Exam 2 Flashcards
Act of stealing entrusted goods
Embezzlement
Act of stealing goods
Theft
What is the difference between embezzlement and theft?
embezzlement has to do with ENTRUSTED goods.
What do you need to commit a crime? (criminal intent)
Mens Rea
What is RICO?
Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
What does RICO address?
Organized Crime Organizations (mafia, mob)
What does RICO look for?
Predicate offenses
A series of crimes that set up/lead to a larger crime.
Predicate offenses
What are examples of predicate offenses?
bribery, fraud, theft, blackmail, extortion, money laundering, counterfeiting, illegal gambling
Do you always need a warrant?
Yes (with few exceptions)
What are the exceptions to getting a warrant?
Evidence in plain view or being actively destroyed
What to use in a trial when not read Miranda Rights?
Use evidence, not confession/testimony
Greatest reform of financial service law, cracks down on falsification of financial documents
Sarbanes Oxley (SOX)
Prevents funding of terrorist organizations
Patriot Act
Preventing law enforcement from collecting evidence or testimonies
Obstruction of Justice
What is the difference between TORTS and CRIMES?
Torts = private wrong
Crime = public wrong
Attorney/Client
Doctor/Patient
Leader of Church/Member of Church
Therapist/Patient
Members of Congress
Privileged Communication
Past districts negligently wrote positive letters of recommendation for a principal who had multiple sexual assault violations.
A student victim’s family sued previous districts for not warning about the Principal’s behavior
Randi W. vs Murdoc Joint Unified School District
Third-party knew of an existing contract between two parties, the third party interferes with the contract, original parties are injured by a breach of contract
Contractual Interference
5 elements of negligence
Duty
Breach of Duty
Cause in Fact
Proximate Cause
Damages
A woman waiting for a train gets blown up after two men running towards another train drop a package of fireworks that explode on the tracks.
Palsgraf vs Long Island Railroad
Party knows the risk and acts on it anyways
Assumption of Risk
Compares both parties in a negligence case to determine who is more negligent. Receive damages based on how negligent you are.
Comparative Negligence
If you are at all negligent for the incident then you do not receive any damages.
Contributory Negligence