exam 1 Flashcards
what are the two viewpoints defining deviant behavior?
1) the normative perspective
2) the situational perspective
what is the normative perspective?
sees deviance as behavior that violates generally accepted social norms
what is the situational perspective?
- shifts the focus to the social situation surrounding the behavior in question
- relativistic in nature (understands deviance primarily in terms of when and where it occurs)
- the societal response to any behavior dictates the extent of its deviance
what are conformist or non-deviant behaviors?
activities that are mutually acceptable to both (the normative and situational perspective) are the most obvious forms of conformist or non-deviant behaviors
what are extreme forms of conventional behavior?
- behaviors that are negatively defined socially but are consistent with the normative structure of society
- ex. working an insane amount of hours
crimes as a form of deviant behavior
- behaviors that do not adhere to the normative structure of society and are situationally condemned
- these behaviors are both deviant and condemned by statute or criminal law
What does it mean that the relationship between crime and deviance is not static?
- forms of behavior considered deviant in the past might be legal today as well as behaviors that are considered legal today might be criminalized in the future
social norms
those generally agreed upon guides (or normative expectations) for behavior that provide boundaries for interpersonal relations
social roles
defined by a set of social norms for the behavior of individuals who occupy given statuses within society
expectational norms
refer to behaviors that are ideal for individuals who are enacting a particular social role or who are ina given social situation
behavioral norms
refers to what people typically do when occupying a particular role or in a given situation
inherently deviant behavior vs social characteristics
- while some behaviors are considered inherently deviant, the definition of other behaviors depends on the social characteristics of the actor and the social context of the behavior
- ex. drinking alcohol at age 20 vs drinking alcohol at age 21
what is the situational approach’s three-step process?
- defining behaviors (inherently deviant, who defines deviance, situational deviance)
- labeling actors (who is doing the labeling, who is getting labeled, why do some get labeled and others don’t despite acting in similar ways)
- responding to the label attached to the actors
public condemnation
- if the behavior and actor are labeled deviant or criminal, the degree of public condemnation of the behavior, and the offenders can serve as an indicator of the severity of the deviant act
- increased condemnation = increased severity of deviance
societal reaction to the offense
- varies by the severity of the offense, the social characteristics of the victim and offender, and the social relationship between them along with other chracteristics
formal controls
- refers to the official sanctioning of certain norm violators
- typically agents of the CJS
informal controls
- refers to gossip, ridicule, exclusion from group activities and social groups, etc
William Graham’s classification of social norms
- folkways: everyday practices commonly observed within a given culture (expected to be followed)
- mores: norms that govern more important sociocultural behaviors (offensive to violate)
- laws: the most serious form of social norms, used to respond to criminal norm violations (distinguish btwn what is criminal and what is not criminal)
social dimensions of deviant and criminal behavior
- patterned or idiosyncratic
- positive or negative
- innovative or routine
- individual or group
- episodic or chronic
patterned vs idiosyncratic: geographically scattered deviant or criminal behavior
behaviors are carried out in similar ways by individuals who have never met one another, often across scattered geographical areas
patterned vs idiosyncratic: factors increasing the likelihood of deviant behaviors
- sociocultural and subcultural influences often combine to increase the likelihood of certain deviant, criminal, or aggressive behaviors
- ex. behavior & verbal cues, social circumstances, excessive drinking, drug use, etc
patterned vs idiosyncratic: patterns of deviance over time
- deviant or criminal behaviors sometimes become institutionalized or patterned over time, embedding themselves in the sociocultural fabric
- emile durkheim: social facts develop (path dependence)
- more likely to engage in behavior that we’ve been engaging in rather than new behavior without a catalyst
positive vs negative
-Negative consequences on individuals and society at large (deviant behavior is often thought to have negative consequences for particular individuals, and society at large/This is why they are considered deviant and are often criminally punished)
- Deviations from normative modes (In thought and act, deviance is sometimes necessary for problem-solving and to bring about social and political change)
innovative vs routine: innovative forms can be positive or negative
- Positive: Scientific discoveries and breakthroughs, unique literary and artistic contributions, philosophical insights (necessary for the discovery of scientific discoveries/ There is a need to think differently to discover new things, people that did this were once considered deviant
- Negative: forms of criminal deviance (e.g., identity theft tactics, cybercrime, terrorism, cyber-terrorism)