Exam#1 Flashcards

1
Q

What is Narrative?

A

Something that we all engage in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Genre

A
  1. Kind; sort; style.
  2. A particular style or category of works of art; esp. a type of
    literary work characterized by a particular form, style, or
    purpose.
    Genres are formed by conventions that change over time as
    new genres are invented and the use of old ones is
    discontinued.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Examples of genre

A

Castaway Narrative
Science Fiction
Buddy Film

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Abstract Time

A

Provide a grid of regular intervals with
which we can locate events. (e.g., second, century,
microwave frequency oscillations, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Narrative Time

A

Allows events to create the order of
time. Not necessarily any length at all. [Paul Ricoeur
calls this “human time”]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nonfictional/Factual Narrative

A

: Details of the narrative can
be verified outside of the narrative. These narratives are
referential or advance claims of referential truthfulness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fictional Narrative:

A

Details of the narrative cannot be verified
outside of the narrative. These narratives do not advance
claims of referential truthfulness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Are the boundaries between fiction and nonfiction rigid?

A

No.fictional

narratives often rely on nonfictional details in their narration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mimetic

A

An emphasis on the components that work
together to create the illusion of a plausible world
inhabited by plausible characters. Foregrounds the
relationship between the reader and the text. Here, we
attend to the content of the text.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Synthetic

A

An emphasis on those artificial components
that work together to create the text. Foregrounds a
text’s artificiality and its status as constructed object.
Here, we attend to the form of the text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Thematic

A

An emphasis on those components that

raise or refer to larger, abstract concepts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Narrativity

A

“The set of properties characterizing
narrative and distinguishing it from
nonnarrative; the formal and contextual
features making a (narrative) text more or
less narrative, as it were” (Prince 65).
“Narrativity is a matter of degree that does
not correlate to the number of devices,
qualities or, for that matter, words that are
employed in the narrative” (Abbott 25).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Prose Narrative Fiction

A

The representation of an (at least partially)
fictional event or series of events through
the medium of printed, prosaic language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

stories consist of three basic elements:

A
⦿ Events
⦿ Entities involved in the events
• “Characters” can be thought of as entities with
human characteristics
⦿ Storyworld or setting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Constituent and Supplementary Events

A
⦿Constituent Events: necessary for the
story to be the story it is.
⦿Supplementary Events: unnecessary for
the story. They can be removed and the
story will still be recognizably the story
that it is
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Are supplementary events really

supplementary?

A

“Constituent events are only necessarily
more important than supplementary events
insofar as we are concerned with the
sequence of events that constitute the story
itself. But supplementary events can be
very important for the meaning and overall
impact of the narrative”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Narrative Definitions:

A Review

A

™ Abbott: The representation of an event or a series of
events.
™ Our modification: The representation of an (at least
partially) fictional event or series of events through the
medium of printed, prose language.
™ Phelan: Somebody telling somebody else on some
occasion and for some purpose(s) that something
happened.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Everything Matters

A

Arguably everything in the text contributes to its impact and
our interpretation of it, and so everything has some
rhetorical function. Change one thing, and the effect of the
whole changes, if only subtly. (Abbott 40)
[M]inor details, parts that are quite unnecessary to the
story—like supplementary events and the setting—can exert
considerable rhetorical leverage on the way we read.
(Abbott 52)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Causation and

post hoc ergo propter hoc

A

[“after this, therefore because of this”]
In the Newtonian universe, which is the universe we grow
up in, effects always follow causes. So there is a good
empirical basis to explain why, when reading narratives,
we should be tempted to apply this paradigm more quickly
than we ought to. The error lies in passing from the valid
assumption that all effects follow their causes to that false
one that to follow something is to be an effect of that thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Another Chicken/Egg:

Cause/Effect

A

It is the effect that causes us to produce a cause; a
tropological operation then reorders the sequence . . . . This
latter sequence is the product of discursive forces, but we treat it
as a given, as the true order. (Abbott 44)
1. Experience pain on wrist
2. Notice a mosquito on wrist
3. Construct narrative in which the pain is produced by
the mosquito.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Normalization

A

Bringing a collection of events into narrative coherence,
rendering them plausible, and allowing one to see how they all
“belong.”
“You could, in fact, argue . . . that our need for narrative form is
so strong that we don’t really believe something is true unless we
can see it as a story” (Abbott 44).
“The unwillingness to tolerate the condition of unknowing in
which we all live may lie behind the ancient and persistent
tendency to believe that some powerful force controls all aspects
of our lives—a power, in other words, that has already written
the story in which our lives unfold” (Abbott 45)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Masterplots

A

We seem to connect our thinking about life, and
particularly about our own lives, to a number of
masterplots that we may or may not be fully aware of. To
the extent that our values and identity are linked to a
masterplot, that masterplot can have strong rhetorical
impact. We tend to give credibility to narratives that are
structured but it.
Masterplots are drawn on to establish the framework
within which the narrative can be seen as credible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Masterplots and Genre

A

Genre: A recurrent literary form [from French for
“kind”]
™ Can apply to large categories, e.g., novel, poetry,
drama, etc.
™ Can also apply to subsets within these categories, e.g.,
picaresque, gothic, dystopian, etc.
™ One text can exhibit many different generic
characteristics

24
Q

Narrator vs. Author

A

NEVER confuse flesh-and-blood authors with narrators.
They are different entities on different planes of existence.
™ Twain: “An autobiography is the truest of all books; for
though it inevitably consists mainly of extinctions of the
truth . . . the remorseless truth is there, between the lines,
where the author-cat is raking dust upon it, which hides
from the disinterested spectator neither it nor its smell . . .
the result being that the reader knows the author in spite of
his wily diligences” (68).

25
Direct/Indirect Discourse
Direct Discourse: Citing a character’s own words (i.e., quotation). (In comics: speech bubbles.) ™ Indirect Discourse: The reporting of a character’s words through narration (i.e., paraphrase). ™ Direct Thought: The direct reporting of a character’s thoughts. (In comics: thought bubbles.) ™ Indirect Thought: The reporting of a character’s thoughts.
26
Voice
Who it is we “hear” doing the narration ™ Homodiegetic: The narrative voice derives from a character or entity within the universe of the narrative. ™ Heterodiegetic: The narrative voice derives from a character or entity outside of the universe of the narrative.
27
Focalization
The lens through which we see characters and events in the | narrative.
28
Distance
The narrator’s degree of involvement in the story she tells. Robinson Crusoe (so far) ™ Voice: Homodiegetic narration ™ Focalization: through the visions of the character-narrators. ™ Distance: ?
29
H. Porter Abbott’s | Unreliable Narrators
Unreliable Narrators ™ Two kinds of unreliable narrators: ™ Those we trust for the facts but not for the interpretation ™James Hogg, Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner ™Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn ™Forrest Gump ™Others? ™ Those whom we cannot even trust for the facts ™Akira Kurosawa, Rashamon ™Vladimir Nabokov, Lolita (?) ™The Usual Suspects ™Others?
30
James Phelan’s | Unreliable Narrators
™ 3 main roles of the narrator ™ Reporting ™ Interpreting ™ Evaluating ™ Unreliable Reporting: Narrator’s unreliability deals with characters, facts, and events. ™ Unreliable Interpreting: Narrator’s unreliability deals with knowledge and perception. ™ Unreliable Evaluating: Narrator’s unreliability deals with ethics and judgment.
31
James Phelan’s | Unreliable Narrators
™ With unreliable narrators, readers can either: ™ Reject the narration and reconstruct a more satisfactory account, or ™ Accept what the narrator says but supplement the account. ™ 6 kinds of unreliability: ™ Misreporting, Misreading, Misevaluating ™ Underreporting, Underreading, Underevaluating ™ Remember: These concern unreliable narrators. ™ Is the narrator in Robinson Crusoe unreliable? If yes, how? If no, why?
32
NORTHROP FRYE
A writer is being allegorical whenever it is clear that | he is saying “by this I also (allos) mean that.”
33
STRUCTURES OF METAPHOR
Each metaphor contains within it two essential elements: • Vehicle: The image that carries the weight of comparison. • Tenor: The concept or thing to which the metaphor refers. The metaphor is the name for the co-presence of the two elements in the form of the two sets of ideas being related and never reducible to either one. The tenor and its metaphorical relationship to the vehicle is not always explicitly stated.
34
ONE METAPHOR EXAMPLE
Come gather around people Wherever you roam And admit that the waters Around you have grown And accept it that soon You'll be drenched to the bone And if your breath to you is worth saving Then you better start swimming or you'll sink like a stone For the times they are a-changing —Bob Dylan, “The Times They Are A’Changing”
35
MH ABRAMS
An allegory is a narrative […] in which the agents and actions, and sometimes the setting as well, are contrived by the author to make coherent sense of the “literal,” or primary level of signification, and at the same time to signify the second, correlated order of signification.
36
ABRAMS: | HISTORICAL/POLITICAL ALLEGORY
Characters and actions that are signified literally in their turn represent, or “allegorize,” historical personages and events.
37
ABRAMS: | ALLEGORY OF IDEAS
The literal characters represent concepts and the plot allegorizes an abstract doctrine or thesis. The central device is the personification of abstract entities such as virtues, vices, states of mind, modes of life, and types of character.
38
QUESTIONS
• Are there ways that RC exemplifies the historical/political allegory? How does recognizing it as a historical/political allegory reveal certain thematic concerns in the text? • Are there ways that RC exemplifies the allegory of ideas? How does recognizing it as an allegory of ideas reveal certain thematic concerns in the text? • Which of Abrams’ allegories is more productive for rooting out larger thematic concerns in Robinson Crusoe: the historical/political allegory or the allegory of ideas.
39
Intentional Readings: | Understanding the Narrative Grain
In intentional readings, one assumes that a single creative sensibility lies behind the narrative. The ideas and judgments that we infer from the narrative are understood to be in keeping with a sensibility that intended these effects. By looking at a narrative as a whole and trying to grasp an intention behind it, we have a way of grounding a reading and making the case for its validity.
40
The Implied Author
An implied author is that sensibility (that combination of feeling, intelligence, knowledge and opinion) that “accounts for” the narrative. It accounts for the narrative in the sense that the implied authorial views that we find emerging in the narrative are consistent with all the elements of the narrative discourse that we are aware of. Of course, when the real living and breathing author constructs the narrative, much of that real author goes into the implied author. But the implied author is also, like the narrative itself, a kind of construct that among other things serves to anchor the narrative. We, in our turn, as we read, develop our own idea of this implied sensibility behind the narrative. (84–85)
41
Underreading / Overreading
As readers, we exercise a power over narrative texts that is arguably as great as their power over us. After all, without our willing collaboration [with the text’s synthetic aspects], the narrative[’s mimetic world] does not come to life. And the price we exact for this collaboration is that we do not simply absorb the information in the narrative discourse but, almost invariably, we overlook things that are there and put in things that are not there. We underread and overread. (86) [I]nterpretation is a form of closure in that it is an assertion of meaning within which the text can be accommodated. Even if the interpretation is an assertion of the text’s multiple ambiguities, that itself is an embracing formulation. (87)
42
Gaps: Principle of Minimal | Departure
Gaps: Principle of Minimal Departure 1. Fiction is capable of both truth and falsity, against the formerly prevalent views among philosophers that they are either false (for lack of referent) or indeterminate; 2. The real world serves as a model for the mental construction of fictional storyworlds 3. Fiction is not just an imitation of reality. Texts are free to construct fictional worlds that differ from the actual world. 4. However, unless prompted by the text our understanding of the narrative world, characters, and events are model on the actual world. • We assume that Robinson Crusoe has two human arms, not eight. • We assume that gravity works similarly to our world on the island. • We assume that the goats on the island are not neon green.
43
Narrative Repetition: | Themes / Motifs
Theme: abstract (love, class, violence, race, the base psychosis of human existence, etc.) Motif: concrete (dogs, the color orange, blood, repeated phrases, etc.) [We might say that motifs are mimetic and synthetic repetitions.] Identifying themes and motifs cannot in itself produce an interpretation, since the same themes and motifs can lend themselves to any number of different interpretations. But identifying themes and motifs can help enormously in establishing what a work is about and where its focus lies, and that in turn can be used to eliminate some interpretations and to lend support to others. (95)
44
Reading and Uncertainty
Probably the most difficult thing about reading narratives is to remain in a state of uncertainty. If a narrative won’t close by itself, one often tries to close it, even if it means shutting one’s eyes to some of the details and imagining others that aren’t there, underreading and overreading. (89)
45
Narrative
: Systems of verbal or visual cues prompting their readers to spatialize storyworlds into evolving configurations of participants, objects, and places.
46
Narrative Space
The physically existing environment in which characters live and move. • We can distinguish the individual locations in which narratively significant events take place from the total space implied by these events. • Five levels
47
1. Spatial Frames
1. Spatial Frames • The immediate surroundings of actual events, the various locations shown by the narrative discourse or by the image. • Spatial frames are shifting scenes of action, and they may flow into each other. • They are hierarchically organized by relations of containment (a room is a subspace of a house), and their boundaries may be either clear-cut (the bedroom is separated from the salon by a hallway) or fuzzy (e.g. a landscape may slowly change as a character moves through it). q
48
2. Setting
• The general socio-historico-geographical environment in which the action takes place. In contrast to spatial frames, this is a relatively stable category which embraces the entire text.
49
3. Story Space
The space relevant to the plot, as mapped by the actions and thoughts of the characters. • It consists of all the spatial frames plus all the locations mentioned by the text that are not the scene of actually occurring events.
50
Narrative (or Story) | World
The story space completed by the reader’s imagination on the basis of cultural knowledge and real world experience • Conceived by the imagination as a coherent, unified, ontologically full and materially existing geographical entity, even when it is a fictional world that possesses none of these properties
51
5. Narrative Universe
The world (in the spatio-temporal sense of the term) presented as actual by the text, plus all the counterfactual worlds constructed by characters as beliefs, wishes, fears, speculations, hypothetical thinking, dreams, and fantasies. • In Robinson, this includes the world of the narrative as well as the world in which January is dead or the world in which January is dreaming and still alive in London
52
Narrative’s Multiple Worlds
All narratives include at least two worlds: 1. The storyworld in which characters reside and the events take place. 2. The world in which the narration takes place. (Even with homodiegetic or embedded heterodiegetic narrators, the space-time of narration is different from the space-time of the narrative events.)
53
Forking-Path Narratives
Juxtaposes alternate versions of narrative events in order to show the possible outcomes that might result from small changes in a single event or group of events. • Groundhog Day
54
Metalipses
• When the border between two worlds is violated. • The author appearing as a character in the narrative. • Audience members interacting with the cast. • Characters rebelling against the narrator • Here, space is only metaphorical. The boundary between narrative levels is purely conceptual. No actual spatial transgression occurs.
55
WINDRUSHER ANECDOTES
Sam King: “I have been here during the war fighting Nazi Germany, and I came back and help build Britain.” John Richards: “They tell you it is the ‘mother country; you’re all welcome, you all British.’ When you come here you realize you’re a foreigner and that’s all there is to it.” Arthur Curline: “It’s true racism is more prominent with the younger generation, this generation doesn’t put up with it; we as old colonials come here and accept it.” Vince Reid: “I never associated with white people in any significant degree, and then school I came across real hostility.”
56
RESPONSE TO WINDRUSH
It happen while he was working in the railway yard, and all the people in the place say they go strike unless the boss fire Moses. It was a big ballad in all the papers, they put it under a big headline, saying how the colour bar was causing trouble again, and a fellar come with a camera and wanted to take Moses photo, but Moses say no. A few days after that the boss call Moses and tell him that he sorry, but as they cutting down the staff and he was new, he would have to go. (29)
57
NARRATIVE VOICE
[T]he narrating voice varies in vocabulary and in grammar and syntax to suit differing situations. To make up this flexible language, Selvon draws expertly upon the whole linguistic spectrum available to the literate West Indian, ranging from English Standard English to West Indian Standard English to differing degrees of dialect, inventing new combinations and adding his own emphases. The language of The Lonely Londoners is not the language of one stratum in the society, not the language of the people meaning ‘the folk’ or the peasantry, but a careful fabrication, a modified dialect which contains and expresses the sensibility of a whole society. (Introduction 13)