Evolution and Genetics Flashcards
What are the general principles in Malthus essay?
Population could grow exponentially but in practice cannot so they have to be limited by incomplete survival so there is competition between members of a population so only a fraction survive and reproduce
How does population growth change
by either individuals only having a 50% chance of surviving to adulthood or only a 50% chance of surviving between breeding seasons once an adult or both
What is another way that stops exponential population growth?
some individuals are unable to find a mate or conceive as then all individuals are not reproducing at their potential rate
What is reproductive success?
the number of viable descendants produced and so is obviously zero for any individual that dies at birth or in childhood
What is the fitness of an allele?
the number of copies in the next generation that a copy in this generation leaves
What will happen if an advantageous trait is produced by a recessive allele?
it will also become more common but the increase in frequency will be much slower than the dominant case
Group selection
The idea that behaviour might exist because they benefit the group not the individual
Wynette-Edwards interpretation of reproductive restraint
was that if too many chicks hatch the resources will be strained which will lead to competition and could mean that the whole population would die out so populations survive better if they can restrain reproduction BUT this argument is wrong
evolutionary stable strategy (ESS)
an ESS is a behavioural policy that once common in a population can not be out competed by any alternative behavioural policy
Is altruism an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS)?
No, selfishness always outcompetes altruistic behaviour
Kin selection
the idea of what extent it us adaptive for individuals to invest in copies of their genome that are inside bodies other than their own and is not just limited to parents and offspring it can also be applied to siblings and nephew etc.
Hamilton’s rule
when calculating reproductive success of an individual we should also add in any extra reproduction by relatives that results from the individuals behaviour and adjusted by the coefficient of relatedness so reproductive success calculated is cashed inclusive fitness
Alloparenting
when individuals invest in the offspring of their siblings or later offspring their parents rather than reproducing for themselves
The Price equation
the evolutionary changes we should expect in a characteristic depends on the characteristics covariance with the fitness of the alleles coding for it
Covariance
basically like a correlation: it is positive when increasing the characteristic increases fitness, negative when decreasing the characteristic decreases fitness and zero when there is no association between the characteristic and fitness so characteristic that covary positively with fitness will increase over evolutionary time etc.
Eusociality
the situation where a whole colony of individuals work together to further the reproduction of one or just a few of their number for example ants and bees
Intra-genomic conflict
when genes in the same individual can differ in fitness and can arise wherever genes can favor their interests above that of the whole
Purifying selection
occurs when an allele that does something useful is fixed at a locus and whenever mutations arise at that locus they have lower fitness than the incumbent and thus are weeded out
Stabilising selection
describes a situation where the current population average of the trait is also the optimum from a fitness point of view and individuals higher or lower on the trait have reduced fitness
Directional selection
leads to change in distributions of phenotype and operates wherever the optimum value of characteristic differs from the average value of characteristic in current population
Which form of selection can eventually create phenotypes never seen in the ancestral population?
Directional
The mutation-selection balance
the amount of genetic variation in a characteristic in a population resulting from the interaction of the two forces
What are the 5 mechanisms leading to the persistence of variation?
- Heterozygote advantage
- Negative frequency dependent selection
- Force of mutation
- Inconsistent selection
- Sexually antagonistic selection
Heterozygote advantage
individuals with one copy of a particular allele have higher fitness than individuals with none or two copies an example is human sickle cell disease
Negative frequency dependent selection
where a phenotype is associated with relatively high fitness when it is rare, and relatively low fitness when it is common and this then stabilises at a intermediate frequency
Force of mutation
for polygenic characteristic the effective strength of mutation is proportional to the number of genes involved as each gene has an independent chance of mutating at each generation so more variation
Force of mutation
for polygenic characteristic the effective strength of mutation is proportional to the number of genes involved as each gene has an independent chance of mutating at each generation so more variation
Inconsistent selection
if the selective optimum moves around then there will still be an optimum phenotype but the power of selection to counteract mutation and eliminate variation is effectively weakened because it decreases the frequency of certain alleles one year and increases them in others
Sexually antagonistic selection
the optimal phenotype may not be the same for males and females so the fate of alleles will be influenced by how they fare in both, it varies according to whether it is in a male in a female body and the net effect of sexually antagonist selection
What may be an indication that selection has been at work?
Where there is no genetic variation in a characteristic
What does the adaptationist stance reason about behaviours that are commonly found in a species?
That that characteristic is probably an efficient design
What proximate mechanisms does natural selection favour?
Whichever produces the optimal phenotype with the highest reliably and smallest cost
What are the 3 main reasons why what we observe in nature may not be optimal designs?
Time lags
The selective regime
Genetic correlations
Time lags
there is always a time lag between the environment changing and the organisms design responding
The selective regime
organisms that live in changing environments would be expected to be able to deal with the changes through for example phenotypic plasticity - the ability for the phenotype to alter depending on the context, we may observe sub optimal before organisms adapt to be able to do this
Genetic correlations
changes in gene can have many different phenotypic consequences known as pleiotropy, heritable changes do not always change independently, a genetic correlation between traits is where selecting for one trait changes the population average of the other as well, this means that changes that are not fitness enhancing can evolve along with the useful ones by being genetically correlated
How do we test an adaptive hypothesis?
- reverse engineering and optimally models
- Experimental manipulation and experiments of nature - comparisons between individuals with more or less of the characteristic
- Comparative evidence - testing across different species that have experienced selection pressure to differing extents
Asexual reproduction
Involves the parent individual producing an offspring that is genetically identical to itself
It is common in many single celled , fungi, plants and even a few animals
facultative sex
Individuals of many species are capable of both sexual and asexual reproduction for example starfish
isogamy
means that the two gametes are the same size and there is no male or female
Anisogamy
when there is two strict sexes and gametes of different sizes
hermaphrodites
they have both male and female parts
Human and bird sex chromosomes
In humans which sex you are is determined genetically at conception- males XY and females XX
In birds it is males ZZ and females ZW
‘Red Queen’ hypothesis
Being of a different biochemical makeup from other individuals of one’s population might make one less susceptible to infection so a selective advantage is having a form of reproduction that makes offspring different to their parents which is what sexual reproduction does, but sexual will be favoured by the parasite too as a way of staying ahead of the hosts immune system
major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
is a group of genes found in all vertebrates that is involved in how the immune system recognises parasites to attack
Wedekind & Furi (1997)
Found that people prefer the scent of T-shirts that have been worn by people with MHC alleles unlike their own
sexual dimorphism
In species with two sexes they often look different from each other in ways that do not follow directly from their reproductive physiologies
sexual selection
natural selection on the ability to gain mates
Bateman’s principle
male reproductive success increases with each additional partner mastered to a greater extent than is true for females
The sexy son hypothesis
states that if there is any initial slight preference for a specific characteristic in males among females then they will co-evolve to both become greater over time as they will then give their male offspring a fitness advantage by then more likely to have that characteristic
The good genes hypothesis
females choose males with the largest ornaments because those males are proving that they have the quality to do well in the current environment (hence ‘good genes’). Lower-quality males simply cannot produce signals as elaborate as those produced by higher-quality males
Bakker (1993)
studied sticklebacks, amongst whom red coloration is a sexually selected male ornament
He was able to measure experimentally the strength of the preference that females have for red coloration in males
He showed that the stronger a male’s red coloration, the stronger his sister’s preference for red coloration in males
This shows that the alleles for the preference and the trait are indeed assorting together, as Fisher’s model requires.
Trivers (1972)
pointed out that, in considering the costs and benefits of mating, what matters is the total cost to each sex of a reproductive episode, not just the cost of the gamete
extra-pair matings
Matings that take place with a male other than the social partner