Exam 1 Flashcards
red flags
Signs and symptoms consistent with a non-musculoskeletal origin or serious musculoskeletal health condition that requires referral to another clinician
yellow flags
Indicate need for more extensive examination or cautions/ contraindications to certain tests/ interventions
category one red flags
factors that require immediate medical attention
REFER
category 2 red flags
factors that require subjective questioning and precautionary examination and treatment procedures
LOOK FOR CLUSTERING
category 3 red flags
factors that require further physical testing and differentiation analysis
CONSIDER ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION
intuitive method of problem solving
forward thinking
interpret findings as you go
more efficient
early dx= likely a correct one
commonly 5-7 dx hypotheses generated
analytical method of problem solving
working memory
multiple hypotheses based on data gathered
reasoning types
probabilistic
causal
case-based
narrative
Tests with low - Likelihood Ratio (-LR) are good to
refute a diagnostic hypothesis
Tests with high + Likelihood Ratio (+LR) are good to
confirm a diagnostic hypothesis
elimination strategy
seeking data to reduce suspicion of unlikely hypotheses
RULE OUT
-LR
confirmation strategy
seeking data to support a highly likely hypotheses
RULE IN
+LR
discrimination strategy
seeking information to discriminate between likely hypotheses
ockham’s razor
the simplest solution may be the best
Dx Requires:
Coherency
Adequacy
Parsimonious Nature
expert practice is distinguished by:
Academic and work experience
Utilization of colleagues
Use of reflection**
View of primary role
Pattern of delegation of care to support staff
hyperalgesia
Increased pain from a stimulus that normally provokes pain
hyperesthesia
Increased sensitivity to stimulation, excluding the special senses
sensitization
Increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons to their normal input, and/or recruitment of a response to normally subthreshold inputs
central sensitization
Increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to their normal or subthreshold afferent input
peripheral sensitization
Increased responsiveness and reduced threshold of nociceptive neurons in the periphery to the stimulation of their receptive fields
Waddell’s signs
TENDERNESS
Superficial- the client’s skin is tender to light pinch over a wide area of lumbar skin; unable to localize to one structure.
Nonanatomic- deep tenderness felt over a wide area, not localized to one structure; crosses multiple somatic boundaries.
Waddell’s signs
SIMULATION TEST
Axial loading- light vertical loading over client’s skull in the standing position reproduces lumbar (not cervical) spine pain.
Acetabular rotation- lumbosacral pain from upper trunk rotation, back pain reported when the pelvis and shoulders are passively rotated in the same plane as the client stands, considered a positive test if pain is reported within the first 30 degrees.
Waddell’s signs
DISTRACTION TESTS
Straight-leg-raise (SLR) discrepancy- marked improvement of SLR when client is distracted compared with formal testing; different response to SLR in supine (worse) compared with sitting (better) when both tests should have the same result in the presence of organic pathology.
Double leg raise- when both legs are raised after straight leg raising, the organic response would be a greater degree of double leg raising; clients with a nonorganic component demonstrate less double leg raise compared with the single leg raise.
Waddell’s signs
OVERREACTION
Disproportionate verbalization, facial expression, muscle tension, and tremor, collapsing, or sweating.
Client may exhibit any of the following behaviors during the physical
examination: guarding, bracing, rubbing, sighing, clenching teeth, or grimacing.
Waddell’s signs
REGIONAL DISTURBANCES
Weakness- cogwheeling or giving way of many muscle groups that cannot be explained on a neurologic basis.
Sensory disturbance- diminished sensation fitting a “stocking” rather than a dermatomal pattern.
5 pain sources
cutaneous
somatic
visceral
neuropathic
referred
CAGE questionnaire
C: Have you ever thought you should cut down on your drinking?
A: Have you ever been annoyed by criticism of your drinking?
G: Have you ever felt guilty about your drinking?
E: Do you ever have an eye-opener (a drink or two) in the morning?
strategies for refinement
Insight/ awareness
Metacognition
Consider alternatives
Simulation
Decrease reliance on memory
Cognitive forcing strategies
Minimize time pressures
Accountability
Feedback
no fault errors
most people would not have gotten it correct
tough situation
system errors
technical failures (poor reading or visualization or glitch in technology)
organizational failures (PT overbooked, overstressed)
cognitive errors
what we can address and refine