Exam Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a Treaty?

A

Article 2(1)(a) defines a treaty as a written international agreement concluded between States that is governed by international law and can be embodied in a single instrument or in two or more, whatever their particular designation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

International Law

A

body of rules and principles that determine the rights and duties of States, primarily in respect of their dealings with other States and the citizens of other States, and that determine what is a State… and when and within what geographical territory they exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Codify

A

To formalise customary international law, practiced legal customs and general legal principles into written legal texts or instruments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the sources of international Law?

A

Treaties (conventions), international customs, and generalized principles of law recognized by civilized nations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What Article of the Statute of the International Court of Justice governs the sources of international law?

A

Article 38

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In addition to the original 3 sources of int. law, is there any more?

A

1 more in form of judicial decisions subject to the conditions laid out n article 59 of the statute of the ICJ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is customary international law?

A

A rule of practice that is used consistently internationally with a belief of legal obligation to it, aka opinio juris.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What international case outlines the concept of customary international law?

A

North Sea Continental Shelf Cases 1969 ICJ Reps 44

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in the North Sea Continental Shelf Cases?

A

The ICJ settled a dispute between Germany(G), Denmark(D) and the Netherlands(N) regarding delimiting continental shelf areas in the north sea.

D and N wanted to use the equidistance principle from the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelves and G disagreed.

The ICJ held that G was not obliged to agree to the aforementioned principle as there was not consistent and continuous practice of the principle. It was then held that the principle was not binding, for lack of state practice as well as the fact that Germany did not ratify to the Geneva Convention till much later.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What alternatives are their to treaties that are non binding and what are they?

A

‘Soft law’ which refers to non-binding rules, guidelines, principles, declarations or resolutions that influence international behaviour whilst lacking the formal legally binding status of hard law such as treaties and coventions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Benefits of Soft Law

A

Soft law is non binding, and more flexible whilst also maintaining the ability to influence international behaviour. That means that legally enforceable obligations can be avoided and states can implement principles of soft law in accordance with their own interests and beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Crystalising international law?

A

the establishment of originally non-binding principles, practices or norms such as ‘soft law’ as legally binding rules, often as part of customary international laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What purpose did the Vienna Treaty on the Law of Treaties 1969 have?

A

To codify existing law regarding treaties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did the VCLT 1969 codify international treaty law?

A

It consolidated existing customary law regarding treaties which in turn provided a standardised framework for treaty law. This made practices regarding treaties become universal across states which also implementing new legal concepts and clarifying the amiguous ones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What laws regarding treaties were ambiguous prior to the VCLT and why?

A

One example being that of reservations. Specifying when reservations were permissible as well as the impact they could have on treaty relations was relatively ambiguous prior to the VCLT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are some of the significant areas of treaty law consolidated in the VTLT 1969?

A

The definition of a treaty, conclusions of treaties, reservations, treaty interpretation, application of treaties, revision, validity/invalidity and finally suspension/termination.

17
Q

What is a treaty reservation?

A

a unilateral statement, however phrased or named, made by a State, when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, whereby it purports to exclude or to modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty in their application to that State.

18
Q

What are full powers?

A

Full powers is what is needed to consider a person authorised to make binding decisions and enter binding agreements on behalf of the state.

19
Q

What are the legal effects of a reservation to a treaty?

A

A reservation can modify a State’s legal obligations under the treaty.

20
Q

What provisions of the VCLT define the legal impacts of the vclt?

A

Articles 19-23.

21
Q

How does a state reply to a reservation?

A

By either acceptance or objection. The state may object to the reservation with the intention to maintain relations with the reserving state or they can object to the reservation with the intention to severe relations with the reserving state.

22
Q

What are the limitations to a reservation?

A

A state cannot make a reservation if the reservation is prohibited by the treaty or if it is incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.

23
Q

What resolutions was the conference on the law of treaties held pursuant to?

A

General Assembly Resolutions 2166 and 2287.v

24
Q

When was the VCLT adopted?

A

It was adopted on the 22nd of May 1969 and opened for signature by the UN Conference on the Law of Treaties on the 23rd of May 1969.

25
Q

When was the VCLT entered into force?

A

27th January 1980.

26
Q

What happened in the case of Prosecutor v Kallon and Kamara?

A

The judgment supported the theory that the only relevant requirement for an instrument to be defined as a treaty is that of being governed by international law.

27
Q

What happened in the case Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain case?

A

The case concluded that as soon as states meet and agree on certain commitments, the agreement in question becomes a treaty.

28
Q

What was the UK Rwanda Asylum Partnership?

A

a migration and economic development partnership with Rwanda introducing a scheme that would see many people with inadmissible asylum applications flown to Rwanda to have their applications processed there.

29
Q

What happened in the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Bay of Bengal?

A

Demonstrates the application of Article 7 of the VCLT in identifying where a representative of state did not have full powers when signing an instrument, making said instrument invalid.

30
Q

What is the general rule for treaty interpretation?

A

In article 31 of the VCLT the general rule for interpretation is that the interpretation must be fair, honest, and done in a way that reflects the intentions of the parties at the time of conclusion.

The treaty and its words must be interpreted in their ordinary meaning within the context of the situation and must be interpreted in light of the object and purpose of the treaty.

31
Q

What is the purpose of supplementary means of interpretation and what are they?

A

These can be used in the case that interpretation based on article 31 leaves the meaning ambiguous or obscure or leads to an unreasonable result.

Two examples include Preparatory Work and Circumstances of the Conclusion of the Treaty. Preparatory Work can help identify specific intentions of the parties.

32
Q

How are disputes in interpretation solved?

A

The ICJ often provides authoritative interpretations of treaties in cases brought before it. Other dispute settlement mechanisms can be called upon aswell.

33
Q

How does context impact treaty interpretation?

A

Context includes the text itself, preambles, annexes and any related documents. These all come together to support treaty interpretation.

34
Q

What is the VCLT?

A

international agreement that provides the rules and guidelines for the creation, interpretation, operation, and termination of treaties between states. It is known as the treaty on treaties.

35
Q

What is the conclusion of a treaty?

A

the result of bringing a treaty to an agreement or settlement.