exam 1 Flashcards
SOAP note
Subjective, Objective, Assessment Plan
Subjective
what the pt tells you. CC, HPI, PMH, meds, allergies, FMH, social hx- my throat hurts. I had a tonsillectomy
Objective
physical exam- inc VS, any diagnostics done before the assessment and plan. ex: PERRLA; tympanic membrane pearly, grey bilateral; mucosa pink’ pt appears in distress
Assessment
diagnosis; differentials, problems if unable to develop diagnosis or differentials. ex: otitis media
Plan
pharmacologic and non pharmacologic management, diagnostics ordered, education, referrals and fu
steps in evidence based practice
- begin with clinical problem. 2. pose clinical question focusing on pt problem and potential preventative service (Problem, intervention/Exposure Comparison Outcome). 3. select appropriate resources and conduct literature search of each key question discussing comparison of interventions and strategies to examine outcomes; appraise for validity and applicability. 4. apply knowledge to pts and their preferences
sources of evidence
- randomized control trials, meta-analysis, expert opinion, case reports, cohort studies and qualitative research provides less robust evidence
USPSTF grades
A- recommends this service. B- recommends service, benefit is moderate. C- recommends selectively based on professional judgement and pt preferences. D- recommends AGAINST this service. I- insufficient evidence
diagnostic reasoning
scientific process in which the practitioner suspects the case of the pts s/s based on previous knowledge. using diagnostic reasoning the practitioner is bale to determine what should be focused on, choose appropriate tests, cluster pertinent findings and develop diff Diagnosis
clinical reasoning
1- identify the problem, 2- frame the differentials, 3- organize diffs, 4- limit differentials, 5- explore diagnoses (use PE to further narrow)
coherence
are the physiological links, predisposing factors, and complications for this disease present in the pt?
parsimony
simplest explanation for the pts findings, important when finding a tx acceptable tot he pt. you are matching the pts CC with a disease and thus tx
system 1 reasoning
relatively rapid and intuitive. based on patter recognition and involves matching the pts presentation to an illness script, a prior example stored in memory. system 1 thinking predominates when an experienced clinician encounters a straightforward case
system 2 reasoning
slower process in which the clinician uses explicit analytic approach. system 2 predominates when the case is more complicated or the clinician is less experienced
heuristics
mental shortcut used to quicken the process of formulating differentials. can be productive in producing results quickly but can lead to biases
base rate neglect
pursuing a “zebra” type of bias where the clinician does not place enough weight on information in lieu of more appetizing information for an easy diagnosis
representativeness
ignoring atypical features that are inconsistent with the favored diagnosis
availability
considering easily remembered diagnoses more likely irrespective of prevalence
confirmation bias
seeking data to confirm rather than return the initial hypothesis
premature closure
stopping the diagnostic process too soon
sensitivity
the percentage of patients with the disease who have a true-positive test result. Can be used to rule in a disease.; ex) a test that’s 90% sensitive will correctly identify 90% of patients who have a disease and will show false negatives for 10%
specificity
the percentage of patients without the disease who have a true-negative test result. Can be used to rule out a disease Most tests are highly sensitive with low specificity meaning the test is good at identifying the disease but can come with a higher false positive rate. For example, mammograms can identify tumors very well but may not be specific to cancer. A highly specific test is a urine dipstick because it can rule out a UTI with no nitrites
primary prevention
activities directed at improving general well-being- counseling, preventative meds, vaccines
secondary prevention
identify or detect disease in its earliest stages before sxs appear- screenings (A1C, mammogram)
tertiary
improve quality of like for people with disease by limiting complications- improving asthma regimen to optimize sx control
leading hypothesis
most likely diagnosis based on prevalence, demographics, risk factors and signs
hypothesis
is generated during the assessment of the pts age, gender, race, appearance, and presenting problem
can a normal exam always EXCLUDE a diagnosis?
NO