Exam Flashcards
Explain Lukes’ first and second dimensions of power.
The first dimension of power is about direct control and influence over others behaviour, such as the government’s power to create law, whereas the second dimension of is about shaping the broader agenda, influencing public opinion and controlling what issues are discussed or ignored. Heywood comments the first as conscious action whereas VK adds that the power of non-decision making is just as important as decision making.
Why would the difference between power as a capacity and power as something a person or group exercise be important to Stephen Lukes.
This would be important to Lukes as the capacity to exercise power is arguably as significant as actually exercising said power.
Name at least one criticism of Lukes’ view of power.
Lukes only speaks of power as an issue and only analyses the negative use of power, disregarding it as a positive force. He also largely focuses on power as formal and tangible, whether it’s used or not, but doesn’t focus on less centralised forms such as collective power of people.
What are the FOUR weaknesses of contemporary representative democracy.
- The populus rarely gets direct participation.
- The public don’t exercise power themselves.
- It is susceptible to industrial influence
- Legitimacy comes under question as politicians make and achieve short term goals to be elected.
What are the disadvantages of a written constitution?
- A constitution is rigid and thereby incredibly difficult to change. The Aus Constitution required a referendum to pass, meaning elected representatives become redundant (Voice Vote)
- Ambiguous language can lead to misinterpretation. (2nd Amm. right to bear arms)
What is Mounk’s theory of liberalism and democracy?
Mounk simply comments that the idea of democracy and liberalism is up to interpretation and the unwillingness to consider political evolution is ignorant but non inexcusable.
What does Mounk define as democracy, liberal institutions and liberal democracies?
- Democracy: a set of binding electoral institutions that effectively translate popular views into policy.
- Liberal institutions effectively protect the rule of law and guarantee rights.
- A liberal democracy is a political system that protects individual rights AND translates popular views into policy.
What ideas might Lukes have found useful in Gramsci’s account of hegemony?
Gramsci’s account of hegemony revolves around the idea that power in society isn’t solely maintained through coercion of force but also through the consent and active participation of the ruled.
Lukes would have valued the account of consent in maintaining and contesting social and political power and appreciate the deeper understanding on power operating beyond coercion.
According to the economist, Marx was wrong about history but may have been right about capitalism. Do you agree?
To a degree, though I do believe that Marx’s theories on class struggle has reverberated throughout time, notable in the French and Russian Revolutions.
I also believe that his theories about capitalism hold merit, but also detail a miserable working class whereas I don’t believe this to be entirely true, or it at least hasn’t materialised yet.
According to Marx, what is the relationship between the dominant political ideological ideas in a capitalist society and its economic organisation.
According to Marx, dominant political and ideological ideas in a capitalist society are determined by the ruling class, which controls the means of production and holds economic power. These ideas are perpetuated in the current economic order. These ideas dictate how production is finances, who owns these economic resources and how goods are distributed.
What is Antonio Gramsci’s account of hegemony?
Gramsci finds difference between Hegemonic influence and domination.
Jessop observed that for Gramsci, ‘the capitalist state should not be seen as a basically coercive apparatus but as an institutional ensemble based on a variable mix of coercion, consent, fraud and corruption’.
Gramsci argued that power could generally be exercised only through compromises and strategic concessions among different social groups.
What is elite theory?
The elite theory is a perspective in political sciences that suggests power and influence in societies are concentrated in the hands of a small, privileged, and wealthy elite. According to this theory, societies are not governed by the will of the majority or through democratic processes, but rather by a select group of individuals who possess significant resources such as wealth, social status, or political connections.
To what extent does elite theory reflect the distribution of power in contemporary Australia?
Elite theory does have presence within Australian power as the political elites have a very large say in legislative processing. For example, the two main political parties hold huge influence with the Australian political sphere. As well as this, big businesses are able to contribute large amount of money to political parties in exchange for legislative favour.
Compare pluralist and neo-pluralist theories of the state.
The pluralist theory of the state poses that power in a democratic society is dispersed among multiple interest groups, with no single dominating completely. Decision making occurs through a competitive process of bargaining and compromise, resulting in policies that reflect a balancing of diverse interests.
The neo pluralist theory outlines a more realistic approach in which elites rule each interest group. It highlights the need for representatives of each group collaborate to shape policy outcomes. It acknowledges the complexity of policy creation and emphasises the importance of administrative agencies.
Do Marxist approaches to the state have anything to offer in the 21st century.
Sure. Marxist approaches to the unfolding of capitalist ideologies are somewhat able to be replicated within 21st century Australia, but perhaps are too extreme. His ideas on capitalism illustrate an extremely repressed society which at least is not apparent as of yet.
What were the key features of post WWII welfare states?
Social welfare programs such as universal healthcare, unemployment benefits and public pensions – these provided a safety net for citizens. As well as this, the government held a more proactive role within the economy, providing economic assistance with taxation and wealth distribution policy. They also prioritised social rights, including education and housing.
From the 1980’s the role of the state in Australia, NZ, the UK and to some extent the US underwent significant change. What were the drivers for change and what was the nature of the change.
The drivers for change included aspects of globalisation and neoliberalism, and perhaps a more ideological shift towards market-oriented policy. The nature of the change involved the privatisation of state-owned enterprise, deregulation to promote market efficiency and the liberalisation of trade barriers to allow for globalisation. These aimed to stimulate economic competition and decrease government intervention in the economy.