exam 1 Flashcards
what are the two viewpoints defining deviant behavior?
1) the normative perspective
2) the situational perspective
what is the normative perspective?
sees deviance as behavior that violates generally accepted social norms
what is the situational perspective?
- shifts the focus to the social situation surrounding the behavior in question
- relativistic in nature (understands deviance primarily in terms of when and where it occurs)
- the societal response to any behavior dictates the extent of its deviance
what are conformist or non-deviant behaviors?
activities that are mutually acceptable to both (the normative and situational perspective) are the most obvious forms of conformist or non-deviant behaviors
what are extreme forms of conventional behavior?
- behaviors that are negatively defined socially but are consistent with the normative structure of society
- ex. working an insane amount of hours
crimes as a form of deviant behavior
- behaviors that do not adhere to the normative structure of society and are situationally condemned
- these behaviors are both deviant and condemned by statute or criminal law
What does it mean that the relationship between crime and deviance is not static?
- forms of behavior considered deviant in the past might be legal today as well as behaviors that are considered legal today might be criminalized in the future
social norms
those generally agreed upon guides (or normative expectations) for behavior that provide boundaries for interpersonal relations
social roles
defined by a set of social norms for the behavior of individuals who occupy given statuses within society
expectational norms
refer to behaviors that are ideal for individuals who are enacting a particular social role or who are ina given social situation
behavioral norms
refers to what people typically do when occupying a particular role or in a given situation
inherently deviant behavior vs social characteristics
- while some behaviors are considered inherently deviant, the definition of other behaviors depends on the social characteristics of the actor and the social context of the behavior
- ex. drinking alcohol at age 20 vs drinking alcohol at age 21
what is the situational approach’s three-step process?
- defining behaviors (inherently deviant, who defines deviance, situational deviance)
- labeling actors (who is doing the labeling, who is getting labeled, why do some get labeled and others don’t despite acting in similar ways)
- responding to the label attached to the actors
public condemnation
- if the behavior and actor are labeled deviant or criminal, the degree of public condemnation of the behavior, and the offenders can serve as an indicator of the severity of the deviant act
- increased condemnation = increased severity of deviance
societal reaction to the offense
- varies by the severity of the offense, the social characteristics of the victim and offender, and the social relationship between them along with other chracteristics
formal controls
- refers to the official sanctioning of certain norm violators
- typically agents of the CJS
informal controls
- refers to gossip, ridicule, exclusion from group activities and social groups, etc
William Graham’s classification of social norms
- folkways: everyday practices commonly observed within a given culture (expected to be followed)
- mores: norms that govern more important sociocultural behaviors (offensive to violate)
- laws: the most serious form of social norms, used to respond to criminal norm violations (distinguish btwn what is criminal and what is not criminal)
social dimensions of deviant and criminal behavior
- patterned or idiosyncratic
- positive or negative
- innovative or routine
- individual or group
- episodic or chronic
patterned vs idiosyncratic: geographically scattered deviant or criminal behavior
behaviors are carried out in similar ways by individuals who have never met one another, often across scattered geographical areas
patterned vs idiosyncratic: factors increasing the likelihood of deviant behaviors
- sociocultural and subcultural influences often combine to increase the likelihood of certain deviant, criminal, or aggressive behaviors
- ex. behavior & verbal cues, social circumstances, excessive drinking, drug use, etc
patterned vs idiosyncratic: patterns of deviance over time
- deviant or criminal behaviors sometimes become institutionalized or patterned over time, embedding themselves in the sociocultural fabric
- emile durkheim: social facts develop (path dependence)
- more likely to engage in behavior that we’ve been engaging in rather than new behavior without a catalyst
positive vs negative
-Negative consequences on individuals and society at large (deviant behavior is often thought to have negative consequences for particular individuals, and society at large/This is why they are considered deviant and are often criminally punished)
- Deviations from normative modes (In thought and act, deviance is sometimes necessary for problem-solving and to bring about social and political change)
innovative vs routine: innovative forms can be positive or negative
- Positive: Scientific discoveries and breakthroughs, unique literary and artistic contributions, philosophical insights (necessary for the discovery of scientific discoveries/ There is a need to think differently to discover new things, people that did this were once considered deviant
- Negative: forms of criminal deviance (e.g., identity theft tactics, cybercrime, terrorism, cyber-terrorism)
innovative vs routine: routine
routine- acts that do not necessarily involve a concerted effort
- ex. acts of violence, drugs/alc abuse, property crimes
- happening often/having patterned behaviors
individual vs group deviance/crime
-Individual offenses by a lone offender
- Some crimes are more frequently committed by individuals
-E.g., intimate partner violence, murder, sexual assault
- Group deviance
-Some crimes more frequently occur in groups
-E.g., burglary, adolescent drug/alcohol use, some property crimes - Organized criminal activity: Includes organized crime, corporate malfeasance, and terrorism (even entire states)
episodic vs chronic: situational deviance
- deviant/criminal behavior can be confined to certain situations (taking on an episodic form) or can be more chronic
- Some extreme situations can give rise to deviant or criminal behavior in which individuals would not otherwise engage
episodic vs chronic: persistent deviance
deviance or crimes that occur across situations, or transcend situational boundaries
episodic vs chronic: chronic deviance
- deviance or criminal behavior which persists across a wide range of social situations
- ex. substance abuse resulting from addiction
Emile Durkheim
- one of the founders of modern sociology
- argued that deviance was vitally important to society
- in other words: crime and deviance are not pathological elements of society but are vitally important to its survival
functions of deviant behavior
identity, warning of the need for social change, scapegoat and tension release, and deviant behavior provides a means for employment
Deviance can provide a sense of identity
- involvement in certain forms of deviance can provide a sense of identity to people who are unable to gain status or recognition through legitimate means
- example: gangs, they can provide a sense of belonging and identity
- teens who are otherwise unsuccessful in school, who are excluded from athletics, or who cannot excel otherwise are often attracted to gangs because they provide a sense of belonging, recognition, and identity
Warning of the need for social change
- mass deviance: urban riots or organized acts of civil disobedience often signal a legitimate need for social change
- rapid increases in crime, illicit drugs, and “waves” of suicidal behavior, etc. may signal the need for greater societal attention to a social problem
- E.g., the Opioid epidemic/crisis
- Caused by the way opioids were being prescribed
- E.g., the Opioid epidemic/crisis
scapegoating and tension release
- those who commit acts of deviance or crime are sometimes segregated from society, treated in demeaning ways, and stigmatized with labels
- labels can then become the “master status”
- once the label of a “felon” or a “criminal” is applied, it often becomes the master status of a person
Deviant behavior provides a means of employment
- The criminal justice system alone employs hundreds of thousands of people in federal, state, and local law enforcement; courts; correctional institutions; and community-based programs
- Psychiatric institutions, therapeutic communities, and public and private agencies employ a vast number of medical personnel, psychologists, social workers, counselors, and therapists attempting to care for and impact those who have been labeled as deviant
the pre-modern era
- characterized by the belief that deviant and criminal behavior was the result of demonic possession
- people believed that metaphysical and spiritual forces resulted in deviant behavior
- the causes of social behavior were believed to lie within the makeup of human beings and the social milieu in which they lived
growth of positivism
- during the enlightenment, the growth of positivism led to the rethinking of causes of social behavior and the structure of social life
-positivism= philosophical approach to the study of society that relies on what can be observed and emphasizes empirical scientific evidence - faith in the importance of reason and science replaced non-empirical beliefs in supernatural influences
scientific method steps
observation, hypothesis development, data collection, analysis, and hypothesis testing
the modern age
looks to evidence-based behavior analysis to understand deviant and criminal behavior
what are the three traditional theoretical perspectives
- the classical school
- the school reaction, or labeling perspective
- social control theory
what is a theory?
- theory approaches science as causally related phenomena
- a fundamental assumption of science is that phenomena in the world are knowable through our senses and are causally related to one another
what is a scientific theory?
a set of interrelated and interdependent propositions designed to predict a given phenomenon
what is a proposition?
a statement of the relationship between two variables or phenomena in the empirical world
- propositions are subject to change
What did Ronald Akers do?
he was a sociological theorist that set forth criteria essential for the evaluation of a scientific theory of crime and deviance
what are the criteria essential to evaluate theories of crime and deviance?
-logical consistency (refers to the clarity of the concepts or variables that are used to form propositions)
- scope (refers to the “range of phenomena” accounted for by the theory)
-parsimony (refers to the ideal in science to discover the simplest theoretical explanation for the broadest set of occurrences [related to scope, the simpler the better])
- testability (refers to the ability of other scientists to test the theory [this is crucial for a theory to be useful])
-empirical validity (scientifically credible evidence supporting the theory)
-usefulness/policy implications (this is critical, addressing crime is expensive and public officials and policymakers often want to know the most cost-effective means
what social philosophers developed the classical school of thought?
cesare beccaria & jeremy bentham