Exam 1 Flashcards
Disjunction
Contains ‘or’
implication/conditional
Contains ‘if… then’
Double implication/biconditional
Contains ‘if and only if’
Negation
Contains “not”
Which operators are commutative?
Conjunction, disjunction, biconditional
Conjunction
contains ‘and’
Converse of p→q
q→p
Inverse of p→q
~p→ ~q
Contrapositive of p→q
~q→~p (logically equivalent to original)
~(p ^q)=?
~pv~q
Same order,distribute negation, swap operator
De Morgan’s Laws
The negation of a conjunction can be expressed as a disjunction,just as the negation of a disjunction can be expressed as a conjunction
Negation of a conditional
Conjunction, not another conditional
“If you don’t marry me than I will become a monk” (give logical equivalent) p→q
“Either you marry me or I will become a monk”
~pvq
Conjunction of two conditionals
Biconditional
pq=(p→q)^(q→p)
Universal statement
All, none, every
Existential statement
Some, a few, at least one
Modus ponens
I. p→q
II. p
———
…q
Modus tollens
I. p→q
II. ~q
——
…~p
Hypothetical syllogism
I. p→q
II. q→r
———
…p→r
Disjunctive syllogism
I. pvq
II. ~p
———
…q
Constructive dilemma
I. pvq II. p→r Ill.q→s ——— …rvs
Fallacy of converse
Affirming the consequent
Inferring the converse from the original statement
Fallacy of inverse
Denying the antecedent
Inferring the inverse from the original statement
Formal fallacy
Flaw in the logic
Informal fallacy
Logic is sound, but one or more premises are false
Fallacy of false dilemma
Unnecessarily limits the available options
“either you’re with us or you’re with the terrorists”
Fallacy of equivocation
Results from using a particular word in multiple senses within an argument
Fallacy of accident
Ignores an exception to a rule
Argument from authority
Uses the opinion of an authority as evidence
Argument from false analogy
Error lies in the subject of an argument,not in the argument itself
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Assuming that correlation=causation
Circulus in probando
Reasoner begins with what they meant to end with
Slippery-slope
A course of action is assumed to begin a chain of events
Straw man fallacy
A form of having the impression of refuting an argument, but actually not addressing the subject of the argument
Fallacy of the unrepresentative sample
Biased sample