Exam 1 Flashcards
Define psychopathology
the diagnosis of a psychological disorder/ mental illness
The 4 Ds
deviance, distress, dysfunction, dangerousness
(none are universally accepted standards and all have disadvantages)
what does it mean to deviate?
to deviate is to vary from NORMS: implicit and explicit rules for proper thinking feeling and behavior, or vary from what is statistically common or typical
rare = abnormal
what are the problems with deviance?
norms change over time, norms differ between cultures, norms violation is common among social reformers
what does distress mean as a mental health disorder?
subjective sense of significant psychological suffering caused by certain thoughts, feelings, or behaviors
strong psychological discomfort = psychological disorder
what are the problems with standard of distress?
distress is not always disordered (grief and guilt are viewed differently)
some abnormal behavior doesn’t cause distress
what does dysfunction mean as a mental health disorder?
if there is interference with daily functioning or any behavior/thinking that is not adaptive
what are the problems with dysfunction?
dysfunction does not always indicate psychological abnormality
dysfunction is subjective
what does dangerousness mean as a mental health disorder?
behavior may be considered psychopathology if it may cause harm to self or others
(suicidal thoughts, self-harm, violent actions or intentions)
what are the problems with dangerousness?
dangerousness is the exception, not the rule
is it always a symptom of mental illness to harm self or others?
what did Thomas Szasz do?
he differentiated norm violations or “problems in living” from organic dysfunction
saw psychiatric diagnosis as society’s modern “myth” to explain ethical, social, and legal discord
how has psychopathology been viewed historically?
deviant behavior has been understood but treated differently over time
people believed they were supernatural and there was “evil magic”
trephination
what are the current trends in treatment?
outpatient treatment - meds/psychotherapy/short term hospitalization
theoretical perspectives - psychodynamic, biological, behavioral, cognitive, existential
practitioners - psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers
what is research?
systematic search for facts through the use of careful observations and investigations
use of scientific method to gain understanding, hypothesis for research design
search for a relationship between variables (quality/characteristic, experience that can differ between people)
what is facilitated communication?
it was a communication technique used for Autistic people and it started at SU in the 90s by Douglas Bicklen
why is research important?
we need to test hypotheses systematically because:
- logic can fail us
- one or two observations does not mean its universal
- many different variables could relate to the phenomena
what were refrigerator mothers?
theory that a mother being cold and not maternal towards her child would cause or connect to autism
describe a case study
investigation of a single individual or case (ex - families or couples)
- detailed description of person’s history, symptoms, treatment
advantages of a case study
there is a source of new ideas about cause/treatment for symptoms
can offer support for a theory
way of studying rare phenomena
disadvantages of case study
- subjective observations and conclusions
- low internal and external validity
internal validity
the extent to which a study has ruled out all possible causes and explanations except the one of interest in the hypothesis
- high internal validity would help determine a causal relationship
- (ex) daycare caused aggression for my client as opposed to anything else causing the aggression
external validity
the extent to which you can apply results to other people or situations
(ex) that daycare causes aggression in children generally, not just for this particular child
define the correlational method
identifies the relationship between variables by designing a study that involves a number of participants (a sample)
- use operational definitions so studies can be replicated
- no manipulation/changing variables –> measure naturally
correlation
degree to which events/characteristics vary together
- assess direction and strength of the relationship with statistics
define correlation coefficient
statistical measure of relationship between 2 variables
- range is from -1 to 1
-sign tells you the direction
positive correlation
variables increase or decrease together
(correlation between height and weight)
negative correlation
as one variable increases, the other variable decreases
(correlation between GPA and drinks per week)
describe the strength of a correlation
0 = no relationship
1 or -1 = very strong relationship
advantages of the correlational method
- high external validity because it involves the use of many individuals who represent the population of interest
- can be easily replicated to confirm findings
disadvantages of correlational method
-correlation does not equal causation
- lacks internal validity (describes but doesn’t explain relationship)
why does correlation not equal causation?
correlational studies do not eliminate CONFOUNDS, which are variables other than the one of interest that might explain the findings
- third variables (foods, sleep, socioeconomic disadvantage)
- causal connection could be opposite of predicted
- could be pure coincidence
define an experiment
a research procedure in which a variable is manipulated and the manipulation’s effect on another variable is observed/measured
- allows manipulation, control, and random assignment
what variable is the independent variable (the cause)
manipulated variable
what variable is being observed
dependent variable (the effect)
how do experiments reduce likelihood of confounds?
- CONTROL
- can compare different conditions through experimental/control groups - RANDOM ASSIGNMENT to groups
- assures that groups will be the same on average - BLIND DESIGN
- eliminates placebo effect and experimenter bias
advantage of experiments
- has good internal validity = can draw conclusions about cause and effect
disadvantages of the experiment
- often lacks external validity or real world applicability because it is so tightly controlled
- internal and external validity are negatively correlated