Exam 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What is argumentation

A

A form of instrumental communication relying on reasoning and prove to influence believe or behavior through with the use of spoken or written messages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are Wenzel’s perspectives?

A

Rhetorical’s perspective, dialectic perspective, logical perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is rhetorical perspective

A

Focuses on the arguers strategies for creating arguments and adapting them to the audience by relating context and content; Produces the uninterrupted exposition of a speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is dialectic perspective

A

Focuses on principles and procedures that encourage the give and take necessary for the critical study of a topic; produces a dialogue, a conversation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is logical perspective

A

Offers a series of formal rules for distinguishing sound arguments from unsound ones; Emphasizes accuracy in both proof and reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is informal logic

A

Argumentation is described as this because it does not lead to absolute conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three artistic proofs

A

Ethos, logos, pathos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is ethos

A

Credibility of the rhetor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is pathos

A

Emotions or passions of the audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is logos

A

Logical appeals to rationality or intellect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the ELM theory

A

A theory about how audiences respond to messages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Central route

A

You are involved to a high extent; the quality of arguments, reasoning, and evidence matters most

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Peripheral route

A

The message has relevance to you and serves as your reason for involvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are ethics

A

Indicates the moral choices a person makes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are teological ethics

A

Based on the outcomes or ends of communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are deontological ethics

A

Based on a set of absolutes that differentiate between right and wrong ( basically a code of ethics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is a field of argumentation

A

A social or professional context in which people argue to make decisions or build a body of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is a field dependent

A

Specific to that particular field alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a field invariant

A

Things that do not change as you move from field to field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is presumption

A

Specifies who occupies the ground at the beginning of the controversy; the opponent initially occupies the figurative ground; it only describes, does not judge the value or lack of value of the existing believes, institutions, laws, ideas, or policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is natural presumption

A

Derives from the observation of the natural order of whatever field we find ourselves in at a given time

22
Q

What is artificial presumption

A

In the legal system, it demonstrates how presumption is influenced by a field

23
Q

What is burden of proof

A

The application of the advocate to contest the ground by offering arguments that are logically sufficient to challenge presumption

24
Q

Who takes the burden of proof

A

The advocate; present beliefs and behaviors described by presumption are judged and evaluated on the basis of available evidence and an alternative as proposed

25
What is prima facie
Causes us to suspend our reliance on presumption as a guide for belief or behavior unless it is successfully changed; justifies a change in believe or behavior
26
Who presents prima Facie
The advocate; the form and content of the arguments offered determine the face value of the advocates case
27
What is locus of disagreement
The point at which your position diverges with someone else’s position; in the proposition, the locus is where we start a debate
28
What is inherency
The problem cannot be removed or separated from and is inevitable and a vital to the question within the proposition
29
Attitudinal inherency
The cause is found in the beliefs of a field
30
Structural inherency
The cause is found in behaviors that operationalize said believes
31
What are propositions
A statement that identifies the argumentative grounds and points to the change in belief or behavior sought by the advocate
32
Factual proposition
Either it is true or it is false, no in between
33
Singular value proposition
There is one single choice and that is the only option
34
Comparative value proposition
There are two choices, compare them and choose one
35
Policy proposition
A fact or value, and how to solve it
36
Definitional proposition
Opponents as well as the judges of the argument must understand the terms and agree on their definition
37
Types of definitions
Equivocal, vague, technical, new, coined
38
What is the Toulmin’s model and what is the object of it
Breaks down an argument into six parts; the object is to weigh and support points Both for and against the topic
39
What are the components of the primary triad
Claim, what you hope to prove; evidence, support and rationalization for the claim; warrant, helps draw connection between claim and evidence (often unspoken)
40
What are the components of the secondary triad
Backing, provides support for the warrant; rebuttal, potential objection to the claim; qualifiers, allows you to adjust and add specifiers to your claim making it a stronger argument, claim cannot be probable
41
What does the Toulmin’s model do for us
Forces you to think beyond your claim to want it stands upon, requires that you anticipate and consider possible rebottles to your claim, uses logical structure
42
What is evidence
Information taken from material of fact or opinion, used to establish the probable truth of a claim
43
Fact evidence
Can be verified as true or false; reports what is observed
44
Opinion evidence
The interpretation or evaluation statement of an expert in a field of regarding facts that are pertinent to that field
45
Statistic evidence
Present descriptive and inferential information about people, events or phenomena in a numeric format
46
Premises evidence
Factual evidence that is excepted because it reflects human belief or experience
47
Artifact evidence
Actual exhibits of objects, audio tapes or video tapes, or photographs presented for verification by the audience
48
Scientific evidence
The results of controlled experiments on the inferred effect of one variable on another
49
Primary evidence
Evidence from the person who did the research or observed the event first hand
50
Secondary evidence
Evidence discovered once removed from the event