exam 1 Flashcards
(94 cards)
Strategy as THEORY
EXPLANATION: Explaining how to achieve high levels of performance in the markets and industries within which the company is operating
Strategy as a POSITION
LOCATION: creating a “niche” position that generates above average returns (rents)
Strategy as a CHOICE
PATTERN: making choices about where and how you will compete
competitive strategy
single market
business units
competitive advantage
corporate strategy
multi-market
corporation as a whole
corporate advantage
strategy is about what the financial targets and budgets should be, what market share the firm will generate, how much revenue the firm should achieve etc
FALSE
strategy is NOT about the what the financial targets and budgets should be, what the market share the firm should have next year, what earnings the firm will generate
TRUE
strategy is about performing activities that are different from rivals, making trade-offs, and creating fit among a company’s activities
porter 1996
TRUE
why do some firms perform better than others?
- Industry Structure/Attractiveness: some industries are more profitable than others.
- competitive Advantage: some firms are more profitable than others in the same industry
do industries vary widely in profitability?
yes
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE:
there are forces that are beyond your control
example:
newspapers
internet
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE:
tend to be stable
high profit industries tend to remain high profit, low profit industries tend to remain low profit
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE:
varies widely around the world
ex: Uber in Japan
was not successful but successful here in the U.S.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE:
shall we exit the low profitability industries?
no
many supermarket businesses have single digit ROAs.
ex:
whole fooods
kroger
suprerValu
whole foods has found a way to build a strong competitive advantage in a structurally unattractive business
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE:
can you conclude that Pfizer is a better managed company than alaska airlines?
no
p is in a high profit industry, A Air is in a low profit industry
A Air is doing better b/c it is better than its competitors
porters 5 forces
new entrants ; threat of new entrants
suppliers ; bargaining power of suppliers
buyers ; bargaining power of buyers
substitutes ; threat of substitutes
Rivalry current market
threat of industry or rivalry:
perfect competition
large # of competing firms homogenous products
low-cost entry/exit
ex: crude oil
firm conduct: price taking
expected firm performance: normal
social welfare implications: maximized
threat of industry or rivalry:
monopolistic competition
large # of competing firms heterogenous products
low-cost entry/exit
ex: tooth paste, shampoo, cars
firm conduct: product differentiation (make it different than the rest!)
expected firm performance: above normal
social welfare implications: less than perfect competition
type of industry or rivalry:
oligopoly
small # of competing firms homogenous/heterogenous products
costly entry/exit
ex: U.S breakfast cereal
firm conduct: collusion
expected firm performance: above normal
social welfare implications: less than monopolistic competition
type of industry or rivalry:
monopoly
one firm,
costly entry
ex: microsoft operating system
firm conduct: use market power to set prices
expected firm performance: above normal
social welfare implications: less than oligopoly
threat of rivalry analysis
large # of competing firms
competing firms that are the same size and have the same influence
slow industry growth
lack of product differentiation
productive capacity added in large increments
high exit barriers
some indicators of intense rivalry:
price cutting, frequent intro of new products, intense ad campaigns.
rapid competitive actions and reactions.
threat of new entry analysis
economic scale
product differentiation
ex: strong brand identity, customer switching costs
cost advantages independent of scale ex: proprietary technology, know-how, favorable geographic locations, learning curve
contrived deterrence
ex: retaliatory actions, price cuts, investing in excess capacity
govt policy
threat of substitutes analysis
substitutes meet approx. the same customers needs in different ways.
ex:
amazon and barnes & noble
coke and water
crude oil and solar energy
crude oil and conservation
cnn/fox news and time/ newsweek
cable tv and broadcast television
threat of suppliers analysis
the suppliers industry is dominated by a small number of firms
suppliers sell unique or highly differentiated products
suppliers not threatened by substitutes
suppliers threatened forward integration
firms are not important customers for suppliers
switching costs of suppliers are low
(that is, it is easy for suppliers to stop supplying materials to a firm, and start supplying another)