Exam Flashcards

1
Q

systematic reviews

A
  • Form of filtered evidence (reviews previous studies)
  • Integrates research evidence/findings (i.e., primary research)
  • Answers a specific (research or clinical) question
  • Follows explicit procedures (i.e., has a set of methods) → someone could follow their procedures and methods to reproduce the study
  • Determined in advance
  • Reproducible
  • Verifiable/Transparent
  • Offers recommendations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

scoping review

A
  • Research question is very broad/general
  • Can include quantitative and qualitative literature
  • Follow a specific process, that is transparent and reproducible
  • Shallow - skim the literature (not deep)
  • Authors don’t critically appraise the literature (don’t determine how strong the research is) (sample size, interventions, randomization, validity, etc.)
  • Don’t necessarily make recommendations for clinical practice (because they are not appraising the literature)
  • “How is complexity theory being used in health research?” –> So many answers to this question
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

literature review/narrative review/integrative review

A
  • Not reproducible (don’t follow agreed upon methods), methods are not explicit
  • Used to make an argument for why a study should be conducted
  • Not really to answer a research question
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

meta analysis

A
  • Form a systematic review (specific form)
  • Systematic review that statistically combines the results of multiple studies together
  • Very specific question
  • All the studies included have to have answer the question in the same way (same methods)
  • “Is ___ medication better than ___ medication for ___ disease”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why use systematic reviews

A
  • Born from EBP - make healthcare more effective
  • Patients aren’t receiving 100% (not enough) of expected/good care
  • Patients may get care that is not needed or care that could be potentially harmful
  • Systematic review - methodological approach (ie. way) of finding, critiquing, and synthesizing research that exists on a topic to answer a specific question
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

systematic reviews

A
  • use rigorous methods to identify, appraise, and synthesize primary studies
  • provide best available objective evidence on a topic
  • filter evidence through own evidence informed practice lens
  • NOT scoping reviews
  • purpose is to:
    address a specific research question
    obtain evidence to inform clinical decisions/practice
    synthesize findings of a number of individual studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

systematic reviews: how it works

A
  • Research question is clearly stated (PICO)
  • Search strategy is clearly stated (terms, strategy)
  • Eligibility criteria (fit with PICO)
  • Inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Methodology (to reduce bias) (Tools, instruments used, randomization, reliability (size, effect))
  • Studies critically appraised
  • Tables
  • Analysis
  • Recommendations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why is it important to critically appraise the articles in a systematic review?

A

If you are gonna offer recommendations for clinical practice or future research you must be sure the research is strong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

systematic reviews: summary

A
  • Rigorous analysis of a number of studies answering a clinical research question (evidence)
  • Appraisal of studies
  • Conclusion - recommendations based on strength, quality, and consistency of data in primary studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics of Qualitative Research Design

A
  • Consistent with a constructivist or critical paradigm
    • Everyone creates their own reality (based on experiences, etc.)
    • There is no absolute truth to be measured
  • Flexible, elastic, emergent
  • Intense researcher involvement
  • Subjective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is qualitative research?

A
  • Inquiry to explain and understand human experiences
  • Data: words or textual form
  • Conducted in natural settings that people live in every day
  • Study human experience (of health)
  • Focused on meaning
  • Explanatory, descriptive
  • Provides context
  • Answer questions, how? Or why? (not effect or associated)
  • Goal is to enhance understanding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

steps in qualitative research

A
  • Review of the literature
    Use literature to justify question (why does it matter?)
    Asses gaps in the literature
    determine/describe phenomenon of interest
    Effects study design (data collection, analysis, etc.)
  • Study design
    Lays out the methods used to conduct the study
  • Sample
  • Setting: recruitment and data collection
  • Data collection (Interviews)
  • Data analysis
  • Findings
  • Conclusions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Qualitative sampling

A
  • Purposive sampling - Purposefully sample people who have experienced the phenomenon of interest
  • Snowball/network sampling
  • Maximum variation - sample people with lots of experience in health care system, and little amount of experience in health care system (get a variety of responses)
  • Inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • Description of how participants were recruited
  • Sample size
    Small sample size (could be 5-10 people)
    Text data cannot be synthesized by a computer, it all has to be synthesized by the researcher, so a few people results in a lot of data
    There is no sample size calculation (minimum sample size)
    Sample size is estimated based on convention
  • Data saturation - when your collecting qualitative data you start to hear the same things over and over again → so you don’t need to sample more people if everyone is saying the same thing
  • Description of sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

qualitative data collection

A
  • Naturalistic setting - where people experience the phenomenon
  • Open-ended questions to elicit narratives
  • Interviews recorded and transcribed
  • Individual or focus group interviews
  • gatekeepers
  • field notes
  • ethics and consent addressed
  • data collection and analysis are concurrent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

pros and cons of focus groups

A

Pros - group conversation, helps to get people talking
Cons - some people can take over the conversation, not so good for difficult topics (people aren’t open to talking about touchy stuff in a group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

gatekeepers

A

People who inadvertently keep certain participants from joining a study
Ex: you are selecting nurses to talk about working conditions in the emergency department, manager will pick the most positive nurses to do the study (keep the negative ones out)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

qualitative data analysis

A
  • immersion - Researcher must immerse themselves in the data (get to know the data) (read the data multiple times)
  • constant comparison - As the researcher comes up with new findings, constantly compare to the old findings
  • bracketing - Researcher trying to become aware of their assumptions, thoughts, beliefs, biases, experiences related to research. Become conscious of how those things affect the research
  • Interpretation of meaning; description of process; description of experience
  • Codes, categories, themes - Coming up with different codes for data, categorizing data, look for patterns in the data (themes)
  • Researcher interprets meanings - Subjective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

qualitative findings

A

​​Use participants’ own words (direct quotations) to support themes
Describe phenomenon, process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

qualitative discussion

A

Compare findings with literature
Suggest implications for practice, education, research, policy
Limitations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

reflexivity

A
  • process for understanding how a researchers perspective can influence the research
  • Acknowledge biases (bracketing)
  • Journal
  • Researcher affects interviews; interviews affect researcher (going native - how the researcher can become like the participants)
  • Be open to findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

rigor in qualitative research

A
  • Researcher–participant interaction (reflexivity)
  • Researcher as instrument
  • Trustworthiness (e.g., credibility, auditability, fittingness)
  • Triangulation - looking at a phenomenon from 3 different ways
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

credibility

A

degree of truth in the findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Auditability

A

being very clear in how the research was conducted/data was collected (clear in how you arrived at your findings)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

fittingness

A

how meaningful the findings seem to everyday practice

25
Q

triangulation

A
  • looking at a phenomenon from 3 different ways
  • Data, investigator, methodological
  • Data - collecting data at different times, places, __
  • Investigator - get 3 different people to collect data
  • Methodological - use 3 different methods to conduct research
26
Q

meta synthesis

A

Systematic review of qualitative research
Synthesis of findings
Integrates findings and summarizes evidence that is relevant to practice

27
Q

qualitative research designs

A
Grounded theory
Case studies 
Historical
Ethnography
Phenomenology
Participatory action
28
Q

qualitative research: importance to nursing

A
  • Use findings to improve patient care
  • Provides new perspectives
  • Provides insight to patient experiences
  • Expands understanding
  • Gives voice to those unheard
  • Contributes to instrument development
  • helps to develop theory
29
Q

phenomenology

A
  • Purpose: to understand lived experience
  • Moving away from post-positivism
  • Based on constructivism
  • To describe a phenomenon
  • For topics that have not been studied or need a new perspective
  • Making sense of experience: How people perceive it, describe it, feel about it
    To establish context and meaning
  • Intersubjectivity - people share a common world (body and space in time)
30
Q

descriptive (husserl)

A
  • Description of the lived world
  • Essence
  • Describe as how people see it/how people perceive things
31
Q

interpretive/hermeneutic

A
  • Meanings, relationships (between phenomenon/experiences)

- Viewed through a historical/cultural context (lens)

32
Q

phenomenology sampling

A
  • Purposive sampling - select participants who are living or have lived the phenomenon of interest
  • Sample size
    For depth of understanding rather than breadth
    About 6-10 participants
  • Sample recruitment should continue until data saturation (no new themes or themes are fully developed)
33
Q

phenomenology data collection

A
  • Interpretation from text or the written word (eg. charting notes, emails, etc)
  • Interview
  • Open ended questions
  • Bracketing or reflection to check biases/assumptions
34
Q

phenomenology data analysis

A
  • Begins with data collection (can happen simultaneously with data collection during phenomenology)
  • Moving from participants descriptions to researchers synthesis (put everything together) (researcher interprets)
  • According to philosophy
  • Results in a description of participants lived experience of the phenomenon under stud
35
Q

phenomenology findings

A
  • Researcher interprets
  • Present findings as themes
  • Use of direct quotations to illustrate
36
Q

phenomenology summary

A
  • Provides understanding of context and meaning of experiences
  • Depth rather than breadth (small sample size allows you to go deep)
  • Based on philosophy
  • Descriptive, interpretive, hermeneutic
  • Researcher/participant relationship
  • Bracketing or reflexivity
  • Results in descriptions of participants lived experiences of a phenomenon
  • Supported by direct quotes from interviews
37
Q

ethnography

A
  • Based on constructivist paradigm
  • Study of cognitive models or patterns of behavior of people within a culture
  • Seek to understand another way of life from the perspective of people experiencing it
  • Focuses on patterns of behaviors within a culture (attitudes, beliefs, and practices of the group)
  • Culture is dynamic (changes)
  • Unstated rules
  • Can be broad or very specific
  • Example: Culture of neonatal unit
38
Q

ethnography: roots

A
  • Anthropology, sociology
  • Study of culture (attitudes, practices, beliefs of a group)
  • Understand way of life from perspective of people experiencing it
  • Understanding context in natural setting
  • Detailed description of everyday life: “make the familiar strange”
39
Q

emic perspective

A

Insider view of the culture (within)

40
Q

etic perspective

A

Outside perspective (researcher)

41
Q

ethnographic methods

A
  • participant observation
  • interview (in depth) (individual or focus group)
  • artifacts/document review
42
Q

ethnography: interview

A
  • In-depth
  • Individual or focus group (elicit a collective view)
  • Members of cultural group experiencing phenomenon
  • Called informants (people who inform us about the culture - interviewees) and gatekeepers (people who let us into the culture)
43
Q

ethnography: observation

A
  • In the field
  • Document field notes (structured or unstructured)
  • Participant observer
    • Complete
    • Observer as a participant
    • Participant as observer
  • Attentive to how researcher affects behaviors
    • Prolonged engagement mitigates researcher effect (get used to the researcher and kind of forget about them being there)
  • Ethics: do not include people who do not give consent
44
Q

artifacts/document review

A

Tools (assessment tools)
Policy documents
Organizational policies, visions, value statements

45
Q

ethnography analysis

A

Data collected and analyzed concurrently
Synthesized by the researcher
Codes, categories, themes
Added framework or critique used to guide analysis

46
Q

ethnography findings

A
  • Rich description
  • Participant quotations
  • Focus on all three sources of data (not just interviews) (observation, document review, interviews)
  • Pictures of artifacts
47
Q

purpose of grounded theory

A
  • Systematic method consisting of several flexible strategies for constructing theory through analyzing qualitative data
  • Systematic set of procedures used to explore the social processes that guide human interactions and to inductively develop a theory on the basis of these observations
  • Utilize and inductive process to generate substantive theory about a social phenomenon
  • Create and in depth and context based knowledge base from the participants unique experiences
  • Generate theory about dominant social processes
  • Theory that emerges is grounded in the data
48
Q

why use grounded theory

A
  • When a theory is not available to explain or understand a process
  • Theories may be available but they are developed and tested on a different sample or populations of the researcher’s interest
  • The power of grounded theory studies relies on its tools to understand empirical world and construct a theory to explain phenomena of interest
  • Theory is constructed and derived from data collected during the research process and not chosen prior to the beginning of research
    ANALYZES PROCESSES
49
Q

philosophical foundations of grounded theory

A
  • Sociology
  • Symbolic Interactionism
  • Human beings behave and act based on the meaning it has for them
  • Meaning is interpreted and derived through social interaction
  • GT about meanings, processes, agency action in social contexts
  • Reveals processes
50
Q

traditional grounded theory

A
  • Glaser
  • positivist
  • reality to be determined
  • categories emerge from data
  • researcher not involved
  • little influence from literature
  • rigorous, prescriptive, theoretical coding
51
Q

reformulated grounded theory

A
  • Strauss & Corbin
  • post positivist to constructivist
  • reality to be interpreted
  • categories identified, applied, and tested
  • researcher interprets data
  • axial coding - to explain properties and relationships around concepts
52
Q

constructivist grounded theory

A
  • Charmaz
  • constructivist to post modern
  • data co-constructed
  • truth is local/multiple
  • researchers interpretive understanding rather than explanation
  • researcher actively involved
  • learn from participants, multiple interviews
  • represent as narrative or story
  • matrix - micro/macro conditions influencing interactions
53
Q

features of grounded theory

A
  • Study of processes, interactions, behaviors, experiences
  • Eg. through illness, a care delivery system, or organizational pathway
  • Generates or adds to theory
  • Seeks explanation rather than description
54
Q

Grounded Theory: Data Collection

A
  • Mainly in-depth interviews
  • Open ended questions
  • Observation
  • Documentation
55
Q

grounded theory sample

A
  • Purposive
  • Theoretical - Sampling method used to select experiences that help the researchers test ideas and gather complete information about developing concepts. Researchers seek participants who can further clarify the emerging concepts. A way of collecting data, and deciding what data to collect based on the theory and categories that emerge from your data.
  • Snowball
  • Saturation
56
Q

grounded theory: data analysis

A
  • Concurrent with data collection
  • Iterative
  • Open coding
  • Line by line
  • Categories expanded, developed, or collapsed
  • Constant comparison method
  • Continuously comparing new categories with data
  • Theoretical memos
  • Axial coding
  • Define relationships among themes
57
Q

grounded theory findings

A
  • Often a visual presentation, narrative, theoretical propositions, model
  • Detailed description of the theory
  • Explains, interprets, or predicts the process involved
  • Defines relationships between concepts
58
Q

strengths of grounded theory

A

Most prescriptive in describing methods

Focus on processes

59
Q

limitations of grounded theory

A

Can get complicated