Exam 1 Flashcards
content validity
Show the test to experts to see how well the test measures the ability to do the job
Summarize the findings of these experts in a report that you keep at HR
Criterion validity
Not based on opinion it is based on real data
Give actual test and compare job performance with test performance
Is there a better than chance relationship between test score and job performance
Concurrent Validity
Current employees take the test
(need about 100 people to take the test)
Encourage them to do the best as possible on test but they also there are no consequences for test results (no raise or demotion)
Predictive Validity
Rare Because it takes so long
Give the test to applicants
You don’t score it because you cannot use a non-validated test to make decisions
Then you wait after you hire them for a while to give the employee time to learn job
Then you get the result and compare the test to their job performance
Affirmative Action
Have to have your workforce meet the demographics of the labor force
Required for government contractors
Types of Affirmative action plans
Opportunity enhancement- Increase the marketing to demographics that you are missing or lacking in your workforce
Equal Opportunity- Making sure that there is no discrimination in your selection process
Tie-break/ Weak Preferential treatment- If there are two equally qualified employees you favor the one that fits the demographic that you have a gap in. This is only good if the company has had a past of discrimination in the hiring process
Strong Preferential Treatment- Illegal
Reverse discrimination Weber v United steel workers
Courts allowed the “reverse discrimination” because the company had a history of discriminating against African Americans for job promotions
Bakke vs State of california
Strong quota system deemed illegal
Cost Leadership
Companies like walmart that keep costs low
They like to have an efficient structure to hr that is centralized at corporate. HR initiatives are handed down from the top
They tend to have a stable planning horizon so growth from within is feasible because they know exactly what they are going to need in 5 years
HR jobs tend to have a more narrow set of duties
Product differentiation
Companies like apple that are innovative
They do not have a stable planning platform so it is harder to promote from within because they don’t know what they will need in 5 years.
HR jobs tend to be more broad
HR is decentralized and lower level HR tends to make more decisions
Markov Matrix
Predicts the likelyhood of people leaving and moving within a company
Is a helpful predictor for what you are going to need hr wise
Downsizing Approaches (RIF)
Attrition
○ Let people leave naturally
○ Don’t hire people to replace them
○ Inexpensive approach to layoffs
○ You don’t get to determine who is leaving
○ People left behind are doing more work than they did before
Early Retirement Buyouts
○ More expensive
○ Possible leadership drain because you are losing older possibly more experienced workers
○ Better for morale than layoffs
Layoffs
○ Morale concerns with surviving employees
○ You will lose survivors that don’t want to have uncertainty (possibly better performers)
○ Week of pay for every year of service (typical severance)not requiredMay offer assistance to find another job
Strategic Metrics
○ More long term and money based
○ Which employees are generating more revenue than others
ex Labor costs as percentage of operating costs
voulentary absenteesim
real reasonalble absense
involuntary absenteesim
fake reasons for absenteeism