EXAM 2 Flashcards
Tort
Civil wrong that interferes with one’s property or person
What court do Torts fall under
Civil Court
Tort v.s. Distinguished Crime
Torts violate private duty while distinguished crimes violate public duty
Can an act be both a crime and a tort?
yes
Intentional Torts
Wrongdoer meant to do it
Negligence
Failure to exercise due care
Strict Liability
Absolute liability due to the dangerous nature of the activity (does not need to be proven “guilty” or “innocent”)
Torts and Contracts fall under what type of law
common law
Assault
threatening a person with the intent of harm
Battery
harming a person
False Imprisonment
detaining a person without their consent
Shopkeeper’s Privilege
Store owners are allowed to detain a shoplifter for a reasonable amount of time
Intentional Infliction of Distress
outrageous conduct that leads to the mental anguish of an individual (mental cruelty)
Invasion of Privacy
public disclosure of private facts, affairs, or damaging one’s name/reputation
Defamation
a false statement made about another person
4 forms of defamation
- Libel: false statement written
- Slander: false statement spoken
- Online issue: false statement published online
- Defenses: skewed truth (not typically held to the same standard)
Product Disparagement
false statements made about a product or business
Wrongful Interference with Contracts
a third party interferes with other’s right to a contract
Trespass
unauthorized action with respect to land or property
4 Elements of Negligence
- Duty to Exercise reasonable care
- Breach of Duty
- Causation: duty and breach are connected to the plaintiff’s injuries
- Damages: actual losses that are sustained
Contributory Negligence
Plaintiff’s actions contributed to the “negligent” results, thus not getting the same compensation because they were a part of the situation
Comparative Negligence
Plaintiff and defendant’s contribution are compared, and compensation is determined by the degree of fault from each party
Express Assumption
a written acknowledgement that the plaintiff was aware of the risks
Implied Assumption
risks are inherently understood based on the activity the plaintiff is taking part in