Evolution of an Offence Flashcards

1
Q

Conspires to Commit Offence CA.61 S.310

A

7 years 1. Two or more people 2. Make an agreement 3. to commit an offence 4. With an intent to commit the offence at the time of the agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R V MULCAHY

A

Conspiracy relies in the subjects (2 or more) forming an intention, and also with the agreement of two parties to carry out the offence. Only once the two make an agreement, the very plot is an act in itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are you liable if you withdraw from the agreement?

A

Yes, you are a still guilty of conspiracy. Offence complete (Actus Reus and Mens Rea) at time of agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Spouse/partner liable: Conspiracy? Attempts? Parties? Accessory?

A

Conspiracy-Yes Attempts-Yes Parties-Yes Accessory-No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Parties to an Offence CA.61 S.66(1)

A

a) Actually commits he offence b) Does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence c) Abets any person in the commission of the offence d) Incites Counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Parties to an Offence CA.61 S.66(2)

A

Two or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose and to assist each other therein. Each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When is participation in an offence constitute parties to?

A

Before or during the commission of the offence. Assistance after is Accessory after the fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R V RENATA

A

Unable to prove which offender dealt the final lethal blow, all three are convicted if prosecution can prove culpability through mens rea and actus reus. Principal offender nit required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define Aid

A

To assist either physically or by giving advice and information. Does not need to be present. (lookout, give tools, advise when victim leaves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define Abets

A

To instigate or encourage, to urge another person. Does not need to be present. Mere presence is not enough except in special relationship or legal duty or owed to victim or general public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R V RUSSELL

A

Following an argument between husband and wife, she jumped into pool with children drowning them all. Husband charged with murder after he failed to assist. His presence, with relationship considered is deemed approval of actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define Incites

A

To rouse, stir up, stimulate, animate, urge or spur on another person. (sports event)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Counsels

A

To intentionally instigate, advising a person on how best to commit an offence, planning the commission of an offence for another. Specific details of offence not required. (Letter how to blow up safe).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define Procures

A

Setting out that something happens and taking the appropriate steps to ensure that it does happen. Strong connection to offence required. (Use of hitman).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R V BETTS AND RIDLEY

A

Agree to rob, push man to ground and snatch bag. Man dies. Offender and getaway driver both charged, foreseeable outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Chance of probable outcome required.

A

Negligible or remote chance - not enough Substantial or real risk/probable - required Does not require ‘more than likely’

17
Q

Attempting to Commit an Offence CA.61 S.72

A
  1. Having an intent to commit an offence 2. Does or omits an act 3. Immediately or proximately connected with the intended offence
18
Q

R V HARPUR

A

Conduct may be viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops. The defendants conduct may be viewed in its entirety.

19
Q

R V RING

A

Hand in pocket at railway platform, nothing to steal nothing stolen, victim unknown. Still an attempt.

20
Q

HIGGINS v POLICE

A

Growing tomato plants thinking it is Marijuana.

21
Q

POLICE V JAY

A

buying hedge clippings believing it was cannabis.

22
Q

Roles of Judge and jury in relation to attempts

A

Judge decides if act is proximate or immediate to offence. (left preparation and attempting to commit) Jury decide upon intention and if act committed was close enough to offence.

23
Q

Explain Principal versus secondary offender

A

principal - actually commits offence, satisfies both actus reus and mens rea Secondary Assist principal offender before or during commission of offence.

24
Q

Identify two exceptions of passive presence

A

Army senior watches assault. Husband watches wife and kids drown.

25
Q

Discuss Legal Duty

A

The special relationship is dependant on the person who would be a secondary party having legal duty to act and a right or power of control over the principal offender. Husband and wife, Army sergeant.

26
Q

Accessory After the fact CA.61 S.71

A
  1. Knowing any person to have been a party to an offence 2. receives, OR comforts OR assists that person OR tampers with evidence OR suppresses any evidence 3. In order to enable them to escape after arrest OR avoid arrest OR avoid conviction.