Exam 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Divine Command Theory

A

Resolution of dilemmas is based upon religious beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Natural Law

A

There are certain rights and conduct controlled by God, and no matter what a society or government does, those rights and law remain supreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ethical Egoism Theory

A

Egoists believe they should should make decisions that maximize their own self interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Utilitarian Theory

A

Defines right or acceptable behavior as that which provides the greatest good to the greatest number of people. Have to do a cost/benefit analysis which compares all alternatives before choosing the one that is best.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trolley Problem

A

Utilitarians would favor whatever option in which the greater number of lives are saved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Categorical Imperative

A

Individuals should evaluate their actions in light of the consequences that would follow if everyone in society acted the same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contractarians and Justice

A

Veil of ignorance. What rules would you impose if you had no idea whether you would be a prince or a pauper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rights Theory

A

Everyone has a set of rights and the government is obligated to protect those rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Moral Relativists

A

Definitions of ethical behavior are derived subjectively from the experiences of individuals and groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Virtue Ethics

A

An acquired set of virtues is used to make decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Peter Drucker

A

Above all do no harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Laura Nash 12 Questions

A

Have you defined the problem accurately, how would you define the problem if you stood on the other side of the fence, how did this situation occur in the first place, to whom and what do you give your loyalties as a person and as a member of an organization, what is your intention in making the decision, how does this intention compare with the likely results, whom could your decision injure, can you engage the affected parties in a discussion of the problem before you make your decision, are you confident that your position will be as valid over a long period of time, could you disclose without qualm your decision to people, what is the symbolic potential of you action if understood or misunderstood, under what condition would you allow exceptions to your stand?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dr. Norman Vincent Peale and Kenneth Blanchard

A

Is it legal? Is it balanced? How does it make me feel?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Warren Buffett

A

Contemplating any business act an employee should ask himself whether he would be willing to see it immediately described by an informed and critical reporter on the front page of the local paper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Wall Street Journal Model

A

Am I in compliance with the Law? What contribution does this choice of action make to the company, shareholders, community and others? What are the short and long term consequences?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Types of ethical dilemmas

A

Taking things that don’t belong to you, saying things that aren’t true, giving or allowing false impressions, buying influence or engaging in conflict of interest, hiding or divulging information, taking unfair advantage, committing acts of personal decadence, perpetrating interpersonal abuse, permitting organizational abuse, violating rules, condoning unethical actions, balancing ethical dilemmas

17
Q

Steps for Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas

A

1) Make sure you have a grasp of all of the facts available. Be sure you are familiar with all the facts
2) List any information you would like to have but don’t and what assumptions you would have to make to resolve the dilemma
3) Take each person involved in the dilemmas and list the concerns they face or might have. Be sure to consider the impact on those specifically mentioned in the case
4) Develop a list of resolutions for the problem
5) Evaluate the resolutions for costs, legalities, and impacts
6) Make a recommendation on the actions that should be taken

18
Q

Caring

A

High concern for people, Low concern for performance

19
Q

Integrative

A

High concern for people, high concern for performance

20
Q

Apathetic

A

Low concern for people, low concern for performance

21
Q

Exacting

A

Low concern for people, high concern for performance

22
Q

Milton Friedman

A

When business people advocate that businesses have a social responsibility that are “preaching pure and unadulterated socialism”
Only people can have responsibilities
Agency- relationship between two parties, where one of the parties called the agent agrees to represent or act for the other called the principal

23
Q

Edward Freeman

A

The notion that managers have a duty to stockholders with the notion that managers bear a fiduciary duty to stakeholders.

24
Q

Stakeholders

A

Have a stake or claim in some aspect of a company’s products

25
Q

Primary Stakeholders

A

Those whose continued association is absolutely necessary for a firm’s survival

26
Q

Secondary Stakeholders

A

Do not typically engage in transactions with a company and are not essential for its survival

27
Q

How we avoid ethical dilemmas

A

Call it a different name, rationalizing dilemmas away

28
Q

Ice T and the Body Count Album

A

Ice T released album depicting despair and anger that is in American inner cities. In 1992 Protestors grew and Ice T withdrew “cop killer” then split with time warner. Time warner backed Ice T and even did a 4 for 1 stock split. Time warner then moved in a direction releasing movies like free willy. Primary people involved were:
Attorneys
Gerald Levin- TW president
Time Warner Employees
Time Warner stakeholders/stockholders
Ice T
Law enforcement
Resolutions:
Rights theory
Ethical Egoism
Divine Command theory

29
Q

NASA Challenger

A

Launch was set to take place on a cold cloudy day with temps below 30 degrees. Launch had already been delayed several times due to the weather and the recommended temp range for boosters. Booster temp range was between 40 and 90 degrees. NASA failed to fix the O ring and also launch below recommended temps resulting in the challenger carrying teacher and students to blow up. Primary people involved:
7 astronauts
Deceased astronauts and their familes
Students of teacher
Thinkol company
CEO of thinkol
Thinkol engineers
Emplyees of thinkol
Stockholders of thinkol
Larry Mulloy- said not to launch
Alan Mcdonald- director of the solid rocket motors project
Bob Lund
Resolutions:
Virtue Ethics
Ethical Egoism
Wall Street Journal

30
Q

Penn State

A

Jerry Sandusky stated second mile and would sexually assault children. Many people knew about this but never told. Those people along with Sandusky would face criminal charges. People Involved:
Jerry Sandusky
Joe Paterno
Wendell Courtney
Alycia Chambers
Ron Schreffler
Jerry Lauro
Vicky Triponey
Second Mile Board of Trustees
Graham Spanier
Tim Curley
Gary Schultz
Thomas Harmon
Jim Calhoun
Micheal Mcqueary
Cynthia Baldwin
Resolutions:
Ethical Egoism
Rights Theory
Categorical Imperative

31
Q

Guns

A

Guns have been a hot topic for a while. Smith and wesson was number one gun retailer and were bought by a british company. Laws began to pass regarding the size of gun magazines and now more citizens are calling for more gun related laws. People involved:
Firearm and ammunition manufacturers
The national rifle association
Legislative
Tomkins
George Tucker
John Lott
Saf-t-hammer lock corporation
Lawyers involved in litigation
Resolutions:
Rights Theory
Utilitarianism
Peter Drucker Theory