exam 1 Flashcards
liquidated debt
no dispute
unliquidated debt
a dispute - once the debtor pays the amount agreed on by both the parties, the debt is fully discharged. can enter into a - “Accord and Satisfaction”
The term ________ refers to the fact that the agreement in question is so unfair that it is void of conscience
unconscionable
express ratification
An express ratification occurs when, after reaching the age of majority, a person states orally or in writing that he or she intends to be bound by the contract entered into as a minor.
An agreement presented on a take-it-or-leave it basis is referred to as a(n) ________blank contract.
adhesion
Consideration
what a person will receive in return for performing a contract obligation.
preexisting duty rule
performance of a duty you are obligated to do under the law is not good consideration.
Promissory estoppel
Promissory estoppel occurs when three conditions are met: one party makes a promise knowing the other party will rely on it, the other party does rely on the promise, and the only way to avoid injustice is to enforce the promise. (also an exception to the rule requiring concideration)
Belinda mails Harold an offer on March 2nd. Harold receives the offer on March 4th and immediately mails a rejection. On March 5th, Harold changes his mind and mails Belinda an acceptance. Belinda receives the acceptance on March 6th and the rejection on March 7th. Is there a contract?
Yes, the acceptance is effective when mailed on March 5th.
“mirror-image” rule
According to the “mirror-image” rule, if the terms of the acceptance do not mirror the terms of the offer, the attempted acceptance is a counteroffer.
What’s considered material terms in an offer?
The subject matter, price, quantity, quality, and parties
unilateral contract
promise for an act
bilateral contract
promise for a promise
Things that are not consideration
Illusory promise, Past consideration, and Preexisting duty rule
-misunderstanding bc you didn’t know any better (as the buyer)
- Contracting party made a false statement of Material fact & believed the false statement to be true
Innocent misrepresentation
Negligent misrepresentation
- Contracting party made false statement of material fact & did not know the false statement was false but should have known considering their knowledge/experience surrounding the matter.
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
- Contracting party made false statement of material fact
- Contracting party knew the false statement was false (Fraud)
Persuasive efforts of dominant party using a special relationship of trust to interfere with non-dominant party’s free choice of entering the contract (voidable)
Undue Influence
when parties have a meeting of the minds, enter contracts voluntarily and contracts are not “unreasonably” unfair
Legal Assent
(w out asset, contract is voidable)
When one party is forced, either physically or economically, into an agreement by a wrongful act of another
duress
(not legal assent)
A false statement about a material fact that was based on an innocent belief that the false statement was true is a(n)
innocent misrepresentation
When a contract is unreasonable unfair to one of the parties through either its formation or operation
Unconscionability
Josh contracted with a railroad company to have his order of lumber delivered by the train the company called Westward. Actually, there were two trains that were named Westward. They were identical trains, but had different delivery times. Josh thought his goods were being delivered by Westward I which delivered goods at the end of October. Westward II had a delivery date of February. Josh thought he was contracting for Westward I and the railroad company thought he wanted Westward II. Will the court void or rescind the contract due to mutual mistake?
yes
A court was asked to void a contract based on mutual mistake. The parties had entered into an agreement where the seller of goods believed that he was to deliver the goods on the truck which was designated as Route 1. However, the buyer thought he was contracting for the truck designated as Route 2. The only difference between the two trucks was the delivery date – the Route 1 shipment would be delivered one day sooner than goods shipped on Route 2. The later delivery did not really affect the buyer in any negative way. The buyer was so furious about the late delivery that he wished to teach the trucking company a lesson and requested the court to void the contract. The court will: Blank______.
not void the contract, since at least one of the elements of mutual mistake is missing
Brenda went shopping for a new computer at a nearby computer store. Her salesperson, Alan, had been told by another sales associate that a free printer was to be given to any customer who purchased a new laptop. This was not the case, but Alan believed the sales associate since he had been working at the store for two years. Alan told Brenda about the free printer, and Brenda purchased the laptop. Unfortunately Brenda was charged for the printer. Brenda was very angry and went to court. The judge found that there was innocent misrepresentation, and therefore, Brenda can receive: Blank______.
rescission of the contract, but no damages
Scienter is present when the party making the fraudulent assertion:
believed it was false or didn’t care to make sure it was true or false
A special relationship in which one person takes advantage of a dominant position in a relationship to unfairly persuade the other and interfere with that person’s ability to make his or her own decision to enter into a contract is known as: Blank
undue influence
Mistakes in contract law:
do not result from untrue statements.
In contract law, a ________ is an erroneous belief about the facts of the contract ________.
mistake of fact; at the time the contract is concluded
Concealment
a type of fraudulent misrepresentation, is the active hiding of the truth about a material fact
Nondisclosure
the failure to provide pertinent information about the projected contract. - form of fraudulent misrepresentation
Rule of state law requiring certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable
Statue of Frauds