Evolution of Animal Body Axes Flashcards
2 aspects of HOX gene function
-spatial control of where HOX genes are turned on (providing TF in that area)
-consequences of HOX gene activity (whsat can the TFs do through control of target genes)
HOX genes and arthropod legs:
other arthropods (crustacea, velvet worm [not arthropod, onycophoran])
-have distal-less expressed all the way down the body
-ALSO have Ubx expressed all the way down thorax and abdomen
-there is co-expression of both D and U in abdomen cells
drosophila vs artemia Ubx repression ability
drosophila Ubx expression throughout whole drosophila embryo
-embryo lethal, all segments had abdominal transformation
then took artemia Ubx and expressed it thtoughout drosophila embryo
Distal-less was able to turn on in thorax (though still some transformation)
so in crustacean (artemia) Ubx does not repress Distal-less
change happened in divergence of crustaceans and insects
chimeric artemia Ubx gene containing mostly artemia sequence but SMALL section of drosophila Ubx 3’ end
was able to repress distal-less
evolution of legless abdomen in insects
ancestral arthropod form:
legs all down abdomen
in insects to change to no leg abdomen:
-Ubx change to be able to repress distal-less
-change in where it is expressed - moved posterior to just abdomen as if it was expressed throughout whole insect it would repress ALL leg development
-Ubx would have needed to move back FIRST before repression ability gained
problem with artemia Ubx in drosophila experiment
-artemia Ubx is challenging drosophila distal-less
can you conclude drosophila Ubx gaining repressive mechanism by using proteins from diverged groups?
-change may have been in in nature of D-less enhancer
-i.e. couldve been change in distal-less
-(from hypothesis that states regulatory changes more common than changes in protein coding seq)
Hox genes and vertebrae
chicken v ostrich
ostrich longer neck
because more neck vertebrae
14 in chick (thoracic starts somite 15)
17 in ostrich (T starts somite 18)
vertebrae arise from somite HOX genes expressed in them
Hox 3-5 cervical
Hox 6-8 for thoracic
border of expression between them shifted posterior in ostrich
also changes forelimb position (develop form spanning border between neck and thorax)
vertberate Hox genes and forelimbs
backward shunted hox border in ostrich
Hox4/Hox9 border at somite 20 in chick
somite 25 in ostrich
Tbx5 expressed in tissue where forelimb will grow
Hox4 activator of Tbx5
Hox9 repressor
Tbx5 expression is balance between these two
experimentally shifting forelimb location
retinoic acid soaked bead
mimics Hox4???
tbx5 expression shifted forward in embryo to where bead is
limb grows anteriorly sifted
vertebrates- hox genes and vertebrae
in mouse (and other verts)
-Hox4 - cervical identity
-Hox6&8 - promotes ribs - thoracic identity
-Hox10-inhibits ribs - lumbar identity
Hox promoters and inhibitors of ribs bind rib development Myf5 gene’s
H1 enhancer
snakes - hox genes and vertebrae
divergence in Hox expression in snakes:
Hox C6&C8 expressed all the way down body (all the way up to head - only small region of Hox4 behind head)
Python:
end up with very long trunk (100s somites) with ribs all the way down
no forelimbs
very vestigial hindlimbs in some cases
-change in rib activating hox gene expression correlates with ribs all the way down
-no ribless neck region as Hox 4 is not expressed where 6 and 8 are not)
(mouse:
- neck
- limb at neck-thorax junction
- ribs at thorax
- lumbar)
corn snake ribs
Hox10 (rib repressor in python)
doesnt work same way in corn snake
in CS - Hox10 turns on further down trunk to the end
Hox 10 and rib development in same place
Hox10 relation to ribs has changed somehow
CS hox 10 expressed in mouse
inhibited rib development
not property of 10 itself that has changed
changed of H1 enhancer of rib development gene Myf5 in snakes changed in c10 binding sequence
same specific change in ALL snake species looked at
likely that this is reason for change in c10 rib relation
limb development in snakes
python - vestigial hind limb
some other snakes - no sign at all
Hox d13 expressed in vertebrate limbs at most posterior of limb bud in embryo
one of its functions - turn on Shh signalling
Shh gives positional cues to cellls along A-P axis of LB
Hoxd13 binds ZRS enhancer of Shh in birds/mammals
Hox d13 expression in early hind limb of python too
so later on in python would expect Shh activation
only get weak transient Shh - never goes on to pattern hind limb
in all snakes ZRS enhancer very degraded - many different mutations - even wholesale deletions pf parts
v abnormal looking compared to other vertebrates
so Hoxd13 doesnt recognise this ZRS enhancer in snakes
so no/v little Shh expression
so no hindlimb patterning
swap out mouse ZRS for snake ZRS
SERPENTISED
limbs dont develop
so its not change in Hoxd13 in snake but in the ZRS enhancer of Shh
regulatory vs coding changes of hox Genes
regulatory change:
affect how that Hox gene is expressed
change in coding sequence:
affects how that Hox gene interacts with enhancers of its target genes
(or can be a change in target regulators)
finction of Hox gene expression has changes (like snake leg/rib development)
camera eyes vs compound eyes
both “complex eyes”
large
physiologically complez
v different in structure and how they work
surprising commonality - all photoreception done by Rhodopsin protein
(opsin complexed with retinal- a Vit A derivative)
and are also shielded by shielding pigments
simple eyes:
groups of cells with only these two components
groups of cells that contain both photoreceptors and pigment shielding