Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Prep > Evidence - Impeachment & Hearsay > Flashcards

Evidence - Impeachment & Hearsay Flashcards

1
Q

Impeachment General Rule

A

General rule: any party may impeach a witness (even the party that called the witness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Seven Ways to Impeach a Witness

A
  1. Prior Inconsistent Statements
  2. Bias and Interest / Extrinsic Evidence
  3. Conviction of a crime
  4. Specific Instances of Conduct
  5. Reputation or Opinion for Untruthfulness
  6. Sensory deficiencies
  7. Contradiction

1-4 Facts Specific to Case
5-7 General Bad Character for Untruthfulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prior Inconsistent Statements

A

Prior inconsistent statements may be used for (1) impeachment AND (2) substantive evidence, if it falls into a hearsay exception or exclusion (made under oath at prior proceeding).

The witness must be given the opportunity to explain or deny the statement IF extrinsic evidence is used, UNLESS
(1) the witness is opposing party,
(2) not in court, OR
(3) if the interests of justice so require.

Prior inconsistent statements made under oath at a prior trial or proceeding, or in a deposition, are considered nonhearsay under the Federal Rules as long as the declarant is now testifying and subject to cross-examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reasons for Bias

A
  • Family member
  • Friend
  • Enemy
  • Paid by a Party
  • Granted Immunity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Impeachment & Rehabilitation

Bias & Interest

A
  • If a witness has reason to be biased, then that can be used to suggest the witness has motive to lie.
  • The witness must be confronted with the alleged bias while she is on the stand
  • Extrinsic evidence may be used only after the witness is first asked about the bias and only if the witness denies the facts that suggest the bias.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Impeachment & Rehabilitation

Conviction of a Crime of Dishonesty

A

GENERAL RULE

Convictions of any crime (felonies or misdemeanors) where the prosecutors is required to prove an act of dishonesty or false statement are **automatically admissible **(subject to the 10-year rule).

  • Any crime
  • Dishonesty or false statement
  • Automatically admissible

INCLUDES
Income Tax Fraud
Embezzlement
Perjury

EXCLUDES
Shoplifting
Robbery
Possession of Marijuana

For felony conviction - admissible IF it meets a balancing test.

Witness is Defendant in Criminal Case
- Probative Value > Prejudicial Effect to D

Witness is NOT Defendant
- Probative Value < Danger of Unfair Prejudice

10-Year Rule for Conviction of a Crime
* If more than 10 years have passed
* Since the witness’ conviction or release from confinement for it, whichever is later,
* Evidence of the conviction is generally not admissible

(There is an EXCEPTION if the proponent can show its probative value substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect, and gives reasonable written notice of its intent to use it so that the party has a fair opportunity to contest its use).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Impeachment & Rehabilitation

Specific Instances of Conduct

“Bad Acts” Probative of Truthfulness

A

On cross-examination, a party may inquire into specific acts of misconduct if they are probative of the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness.

  • The specific act must relate to truthfulness.
  • Extrinstic evidence is not admissible.

ADMISSIBLE Q:
“Isn’t it true that you cheated on your math test last week?”

If Witness says NO: CANNOT enter math test into evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Impeachment & Rehabilitation

Reputation or Opinion of Untruthfulness

A

A party may call its own character witness to testify that the witness in question has a bad reputation for truthfulness or if, in the characater witness’ opinion, the witness in question does not have a truthful character.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Impeachment & Rehabilitation

Sensory Deficiencies

A

Anything that concerns the witness’ perception or memory can be used to suggest the witness is mistaken

EXAMPLE
Witness is deaf
Witness is blind
Witness has bad memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impeachment and Rehabilitation

Contradiction

A

A witness may be impeached during cross-examination if she contradicted herself by making a mistake or lying about anythign she said during direct examination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hearsay Definition

A
  • Out of court
  • Statement
  • Offered to prove
  • The truth of the matter asserted

EXAMPLE
Car accident @ 4:30pm; Passenger says “the light was green” and dies.

Statement offered to prove:
* passenger in car: Admissible, not hearsay
* passenger alive at 4:30pm: Admissible, not hearsay
* the light was green, HEARSAY

EXAMPLE
A: What caused the injury?
B points to indicate spill
Pointing constitutes a statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Statements that are Nothearsay and Not Used to Prove the Truth of the Matter

A
  • Verbal act: Legally operative words (i.e. I agree to your offer)
  • Effect on person who heard or read statement - “state of mind”
  • Circumstantial evidence of speaker’s state of mind (i.e. I feel sad; I’m going on a trip)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Verbal Act: Legally Operative Words

A

If the proponent is offering the statement to prove an element of a claim and not for its truth, the statement is not hearsay

Examples of legally operative words:
* Defamation
* Perjury
* Bribery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Effect on Person Who Heard or Read Statement - “State of Mind”

A
  • A person heard or read a statement
  • As a result, they had notice of a fact, or motive, or intent.
  • The statement is not being offered to prove that it is true, but only to prove the person’s statement of mind
    (i.e. their notice of a fact, motive, intent)

EXAMPLE - Effect on Listener

Mechanic: Your brakes are faulty
Driver: Not today, I need to go.
P sues Driver after accident
Mechanic (listener) can offer Driver’s statement to prove notice.

EXAMPLE - Circumstantial Evidence

“Zorg the almighty told me to kill”
May be offered to prove evidence of mental disorder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prior Statements of a Trial Witness

Three Kinds

A
  1. Witness’ prior statement of IDENTIFICATION OF A PERSON
  2. Witness’ prior INCONSISTENT statement
  3. Witness’ prior CONSISTENT statement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Witness’ Prior Inconsistent Statement

A
  • The statement is made under oath at a formal trial, hearing, or deposition.
  • It is inconsistent with the statement at trial.
  • The declarant is testifying at a trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement.
17
Q

Witness’ Prior Consistent Statement

A
  • The statement is consistent with testimony at trial
    AND
  • Is used to rebut charge of recent fabrication of improper motive/influence
18
Q

Statement Made by
Opponent Party

A
  • Anything an opposing party states can be offered against that party.

A statement made by an opposing party offered against them (“party admission”) is NOT hearsay.

19
Q

Adoptive Admissions

A

A party remains silent under circumstances in which a reasonable person would protest if the statement were false.

The proponent must show that the person:
* heard and understood the statement,
* was physically and mentally capable of responding, AND
* a reasonable person would have denied the statement.

20
Q

Agent or Employee Statement

A

Agent or Employee Statement is admissible IF:
1. They are made by the agent/employee
2. They are offered against the principal/employer
3. They are made during the existence of the agency/employment relationship, AND
4. The statement concerns a matter within the scope of the agency or employment.

21
Q

Statement by Co-Conspirator

A

Admissible if made during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy. Prosecutors must prove the existence of a conspiracy with independent proof that a conspiracy exists with something other than the statement.

22
Q

Unavailable Declarant

A declarant is unavailable IF the declarant…

A

A declarant is unavailable if the declarant (SAILS)
* States claim for privilege
* Absent from jurisdiction
* Ill or Dead
* Lacks Memory
* Stubbornly Refuses to Testify

23
Q

Forfeiture by Wrongdoing

A

A party “forfeits” both the hearsay objection and Sixth Amendment objection IF:
* The declarant is unavailable AND
* The court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the party’s conduct was specifically designed to prevent the witness from testifying

24
Q

Former Testimony

A
  1. The declarant is unavailable
  2. The declarant had given testimony at a former proceeding or deposition, AND
  3. The statement is admissible against a party or someone in privity who, on a prior occassion, had the opportunity and motive to develop the testimony of the witness
25
Q

Statement Against Interest

A
  1. The declarant is unavailable
  2. The statement is against the declarant’s pecuniary, proprietary or penal interest,
  3. It was against the declarant’s interest, when made, and
  4. The declarant knew it was against his interest when the statement was made.
  • Declarant must have personal knowlege of facts
  • Declarant need not be a party
26
Q

Dying Declaration

A
  1. The declarant is unavailable
  2. The statement is used in a homicide or civil case
  3. The statement is made while the declarant believed death was impending, AND
  4. The statement concerns the cause or circumstances of death
27
Q

Statement of Personal or Family History

A

A statement is admissible if it is:
(1) A statement about the defendant’s
* Own birth
* Adoption
* Legitimacy
* Ancestry
* Marriage
* Divorce

(2) A statement about another person concerning any of these facts, as well as death, if the declarant was related to the person by blood, adoption, or marriage or was so intimately associated with the person’s family that the declarant’s information is likely to be accurate.

EXAMPLE:

“My (deceased) friend told me that HIS BROTHER was MARRIED in 2010.” - admissible b/c concerns marrige of blood relative. here, friend unavailable.

28
Q

Testimonial Statements

A
  • A statement is testimonial if the primary purpose of the questioning is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to criminal prosecution
  • A statement is non-testimonial if the primary purpose of the questioning is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency.
29
Q

Hearsay &
SIXTH AMENDMENT
Confrontation Clause

A

The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause provides the right of the defendant to contront witnesses who testify against him - in CRIMINAL cases.

A statement is generally not admissible because it poses a confrontation problem under the Sixth Amendment IF (TUN):
1. The statement is testimonial
2. The declarant is unavailable
3. The defendant had no opportunity for cross-examination.

Even if the statement falls within a hearsay exception, it will NOT be admitted into evidence.

30
Q

Present Sense Impression

A
  1. Declarant describes or explains an event
  2. While the event is occurring or immediately thereafter

A present sense impression is a statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while or immediately after the delcarant perceived it.

31
Q

Excited Utterance

A
  1. There is sufficienctly startling event
  2. The statement is made while the declarant is under the stress of excitement AND
  3. The statement relates to the startling event

An excited utterance is a statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress or excitement that it caused.

32
Q

Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition

A

A contemporaneous statement concerning
1. A present state of mind, feelings, or emotions
2. A current physical condition; or
3. An intent to do something in the future

33
Q

Statement Made for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment

A
  1. Statement can be made to anyone (usually medical personnel, but not necessarily)
  2. Statement concerns past or present symptoms or the cause of condition; AND
  3. Statement is made for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment

These statements must be made for and reasonably pertinent to medical diagnosis or treatment and describe medical history, past or presen symptoms or sensations, their inception, or their general cause.

34
Q

Past Recollection Recorded

A
  1. The witness has an insufficient recollection
  2. The witness had personal knowledge at a former time
  3. The writing was either made by the witness or adopted by the witness
  4. The making or adoption occurred while the event was fresh in the witness’ memory; and
  5. The witness can vouch for accuracy of writing when made or adopted

A record that is on a matter that the witness once know about but now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately and was made while the matter was fresh in the witness’ memory. The witness can read the record; it should not be offered as an exhibit.

35
Q

Business Records

A
  1. Records of a business of any type (even churches, hospitals, schools)
  2. Made in the regular course of business
  3. Made at or about the time of event recorded (“fresh”)
  4. Which contains contents that consist of information observed by employees of the business (“business duty rule”) or the statement falls within an independent hearsay exception (“hearsay within hearsay”)

A record of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses is admissible if it is made “at or near the time” of the event recorded by a “person with knowledge” of the event. Further, the making of the record must occur in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and it must be the regular practice of the busienss to make the record.

36
Q

Public Records

A

Records of a public office or agency setting forth:
* The activities of the office or agency
* Matters observed pursuant to a duty imposed by law (excluding matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel in criminal cases); or
* In civil cases or when offered against the government in criminal cases, factual findings resulting from an investigation authorized by law are allowed in unless sources or circumstances indicate they are untrusworthy

37
Q

Learned Treatises

A
  • If reliable, a learned treatise may be read in as substantive evidence if the expert is on the stand (and to impeach if used on cross-examination)
  • Note: it may not be introduced as an exhibit
38
Q

Hearsay on an Essay Exam (DIA)

A

Define Hearsay
Hearsay is an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

State why it is Important
Hearsay is not admissible unless it comes within an exception.

Analyze exceptions or exclusions.

Prep (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions