Exam Flashcards
Directly stated
Explicit
Not directly stated
Implicit
The main argument of the author
Claim
What are the characteristics of a good claim
Debatable
Unique
Not neutral
Clear
Rational
What are the 3 types of claim
Fact, value, policy
Can be verified by true or false
C of fact
Statements that can be qualified
Claim of value
Asserts which conditions are better
Claim of value
Gives idea on what is good or bad
Claim of value
Based on philosophical, aesthetic beliefs and moral standpoints
Claim of value
Asserts implementation of a certain policy
Claim of policy
Errors in reasoning that invalidate an argument
Logical fallacies
What are the equivalent terms of the ff:
Reasoning
Evidence
Claim
Statement
Argument
Premises
Conclusion
Proposition
What are the 2 general types of reasoning
Deductive and inductive reasoning
Truth of conclusion is certain
Deductive reasoning
Truth of conclusion is probable
Inductive reasoning
Consists of statements beginning with premises and ends with conclusion.
Logical arguments
Give the 22 common logical fallacies
False dilemma/ dichotomy
Appeal to ignorance
Slippery slope
Complex question
Appeal to force
Appeal to pity
Appeal to consequences
Bandwagon
Appeal to the person
Appeal to authority
Anonymous authority
Hasty generalization
False/ weak analogy
Accident
Post hoc
Wrong direction
Complex cause
Irrelevant conclusion
Strawman
Affirming the consequent
Denying the antecedent
Inconsistency
Presents arguments as 1 of only 2 options
False dilemma
Just because something is not proven to be false, does not mean it is true
Appeal to ignorance
Superficial and unacceptable consequences are drawn
Slippery slope
Expected to accept or reject points; 2 or more points are rolled into 1
Complex question
Using threats
Appeal to force
Using pity
Appeal to pity
Denying the conclusion with fear of unpleasant consequences
Appeal to consequences
Validity is based on the majority
Bandwagon
Attacking the person instead of idea
Appeal to the person
Asserts own expertise
Appeal to authority
Author is not stated/ mentioned
Anonymous authority
Not significant enough to support a generalization about a population
Hasty generalization
Assuming 2 concepts are similar in some ways and in other ways
False/ weak analogy
Applying a rule where there should be an exception
Accident
Event A is the cause of B, because A happened before B
Post hoc
Reverse in the direction between cause and effect
Wrong direction
Explanation is reduced to one thing; there are other factors which contributed to the event.
Complex cause
Supposed to prove something, but concludes something else instead
Irrelevant conclusion
Position of the opposition is twisted so that it is easier to refute
Strawman
If Statement A is true then B is true
Affirming the consequent
If Statement A is not true then B is not true
Denying the antecedent
Arguments contradict one another
Inconsistency
Presents newspapers opinion on an issue
Editorial
Reflects the majority of the editorial board
Editorial
Tries to persuade readers to think the same
Editorial