Exam 1 Flashcards
Intro
The Problem of Definition
Focusing on a specific trait or a specific religion can both be distorting.
Intro
Philosophy of Religion
The discipline of philosophy that closely analyzes religious beliefs for consistency, coherence, reasonableness, meaningfulness, etc.
Intro
Classical Theism
There exists one transcendent God who is omnipotent, omniscent, perfectly good, and the creator and sustainer of the universe. This view is common to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
Intro
God’s Hiddeness
God’s existence isn’t obvious. The universe seems religiously ambiguous.
Intro
Interested Objectivity
This is the approach of the authors. It is a position that aims to treat all sides of a debate fairly, but still tells the reader what one’s own views are.
Realism and Nonrealism
Daniel Dennett
One of the “four horsemen” of atheism. Dennett seeks to give an explanation of the origins and survival of religion by using evolutionary biology.
Realism and Nonrealism
Pros and Cons
Dennett acknowledges that religion has positive benefits for its believers, but it sometimes has very negative consequenses. We need to understand religion to protect ourselves from when it goes bad.
Realism and Nonrealism
The Good Trick
Some animals have a biologically driven propensity to take up the intentional stance. This means that these animals, including humans, tend to attribute beliefs and desires to entities around them. This propensity plausibly has survival value, but does sometimes attributes agency when it isn’t there, which explains the origin of primitive folk religion.
Realism and Nonrealism
Religion and Morality
Dennett argues that
1. Religious motivation is not necessary to be morally good
2. Thinking that it is necessary is demeaning to human nature
Realism and Nonrealism
Expression of Religious Belief
Dennett argues that expressions of religious belief cannot be taken at face value.
Realism and Nonrealism
Methodological Religious Nonrealism
Adherents of this view do not take a stand on whether we can take religious beliefs at face value or not. In other words, the question of whether religious beliefs are referring or nonreferring is not something on which they take a stand.
Realism and Nonrealism
Ontological Religious Nonrealism
Religious beliefs are nonreferring. This means that religious beliefs are not really about their content. Ex: Dennett, Freud, Huxley, Durkheim
Realism and Nonrealism
Ontological Religious Realism
Religious beliefs are referring. This means that religious beliefs are about their content. This does not mean that one assumes that God exists. Adherents of this view believe it is legitamate to analyze religious beliefs for their coherence, consistency, meaning, reasonableness, etc. Ex: The authors of the course textbooks and Robert Trigg
Realism and Nonrealism
Buddhist Nonrealism
Metaphysical questions are a distraction that get in the way of the religious life. They are best set aside.
Realism and Nonrealism
Insider/Internal Perspective
If we focus too much on this perspective, it precludes understanding of a religion by outsiders so much that athiesm becomes impossible.
Realism and Nonrealism
Outsider/External Perspective
Focusing much on this perspective can lead to dismissing the possibility of a belief being held because it is true.
Realism and Nonrealism
Double Standard
Trigg accuses nonrealists of holding to a double standard. The religious believer is merely the product of biological and social forces, whereas the social scientist is immune from such influence.
Realism and Nonrealism
Flattening out Religious Belief
When the focus is purely on giving an explanation of the function and social effects of religion, this tends to make differences in the content of beliefs unimportant.
Truth cannot be arbitrarily denied for religion but assumed for scientific explantions of religion. Rather, once truth is denied at one level, it may be denied at another. The assumption that all religious beliefs are mistaken and so their content to be ignored is in need of justification.