Exam #1 Flashcards
Why are theories important? (3)
- Organize what we know into coherent set of principles
- Form testable hypotheses about children’s behavior
- Interpret findings
Continuous development
Change is gradual and smooth, each experience builds on earlier experiences
Discontinuous development
Change occurs in discrete steps with qualitative differences at each step
Overlapping waves for development
Variability in social behavior at a given point in time, change happens as children adopt new strategies
Current view of development (continuous or discontinuous)
Continuous but interspersed with transitional periods
Case study: Genie
Nature vs nurture, locked in basement, after certain amount of years passed she couldn’t learn how to talk
Current view of nature vs nuture
Both are important and interact, expression of biological characteristics is shaped by environmental circumstances
Current view of whether social development is universal across cultures
Some universal aspects but need to understand cultural variation
Rogoff’s research
Culture, Mayan vs US children, Mayan children better at attention and learning
Equifinality
Pathway, convergence, two children follow different paths to reach same outcome
Multifinality
Pathway, divergence, two children start out similarly but end up at different points
Early view on what role children play in their own development
Passive role, children shaped by external forces
Current view on what role children play in their own development
Active role, children explore and seek out info about world, participate in exchanges with others, shape own development
What makes for a “good” theory? (3)
- Parsimonious- simple
- Falsifiable- testable
- Applicable-practical relevance
Psychodynamic Perspectives: Freud
Development driven by unconscious instincts: sex, aggression, hunger
Shaped by relationships with others (mostly parents)
Freud’s psychosexual stages of development
Oral —> anal —> phallic (learns differences between males and females) —> latency (little or no sexual motivation) —> genital
Erikson’s psychosocial theory
Extended stages through adulthood, emphasized social environment over biology, specified tasks that must be accomplished at each stage, risks of failing to accomplish
Erikson’s stages
- Trust vs mistrust (0-1 years)
- Autonomy vs shame and doubt (1-3 years)- assert independence
- Initiative vs guilt (3-6 years)-responsibility and ambition
- Industry vs inferiority (6-12 years)-master tasks
- Identity vs confusion (12-20 years)
- Intimacy vs isolation (20-30 years)
- Generatively vs stagnation (30-65 years)-raise children, generative career, give back to community
- Integrity vs Despair (65+ years)
Strengths of Freud and Erikson
Emphasis on effects of early experience and social interactions on development, introduced concepts (attachment, gender roles, morality, identity)
Weaknesses of Freud and Erikson
Difficult to test empirically
Just Freud: not based directly on work with children
Just Erikson: mechanisms for transitioning across stages not identified
Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory
Transactional focus: children as agents in exploring and making sense of their environment
2 important processes for Piaget’s theory
- Assimilation- fit new info into existing schema
2. Accommodation- modify existing schema in response to new info
Piaget’s theory stages (4)
- Sensorimotor
- Preoperational
- Concrete operational
- Formal operational
Piaget’s sensorimotor period
0-2 years, differentiates self from objects and other people, imitate and engage in imaginative play, basic understanding of causality, develops object permanence
Piaget’s preoperational period
2-7 years, begins to use language and symbols, perspective is egocentric (can’t see perspective of others), irreversible, centered
Piaget’s concrete operations period
7-12 years, reasons logically about present objects, organizes objects into classes and series, grasps concept of conservation (ex: liquid in glass), can take another’s perspective
Piaget’s formal operations period
12+ years, thinking is flexible and complex, can consider abstract ideas and hypotheses
Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory
Development is best understood as a product of social interactions, especially with more skilled people
Zone of proximal development
Things the learner can do with help
Strengths of Piaget and Vygotsky
Based on direct work with children, links between cognition and social relations
Weaknesses of Piaget and Vygotsky
Piaget: series of universal, invariant, stages is contextually and culturally limited
Vygotsky: measurement of ZPD is difficult
Classical conditioning
Pavlov and Watson, new stimulus is paired with familiar stimulus until individual responds to new in the same way as familiar
Operant conditioning
Skinner, reinforcement learning: rewards increase the likelihood that behavior will recur, punishment decreases likelihood
Strengths/weaknesses of traditional learning theories (conditioning)
Strength: useful for explaining certain aspects of development
Weaknesses: overemphasis on behavior with neglect of individual differences
Bandura’s cognitive social learning theory
Importance of observational learning, demonstrated that children who watched another person behaving aggressively were likely to imitate that person
Bandura’s observations
Children do not imitate automatically, cognition is part of process, children must pay attention and be able to remember and reproduce it
Reciprocal determinism
Bandura, children reciprocally influence the model
Bandura’s strengths
Considerable empirical evidence, many practical applications
Bandura’s weaknesses
Not very developmental in scope, minimal attention to individual differences
Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory
Child’s world is organized as a set of nested systems or contexts, development is affected by interactions between and within systems, processes are culture-specific
Bronfenbrenner’s Systems
Microsystem —> mesosystem —> exosystem—> macrosystem
Microsystem
Context in which children live and interact with the people and institutions closest to them
Mesosystem
Interrelations among components of microsystem
Exosystem
Settings that influence development but in which the child does not play a direct role
Macrosystem
Values, ideologies, and laws of society and culture
Chronosystem
Overarching changes within the child or in one of the systems