Exam 2 Flashcards
Chomsky (e.g., “language acquisition device”)
- (contrasted with BF Skinner) → Skinner’s approach is based off of the environment that the child is in
- Nativist Approach/model → language arises from the child
- Children are born with the device, as they grow they use innate capacity to learn language
Language characteristics (e.g., productive and regular, hierarchical)
- A communication system that demonstrates productivity(finite parts create infinite ideas,) regularity (system of rules), hierarchical (organized into parts like morphemes, sentences, etc)
- These things can be used to create an infinite combination of communications, and we learn it hierarchically
Morpheme and phoneme
Parts of the hierarchy of language, morpheme=unit of word, phoneme=sound
Nativist perspective of language
Chompsky - u born with it (innate)
Learning theory perspective
- BF Skinner
- language is a learned pattern of behaviors unique to a culture. Not innate
Early phonological development (e.g., number of speech sounds)
Learning to distinguish speech sounds (there are over 200 speech sounds)
Categorical perception and hearing “pauses” between words
- Ability of infants to hear strings of words and make distinction between end of one word and start of another.
- There is no actual longer pause between words, infants are just immersed in the language to recognize it
Young infants and perception of foreign languages
- We are born with ability to hear a broad range of phonemes, and environment selects out which we can hear
- young infants are actually better at hearing different phonemes from different cultures, brain has not yet pruned the connections we don’t need
Infant directed speech
Baby talk, “motherese”
Intersubjectivity (e.g., joint referencing)
- Idea that there is a triangle between the child, scientist, and object (in this case the bunny) but there is this development as a child sees a thing and becomes able to get someone’s attention and say look at this!!
- Between 9-12mo
“natural pedagogy” of parents/caregivers with infants (e.g., “ostentatious utterances”)
- naming, pointing, emphasizing objects and activities…”ostentacious utterances” including “look at…” and “are you…”
- Hart and Risley (1995) - higher SES=487 utterances per hour; low SES=187 utterances per hour; signif discrepancy in language input by CA=4
Overextensions and underextensions of words
When a child uses a word too specific for something else (not all flying things are birds, not all utensils are spoons )
Fast mapping
- Child has learned how to learn
- You know they are at that stage (3-4) because they keep asking you tons and tons of questions
- Around 18mo, infants appear to understand that objects have names, setting the stage for rapid vocab growth. They may grow their vocab from about 50 words at 18 mo to 10,000 by 6 years
Principles of children’s language learning:
1. whole object assumption
2. mutual exclusivity principle
3. taxonomic principle
- A dog is a dog, including the ears, the nose, the tail, etc.
- Notion that if this thing is an eraser, another thing that looks very different is probably not going to have that same name
- In fast mapping stage, they start to understand that pretty much everything has a name
Structure of syntax
Formation of utterances by combining words (AKA sentence structure)
Pragmatic language development
- accurate perception and understanding of speech
- production of intelligible speech
- appreciation of cultural norms
-inhibition of inappropriate speech or behavior
(AKA learning how to navigate life with language)
Deaf infants and the acquisition of language (hearing and deaf parents)
- deaf children with deaf+signing parents learn language at similar pace as hearing children with hearing parents
- deaf children with non-signing+hearing parents learn language at slower pace because parents are learning sign at the same time
Behaviorist perspective – positive reinforcement, punishment, prompting
- power of positive reinforcement, it’s good
- skill behavior, like prompting
- limitations of punishment, its bad