Evolution of Ageing Flashcards
what is the inevitability theory about ageing?
this is the theory that ageing is inevitable; it didn’t evolve, it just happen.s The process of wear and tear would explain this
how do we know that the inevitability argument is not true?
because some animals do not age: the urticina felina and hydras do not seem to age. one assume that this experiment might just show that they live for a long long time but when you bring in old ones they dont die there (this was for hydras)
what 2 things dont seem to age?
urticina felina and hydras
how were urticina felinas and hydras shown to not age?
they show no age specific mortality
what is age specific mortality?
the proportion of individuals that enter a particular age class and die during it.
what is the theory that ageingis a neutral trait
this is the argument that ageing is a neutral trait in that it is never seen in nature to be selected for or against because animals always die before it can happen.
what is the argument against ageing being a neutral trait?
but ageing does occur in nature- studies mammals and tired and other groups have been found to survive following reproduction and that survival and fecundity declines later in life
describe a study which demonstrates that animals do age in the wild?
hamadryas baboons: measurment was taken of the age related decline in different age groups in 3 populations (2 in wild and 1 in captivity) this showed that in all three populations death rates increased at an approximate exponential rate- doubling every 3.5 to 4.8 years and it occurs even when the hazard rate was different between the two wild populations
what is the evolutionary paradox of ageing?
that it is detrimental to fitness. If animals did not age its lifetime reproductive success would be higher. SO ageing is not inevitable, it is subject to natural selection and it is deleterious to individuals. SO why does it exist?!
what was the idea about ageing being disadvantageous to the individual but advantageous to the group?
this was the idea that ageing evolves to let individuals that have reproduced cease to consume resources and hence to increase the fitness of their successors- This can be seen in nature in some species of lizard for examples, where the mother is likely to stop breeding in the presence of the daughter but not when it leaves.
what are the two theorists who tackle the argument that ageing exists to allow others in the group to thrive?
wallace and weismann
what does wallace argue about ageing?
Wallace suggested that ageing evolves to let individuals that have reproduced cease to consume resources and hence to increase the fitness of their successors
what does weismann argue about ageing?
suggested that ageing removes old and worn out individuals from the population to make way for the young. Problems with these suggestions include
what is the problem with wallace and weismanns suggestions?
they both assume that ageing already exists
- wallace fails to address the point that deferring ageing benefits the individuals and individuals are replaced much more quickly than family groups- this idea would also apply only to animals that live in groups (not the case for a lot)
- Weismanns idea would mean that resources were made available to unrelated individuals that would not inherit the genes for ageing
in addition to the qualms against wallace and weismanns ideas, what are other arguments against the kin selection idea of ageing?
- there has been revival in the idea that continuing parental care and resource transfer could mea that there is selection for continued survival, not ageing, beyond the age of personal reproduction.
what animals seem to support the argument that there is selection for animals to live past their personal reproductive age?
- orca whales: older individuals are need for their memory and experience- the older females tend to lead pods especially when there is a shortage of food. They direct sons more than daughters but they offer ra great inclusive fitness benefit
- short finned pilot whale- post reproductive females also go through menopause but help their male members of the pod find food etc
- humans also go through menopause
why is it bad for mothers and daughters to reprod at the same time?
when the mothers have a lower fertility rate and therefore should help the females daughters to reproduce- but this again assumes that ageing already exits- becoming less fertile
what is the evidence that ageing is deleterious to fitness?
- in humans, orcas and short finned pilots whales, it is obviously deleterious because older animals can help the group and yet it has evolved
- in terms of animals that dont live in groups- it is also deleterious for obvious reasons- stops them from reproducing
is ageing is deleterious but it exists, what does this mean?
that it must have evolved as a side effect of something else
who was the first scientist to have a breakthrough about ageing? what were his theories?
medewar, he pointed out that the forces of selection on a genetic effect will decline with the age at which it affects the phenotype. this is because even in a potentially immortal species there will still be death from extrinsic hazard, for instance disease, predation and accident. so most individuals survive to be young to few live to be old.
after medewar, who mad the next key discovery with ageing?
haldane- he was studying huntingtin’s disease. he was wondering why selection hadn’t selected it out. it has a late onset. Haldane pointed out that for much of the evolutionary history of mankind the majority of people presumably did not live to be that old, and would have died before the presence of the mutation in carriers became apparent. This means that the selective pressure to remove the Huntington’s mutation from populations is relatively weak. Haldane then made a great conceptual leap… maybe that’s what ageing is - the effect of mutations that have late-onset bad effects.
who developed the mutation accumulation theory?
Medewar
what is the mutation accumulation theory?
recurrent, deleterious, germ line mutations occur (these are known from experimental evidence to enter natural populations at a steady low rate, from errors in DNA copying). Fewer bearers survive to express later-acting mutations because of the impact of extrinsic hazard, and the force of natural selection against them therefore declines with age. These late-acting mutations can therefore reach a higher frequency
under mutation-selection balance. Under this theory, ageing is evolving as a side-effect of mutation pressure
what did Williams suggest about ageing at the same time around as medewar?
Suppose there are mutations are beneficial in youth, but at the price of a higher rate of ageing. More individuals will survive to express the early beneficial effect than will survive to suffer the later higher rate of ageing, because of the impact of extrinsic hazard. Mutations like this can therefore be incorporated by natural selection. This is the pleiotropy (means a single mutation with more than one phenotypic effect) or trade-off theory. Here ageing is evolving as a side-effect of natural selection in favour of mutations that cause a benefit during youth
what are the two kinds of processes given that could lead to a trade off between fitness and youth and the rate of ageing?
- there could be competition for nutrient between, for example, reproduction on the one hand and immune response or somatic repair on the other. This is the reproductive effort model, also known as the disposable soma theory. Increased investment in, for instance, reproduction, would necessarily withhold nutrients from somatic repair and maintenance, and hence lead to a higher rate of ageing.
- Second, traits that benefit the young, such as fat deposition for breeding, could cause somatic damage, in this case through cardiovascular disease and diabetes. In this case, activities related to reproduction cause accelerated ageing by inflicting damage
why are the disposable soma theory and the antagonistic pleiotropy not mutually exclusive theories?
. Both theories predict that the intrinsic rate of ageing is expected to evolve in accordance with the level of extrinsic hazard encountered. They both suggest that ageing is not a programmed process like development - no genes evolved to cause ageing; it is evolving entirely as a side-effect, of mutation pressure or of processes that were beneficial in youth. This may explain why ageing is such a variable process between different individuals.
what are the difference between the mutation accumulation theory and the trade off theory?
mutation accumulation would imply that we can slow down ageing without affecting events earlier in life, while the trade-off theory suggests that a lowered rate of ageing could be achieved only at the expense of fitness in youth.
what organism has been used to test the theories of ageing ? why?
fruit fly- it is useful because as a diploid outrider, like humans, its populations harbour high levels of genetic variation. It is easily clustered and has a reasonably short generation time. Being a model organism it also have useful genetic reagents, such as mutant stock and non recombining chromosomes.
what are the three predictions of the mutation accumulation theory? which were supported or not my experiments
- Relatives should resemble each other for traits related to fitness (ie fertility and survival) more when they are old than when they are young. (age specific mutations will only show their effects once the age has been reached- for example huntingtins will only show themselves in relatives that are carrying the genes once the age that they are expressed is reached) In general the experiments with Drosophila do not support this prediction. 2. There must be mutations that specifically affect later age classes. Most new mutations are deleterious, and in Drosophila they affect a wide range of age-classes, and not specifically older age classes. Mutations like the HD mutation are therefore rare, although they could be common enough to play a role in ageing. 3. We would expect to see walls of death at post-reproductive ages, after selection for continued survival ceases
do individuals with relatedness resemble themselves more at later stages?
no- there are no specific late acting mutations in flies that are related
If you look at new mutations, do some of them specifically affect later age classes?
- you can test this by doing mutation accumulation theory by using a balancer to protect mutations from being selected out. If you do this most new mutations are harmful (lower survival or fertility or both). Generally they do this over more than one age class- very few mutations that only impair fitness later on- huntingtons is rare
do you see walls of death in animals, which theory is this linked to?
mutation accumulation theory- no in mammals there is mortality after birth and then mortality rates increases at a steady rate and then there is an exponential increase - no more than that- no walls of death
why would you see walls of death if the mutation accumulation theory is true?
- if you have animals that are wild but are kept in captivity, they would survive to a point that they would never reach normally- the force of natural selection falls to 0, so you would expect death rates to soar and fertility to plummet
how can you test the trade off theory?
- if you can experimentally reduce the rate of ageing, you can reduce the fitness earlier in life- do artificial selection for those that- allow females to mature and mate- the eggs are then collected from those after 18 days.
- in the older lines then selected animals from the F1 that have survived for 30 days and have still been fertile
you then repeat this for a while
- relative to the young lines there is a change in slope- the rate of death has been decreased- this shows that there is genetic variation which determines the rate of ageing which can be selected for
- in both the males and the females- there was a massive difference inf fertility- females less fewer eggs and they are less fertile. the males are less competitive with sperm competition
- to show this is causal not correlation- you can sterilise them so they have the same fertility and ask if the “young” and “old” flies then loose their differenc in age. This was gone by knocking out the OVOd gene which is expressed in the germline- this abolishes oogenesis. because you have to do a cross you need to do a control cross without the sterilising mutation. you see that when you cross the mutation- you lose the difference in mortality rate which is not the case in the control
give three examples of the difference in lifespan on mammals
- common shrews life for a few months
- humans live twice as long as chimps (50 years for chips)
- bowhead whales can life up to 200 years or more
how long can the bristle cone live?
around 5000 years
what animal can undergo negative ageing and what is this?
- fish- they can grow as adults and become more and more fecund and less likely to die as they get older
how can looking at nature be informative, perhaps more so than using lab techniques?
ageing is clearly genetic predominately and the variety in maximum life span is great naturally than what we see in mutants in the lab
The role of extrinsic hazard:
how can ageing evolve at all in theory; the intrinsic rate of ageing is expected to evolve in response to the level of extrinsic hazard that is encountered. . Does the impact of external hazard explain this biodiversity in rate of ageing that we see?
what is the idea about there being a link between ageing and body size?
We are used to the idea that big things - whales and oak trees - live a long time while smaller ones often do not. But why is this? Does large body size lead directly to longer lifespan, for instance by lowering metabolic intensity - is there some intrinsic reason why big things tend to have a slow rate of ageing, or is there some connection between large size and long life, such as co-selection in particular environments?
what is the general premise behind the role of extrinsic rate of hazard?
the idea is that a lifestyle that has low risk will have a low intrinsic rate of living
give three examples of type of organisms that would be expected to have a low extrinsic rate of hazard and therefore a low rate of ageing g
- flight or arboreality ( life up trees) are though tot have evolved at least in part as a mechanism of escape from predators and would therefor be expected to have low risk
- poisonous defences such as tough outer skins and shells and armour are also protected against predators
- in mammals and birds, being females is often associated with lower risk from intense competition for ames
what does comparison between arboreal and terrestrial mammals show about life span?
- arboreal species have longer lives
how does the mutation accumulation theory and the antagonistic pleiotorpic theory and the disposable soma theory supper the idea that less hazard= longer life?
- mutation accum: dont live as long so mutations can accumulate at a sooner point- as soon as reach this point you start to die
- anatgonistci pleit: processes that pose a short term advantage, say for a few months if I were to use a Shrew as an example, but become harmful after say 6 months, would not be selected out, but would be in animals that are more likely to live to 6 months
is the link between arboreality in mammals shared with other groups?
yes- it is seen in other groups of phylogeny with the exception of marsupials and primates
what is a specific example of a mammal that lives much longer than other mammals?
bats
when comparing body weight to longevity, which animals have a long life relative to their body sizes?
birds and bats