evolution explanations partner preference Flashcards
what is sexual selection
refers to the competition for mates between members of the same sex which has a significant impact on the evolution of certain physical and psychological traits (greater height, facial hair, bodily features)
what is inter sexual selection
one sex chooses from a group of prospective mates according to attractiveness - woman’s choice
strategy of the female - quality over quantity
- females make greater investment of time, resources and commitment before, during and after birth of their offspring
= fussy, wisely choose partner who can offer resources (food, protection) - can be translated today as money and status
- strategy = select genetically fit partner able and willing to provide resources
= males competing for opportunity to mate with fertile female
= sexy son hypothesis - mates with male with desirable characteristics in which can be inherited by her son
= increases likelihood that successive generations of females mate with her offspring
what is intra sexual selection
competition between males
male strategy - quantity over quality
- winner of competition reproduces and passes on his characteristics that contribute to his victory (strength height)
- given rise to dimorphism (obvious differences between men and women)
- larger males have the advantage and are more likely to mate whereas females don’t compete for reproductive rights and so there is evolutionary drive towards favouring larger females
rship between sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour
sexual selection explains why some characteristics might appear disadvantageous in terms of survival but actually give an advantage in human reproductive behaviour - characteristics are attractive to potential mates; either they provide an adv over competitors for reproductive rights
DARWIN - realised the bigger a peacock’s tail the more attractive they were to mates, giving them an adv (also it may slow them down due to the weight)
what are male mating strategies
courtship rituals (allows showing off genetic potential and resources)
size (bigger body sizes demonstrated physical strength + ability to protect partner + offspring from threats)
sperm comp (men have evolved to have bigger testicles and faster swimming sperm)
what are female mating strategies
handicap hypothesis (same women may pick men with handicaps as it shows an ability to thrive despite adversities - may explain why some women are attracted to men take drugs + drink a lot)
sexy son hypothesis
courtship (dating is an important strategy for females to establish a man’s worth to produce offspring)
what is anisogamy
difference between male + female sex cells
- ova are rarer than sperm and require greater energy to produce
- woman can produce one egg a month - roughly 300 eggs over course of reproductive lifetime (25 years) = limited in no. of kids
= lots of investment - pre and post natal
men can reproduce for majority of their lives - reproduce roughly 100 million sperm in single ejaculation - repeated multiple times which means ejaculation doesn’t cost men too much in terms of reproductive materials - unlimited amount of kids
- minimal investment pre and post natal
positive EV evolutionary explanation
evidence - evo expl partner preference
BUSS - studied 10,000 adults in 33 different countries - men preferred younger, physically attractive females (signs of good reproductive capacity)
- females preferred dependable, ambitious, older men
= theory is valid in expl integral human behaviour - consistent sex difference in partner pref
CLARK + HATFIELD
- sent male +female psych students across the uni campus to approach other students + say ‘i have been noticing you around campus, i find you very attractive, would you like to go to bed with me tonight’
- not a single female student agreed, whereas 57% males did immediately
= females are choosier than males when selecting a sexual partner
negative EV evolutionary explanation
low external validity - explanations tend not to take into account same sex rships where children are not desired and thus can’t be attributed to all indvs
- expl for partner preferences can only be used to explain the majority f heterosexual rships
= usefulness of expl are limited
flawed methodology - research into evo expl tend to use self report which are subject to misinterpretation + demand characteristics
= much of the theory based on faulty data collection - BUSS - asked pts to fill questionnaires about their partner preference
= evo expl of sexual selection + reproductive success may lack scientific rigor