Exam 1 Flashcards
What type of questions do narrative reviews answer?
Background questions
Where is information for background questions found?
General sources (textbooks, Google, etc)
What type of questions do systematic reviews answer?
Foreground questions
Where is information for foreground questions found?
primary research studies
What are the two types of systematic reviews?
Qualitative and quantitative
What is a meta-analysis?
A quantitative systematic review - pools data from multiple RCTs
Why are systematic reviews on the top of the EBP pyramid?
Lowest bias
What are the benefits of systematic reviews?
Combine results from several RCTs to create “pooled effect”. Can draw generalized cause and effect from RCTs.
Why is meta-analysis more useful than an RCT?
Pooled data, more power to apply to patient decision making.
What questions should be asked when appraising a meta-analysis? (5)
- Is the PICO identifiable? 2. Did they find all the best available research evidence? 3. Were all included studies critically appraised? 4. Have results been summarized in tables/plots? 5. What do the results mean?
Where should PICO elements be found in an ideal search?
Title of the review
What is the study type of choice for therapy-related foreground questions?
RCTs
What is selection bias?
selectively choosing which studies to include in the syst. Review
What is the first step in avoiding selection bias?
Systematic search methodology
What steps should be included in systematic searching? (4)
- Have transparent and thorough search strategy 2. Search Cochrane library 3. Search other major electronic databases 4. Hand searching of “grey literature”
What is “grey literature”?
conference proceedings, reference lists, hard to find journals, unpublished studies
What is a good rule of thumb to determine if results have been summarized appropriately?
See if two independent assesors were used to extract the data
What table should be included in a systematic review?
Summary table of all included RCTs
What should each listed RCT have a description of? (3)
- Intervention used 2. Number of subjects 3. Effectiveness of therapy (including 95% CI)
What should be included in the table describing RCTs to make the review even better? (4)
- comparison intervention 2. duration of intervention 3. frequency of intervention 4. “intensity” of intervention
What does the summary table of RCTs allow you to determine?
If all included studies were similar enough in design
Why is it important that all studies be similar in design?
For pooling of the results
How are results of a meta-analysis expressed?
Forest plot
What is a forest plot?
Visual aid for summarizing data in quantitative literature