for Ted to stay in business, so in order to liquidate the assets and be discharged from the debt Ted must file for bankruptcy under:
a. Chapter 11
b. Chapter 9
c. Chapter 7
d. Chapter 13
e. either c. or d. above
Chapter 7
The type of bankruptcy proceeding used most commonly by corporations is a reorganization under:
a. Chapter 5.
b. Chapter 7.
c. Chapter 11.
d. Chapter 12.
e. Chapter 13.
Chapter 11
Case in Point 11.2
- Karen Goldberg’s husband was killed in a terrorist bombing in Israel.
- She filed a lawsuit against UBS AG in a federal court in New York.
- UBS requested that the case be transferred to a court in Israel.
- The court refused to transfer the case.
- The court’s decision was based on concerns about comity and enforceability.
Case in Point 11.3
- Spectrum Stores, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Citgo Petroleum Corporation in a U.S. court.
- Spectrum alleged that Citgo had conspired with other oil companies to limit production of crude oil and thereby fix the prices of petroleum products sold in the United States.
The U.S. court dismissed the case under the act of state doctrine. - The act of state doctrine is a common law principle that holds that U.S. courts will not question the validity of the official acts of a foreign government performed within its own territory.
- The court reasoned that because Citgo is owned by the Venezuelan government, its actions in Venezuela were covered by the act of state doctrine.
- In other words, the U.S. court could not rule on whether Citgo’s actions were illegal in the United States because the Venezuelan government had the authority to control its own oil reserves and to set its own oil production policies.
Case in Point 11.5
- The plaintiffs, descendants of Jewish art dealers in Frankfurt, sued Germany for the theft of their ancestors’ art collection during the Nazi regime.
- The plaintiffs argued that the art dealers had been forced to sell the collection for much less than its market price.
- Germany claimed immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
- The federal judge disagreed, holding that Germany was not entitled to immunity in this case.
The court’s decision was based on the following findings:
- The plaintiffs’ claims were based on commercial activity, which is not protected under the FSIA.
- Germany’s conduct was “not so closely connected with the exercise of the sovereign functions of the state” as to be immune under the FSIA.
- Germany’s conduct was “not an act performed in the exercise of regular government agency functions.”
- The court’s decision is a significant victory for the plaintiffs and could pave the way for other victims of Nazi art theft to seek justice in U.S. courts.
Case in Point 11.4
- Hamas, a terrorist organization sponsored by Iran, carried out suicide bombings in Jerusalem, killing five people and injuring nearly two hundred.
- American victims of these bombings sued Iran under Section 1605A of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and obtained a judgment of $71.5 million in damages.
- To collect on the judgment, the plaintiffs sued Iran in a federal district court under Section 1610(g) of the FSIA.
- Section 1610(g) allows attachment and execution against the property of foreign sovereigns for certain types of judgments, including judgments for terrorism-related injuries.
- The district court ruled that Iran’s property was immune to attachment and execution under Section 1610(g).
- The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling.
- The plaintiffs appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court’s decision in this case will be closely watched by both parties. If the Court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it could make it easier for victims of terrorism to collect damages from foreign sovereigns. On the other hand, a ruling in favor of Iran would reinforce the principle of sovereign immunity and make it more difficult for victims of terrorism to obtain compensation.
Case in Point 11.2
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Company is a Chinese firm that manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells and related products. Trina Solar (U.S.), Inc. imported these CSPV products into the U.S.
- The U.S. Department of Commerce determined that these imports were subsidized by the Chinese government. The imports were sold in the U.S. at less than fair value.
- The International Trade Commission (ITC) found that the domestic CSPV industry in the U.S. was materially injured by these imports.
- Changzhou and Trina challenged the ITC’s determination at the U.S. Court of International Trade.
- The U.S. Court of International Trade upheld the ITC’s determination and rejected the challenge. Changzhou and Trina subsequently appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Case in Point 11.8
- Juridica Investments, Ltd. (JIL) entered into a financing contract with S & T Oil Equipment & Machinery, Ltd., a U.S. company.
- The contract was signed and performed in Guernsey, a British Crown dependency. The contract included an arbitration clause.
- A dispute arose between JIL and S & T.
JIL initiated arbitration proceedings in Guernsey. S & T filed a lawsuit in a U.S. court regarding the dispute. - JIL filed a motion in the U.S. court to dismiss the lawsuit in favor of arbitration.The U.S. court granted JIL’s
motion to dismiss and favored arbitration. - S & T appealed the decision.
A federal appellate court upheld the decision and mandated arbitration under the New York Convention.
What are Contracts?
A contract is an agreement between two or more parties to perform or to refrain from some act now or in the future enforceable by the courts.
What are the Sources of Contract Law?
– Common Law for all contracts except sales and leases.
– Sale and lease contracts - Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
What is the Objective Theory of Contracts?
- Contracts will be interpreted objectively (looking at the words and the circumstances at the time of
entering into the contract) as interpreted by a reasonable person. - Subjective intent (what I meant to say) will not usually be considered
- Not reading all of terms and conditions is not an excuse
What is the Plain Meaning Rule?
- When a contract is clear and unequivocal, a court will enforce it according to its plain terms, set forth on the face of the instrument.
- There is no need for the court either to consider extrinsic evidence (oral testimony of “what we meant to say”).
What are the Requirements of a Contract?
- Agreement (offer + acceptance)
- Consideration
- Competent Parties
- Lawful Purpose
- Genuine Assent
- Legal Form
What to parties does every contract invlove?
the offeror/ promisor, who makes the offer/promise to perform,
and the offeree/promisee, to whom the offer/promise is made
What is a Bilateral Contract?
- a promise is given in exchange for a promise in return.
- For example: X promises to deliver a car to Y, Y promises to pay X an agreed price.
What is a Unilateral Contract?
- a promise is exchanged only for the offeree’s performance.
- For example: X offers Y $15 if Y will mow X’s yard.
What is an Express Contract?
not yet performed by all parties
What is an Executed Contract?
fully performed by all parties
What is a Quasi-Contract?
A fictional contract imposed on parties by a court in the interests of fairness and justice, typically to prevent the unjust enrichment of one party at the expense of the other.
What is an Agreement?
The process of agreement usually involves two steps: offer + acceptance
What is an Offer?
A promise or commitment to perform or refrain from performing some specified future act made by the offeror.
What is Acceptance?
- Unqualified, unconditional and unequivocal response that indicates agreement to the terms of the offer.
What is Contractual Intent?
- Statements made in anger/jest aren’t offers
- Advertisements are not offer
- Social invitations are not offers
What is Reasonable Definiteness?
- Offer must contain all key terms
- Acceptance does not add any terms
What is the Required Communication to Offeree?
- Must be sent to offeree
- If accepted by someone else, it’s a new offer
What are the rules for E-Contracts?
Offer and Acceptance may occur by email
* Documents may be attached to emails
* Exchanged emails may be offer/acceptance
What happens when the Offer is Terminated?
The communication of an effective offer gives the offeree the power to transform the offer into a binding legal
agreement, or contract
What is Revocation?
Offeror takes it back
What is Rejection?
Once offeree says no, can’t go back on offer; it’s dead
What is a Counter-Offer?
- “Mirror image rule”
- if anything is changed in offer, it is now a counteroffer
What is Lapse of Time?
“Has to be accepted by 5pm on 10/10/2023”
What is Destruction of Subject Matter?
” Offers to buy house, it burns down”
What is Death or Incompetence?
“Just because you died doesn’t mean you get out of contract”
When offeror dies before the offer is accepted, what happens?
The offer is terminated
When offeror dies after the offer is accepted, what happens?
The offer is binding on the offeror’s estate
What is the “Mailbox Rule”?
- An acceptance becomes effective upon being placed in the mailbox by the offeree.
- revocation of an offer becomes effective upon its receipt by the offeree; an acceptance becomes
effective upon its dispatch by the offeree to the offeror
What are Click-On Agreements?
Click “I agree” online even if terms are never read
What are Shrink-Wrap Agreements?
- Contract terms disclosed after sale inside the box
- Can be construed as “additional terms”
What is the Federal E-Sign Act of 2000?
No signature may be denied legal effect because it is in electronic form
What is the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act?
- Digital signatures with encryption keys
- Signature dynamics
- Smart cards
What are the Elements of Consideration?
- Consideration must be given in order to make a contract legally binding
- Must be something of value to be a “bargained for exchange”
- Consideration must induce the party to incur a legal detriment and/or provide a legal benefit to the
other party sufficient to induce that party to commit itself. - The adequacy of consideration is not usually taken into account
What is Legally Sufficient Consideration?
- Promising to do something that the promisor has no prior legal duty to do.
- Performing an action that the promisor is not otherwise obligated to undertake.
- Refraining from exercising a legal right which the promisor is entitled to exercise.
What is Pre-Existing Legal Duty?
under most circumstances, a promise to do (or refrain from doing) what one already has a legal duty to do (or refrain from doing) does not constitute legally sufficient consideration.
What is Past Consideration?
promises made in return for acts or events that have already taken place are unenforceable for lack of sufficient consideration.
What is Accord and Satisfaction?
- an agreement between the parties to accept different performance than originally promised.
- A debtor offers to pay, and a creditor agrees to accept a lesser amount than was originally owed on the
claim (can only used when amount is in dispute).
What is a Release?
agreement whereby one party forfeits its rights to pursue a legal claim against another party.
Releases are generally binding if they are:
- Given in good faith
- Stated in writing
- Accompanied by consideration
What is Promissory Estoppel?
Sometimes when a promisor makes a clear and definite promise on which the promisee justifiably relies, the promisor is bound by the promise, even if it was insufficient to form the basis of a valid, legally binding contract.
What are the Requirements for Promissory Estoppel?
- The promise was clear and definite.
- The promisee justifiably relied on the promise.
- The promisee’s reliance was substantial and definite.
- Enforcing the promise will avoid unjust enrichment.
What is Contractual Capacity?
- The minimum mental capacity required by law for a party who enters into a contractual agreement to be boundby it.
- Common law recognizes three classes of persons who are generally not considered to have sufficient capacity
to be bound by their contracts.
What is the Contractual Capacity for Minors?
- contract is voidable at option of minor (must disaffirm)
- minor is required to return consideration (what’s left of it)
- cosignor or guarantor is liable on contract
What is the Contractual Capacity for Parent’s Liability?
- As a general rule, parents are not liable for the contracts made by their minor children unless parent co-signed
the obligation - Minor may disaffirm or avoid contract anytime up until a reasonable time after reaching majority
- Minor may ratify contract upon reaching majority
What is the Contractual Capacity for Mentally Impaired or Incompetent Persons?
- Voidable if contract is made while party is mentally incompetent.
- Obligation to return consideration upon avoidance/disaffirmation.
- May be ratified after becoming competent.
What is the Contractual Capacity for Intoxicated Persons?
- Voidable if contract is made while party is intoxicated.
- No difference if voluntary or involuntary.
- May be ratified after becoming sober.
What is the Contractual Capacity for Women?
- Married women had no contractual capacity at common law.
- Only husband could enter into contracts.
- Abolished in Texas in 1960’s.
What are Contracts Contrary to Statute?
statutes sometimes proscribe certain types of contracts, contract terms, and/or contractual provisions.
What are Usury Statutes?
Virtually every state has a statute that sets the maximum rate of interest that can legally be charged for different types of transactions, including ordinary loans.
What are the 3 Elements of Gambling?
- Consideration
- Chance
- Prize
What are Blue Laws?
Some states and localities prohibit engaging in certain business activities on Sundays.
What are Licensing Statutes?
All states require that members of certain professions – attorneys, doctors, and architects, etc. – be licensed by
the state.
What does it mean for statutes to be Regulatory in Nature?
Contract with unlicensed person may be unenforceable
What does it mean for statutes to just Produce Revenue?
Contract with unlicensed person not affected.
What are Restrictive Covenants?
are generally permitted when they are ancillary to an otherwise enforceable contract for the sale of a business or for employment.
What are Unconscionable Contracts?
Contracts that require one party, as a consequence of disproportionate bargaining power, to accept terms that are unfairly burdensome to that party and unfairly beneficial to the party with greater bargaining power.
What are the Statute of Frauds?
statute which requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be enforceable.
- Some contracts considered important enough that their terms must be memorialized in writing to
ensure reliable evidence of their existence and their terms
M - marriage
Y - not performable in one year
L - involving an interest in land
E - made by an executor to pay debts
G - for sale of goods over $500
S - surety agreement
What are the exceptions for the Statute of Frauds?
- Partial Performance
- Custom orders of Goods
- Acceptance of Delivery
What is the Sufficiency of the Writing?
- A writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought.
- A confirmation, invoice, sales slip, check, or fax, or any combination thereof.
- Several documents which, in combination, provide the terms for an agreement.
What is the Parol Evidence Rule?
A court will not admit evidence of the parties’ prior negotiations, prior oral or written agreements, or contemporaneous oral agreements if that evidence contradicts or varies the terms of a written contract.
What is Privity of Contract?
- As a general rule, only the parties to a contract owe any duties and enjoy any rights arising from the contract.
- The exceptions are assignment and delegation
What is Assignment?
a party to the contract (the assignor) transfers his rights to some third party (assignee)
What is Delegation?
party to the contract frees himself from duties by having a third party perform the duties.
What are the Liabilities of Parties?
- The assignor remains liable if the assignee fails to perform.
- The other party may sue both the assignor and the assignee.
- Assignee acquires no greater rights than held by assignor
What are Duties that may not be Delegated?
- Performance depends on the skill of the obligor.
- Special trust has been placed in the obligor.
- Performance by a third party will alter the expectation of the duty contract.
- Contract expressly prohibits delegation.
What is Notice of Assignment?
- The third party (the assignee) should notify the obligor of the assignment once an assignment has been made.
- The assignment is effective immediately, whether or not notice is given to the obligor.
- But the obligor is protected unless notice is received
What is the Third-Party Beneficiary?
- The law distinguishes between intended and incidental third-party beneficiaries.
- Only intended beneficiaries acquire actionable legal rights in a contract
Who is the Intended Beneficiary?
- A third party for whose benefit a contract is formed.
- Examples include life insurance, labor contracts, etc
Who is the Incidental Beneficiary?
A third party who benefits from the performance of a contract, but whose benefit was not the reason the contract was formed.
(Examples include construction contracts, etc.)
A bilateral contract is one in which:
a. A promise is given in return for an act.
b. A third party guarantees the promise of one of the parties.
c. Two promises are exchanged.
d. A unilateral contract accompanies an exchange of promises.
e. The contract is between two parties.
Two promises are exchanged.
When the offeror dies before an offer has been accepted, the offer:
a. May be rejected by the surviving spouse of the offeror.
b. May be accepted by the surviving spouse of the offeror.
c. May be accepted by the guardian for any minor children of the offeror.
d. Is automatically terminated by the death of the offeror.
e. Is binding on the offeror’s estate
Is automatically terminated by the death of the offeror.