Exam 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What type of questions do narrative reviews answer?

A

Background questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where is information for background questions found?

A

General sources (textbooks, Google, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of questions do systematic reviews answer?

A

Foreground questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Where is information for foreground questions found?

A

primary research studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two types of systematic reviews?

A

Qualitative and quantitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a meta-analysis?

A

A quantitative systematic review - pools data from multiple RCTs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why are systematic reviews on the top of the EBP pyramid?

A

Lowest bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the benefits of systematic reviews?

A

Combine results from several RCTs to create “pooled effect”. Can draw generalized cause and effect from RCTs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is meta-analysis more useful than an RCT?

A

Pooled data, more power to apply to patient decision making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What questions should be asked when appraising a meta-analysis? (5)

A
  1. Is the PICO identifiable? 2. Did they find all the best available research evidence? 3. Were all included studies critically appraised? 4. Have results been summarized in tables/plots? 5. What do the results mean?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where should PICO elements be found in an ideal search?

A

Title of the review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the study type of choice for therapy-related foreground questions?

A

RCTs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is selection bias?

A

selectively choosing which studies to include in the syst. Review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the first step in avoiding selection bias?

A

Systematic search methodology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What steps should be included in systematic searching? (4)

A
  1. Have transparent and thorough search strategy 2. Search Cochrane library 3. Search other major electronic databases 4. Hand searching of “grey literature”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is “grey literature”?

A

conference proceedings, reference lists, hard to find journals, unpublished studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is a good rule of thumb to determine if results have been summarized appropriately?

A

See if two independent assesors were used to extract the data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What table should be included in a systematic review?

A

Summary table of all included RCTs

19
Q

What should each listed RCT have a description of? (3)

A
  1. Intervention used 2. Number of subjects 3. Effectiveness of therapy (including 95% CI)
20
Q

What should be included in the table describing RCTs to make the review even better? (4)

A
  1. comparison intervention 2. duration of intervention 3. frequency of intervention 4. “intensity” of intervention
21
Q

What does the summary table of RCTs allow you to determine?

A

If all included studies were similar enough in design

22
Q

Why is it important that all studies be similar in design?

A

For pooling of the results

23
Q

How are results of a meta-analysis expressed?

A

Forest plot

24
Q

What is a forest plot?

A

Visual aid for summarizing data in quantitative literature

25
Key components of a forest plot? (5)
1. Line of no effect 2. Point estimates for each study 3. Representation of size of each study 4. CIs for each study 5. Pooled effect diamond
26
How are the sizes of studies represented on a forest plot?
Size of box
27
Which side of the line of no effect favors treatment, and which side favors placebo?
Right side = treatment, Left side = placebo
28
What does the width of the pooled effect diamond represent?
total CI
29
What does the size of the pooled effect diamond represent?
Total number of patients of all RCTs
30
What should you be able to interpret by looking at a forest plot?
Effectiveness of therapy
31
Where is the exact pooled relative risk on a forest plot?
Center of the pooled effect diamond
32
What is the exact pooled relative risk?
quantitative measure of how all subjects responded to the treatment
33
What does it mean if CI crosses line of no effect?
Statistically insignificant
34
What does it mean if CI does not cross line of no effect?
Statistically significant
35
How do you look for consistency amongst RCTs with a forest plot?
Are most trials on same side of line of no effect? Do most CI s of included trials overlap with the CI of pooled result?
36
What is the "eyeball test"?
Measure of heterogeneity - look to see if included trials are similar enough (on forest plot)
37
How do you determine clinical significance?
Compare difference between treatment and control groups to an MCID if available
38
What are three strategies for finding systematic reviews?
1. limiters/filters for syst. Reviews 2. Include syst. Review-related keywords in search string 3. know if database has special focus on syst. Reviews
39
Six databases to use when looking for syst. Reviews?
Medline, SportDiscus, Cochrane database, PubMed, Trip, PEDRO
40
What filter should you use in PubMed?
"Clinical Queries"
41
Which database filters by color-coding?
TRIP database
42
Which database does not have a "systematic review" filter?
SportDiscus
43
How do you limit you search to systematic reviews if there is no filter?
Include variations of systematic review keywords (with or without truncation symbol)