πŸ’― Evidence for Existence of God βœ… Flashcards

1
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ₯‡ 1 πŸ₯‡ πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ β€œThe universe is eternal” No. It’s not. πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ God is the best explanation for why anything at all exists rather than nothing. God is the best explanation of the beginning of the universe. πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… There was an event scientists call the β€œBig Bang. β€œ βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Everything that had a beginning (or begins to exist) has a cause. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ The universe had a beginning. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Therefore the universe must have had a cause. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ The best explanation is an uncaused cause. A transcendent cause. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ That would be God. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… Scientist agree βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Not only matter and energy, but space and time had a beginning in the so called big bang. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Out of nothing …. nothing comes β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ To say the universe just popped into being uncaused out of nothing would be worse …. than magic. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… When a magician pulls a rabbit out of a hat… βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ At least you’ve got the magician, not to mention the hat. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ But on atheism you have to believe that the universe popped into existence out of nothing which is surely absurd. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Seems far more rational to say there is a transcendent cause of the universe who brought it into existence . β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ₯ˆ2πŸ₯ˆ πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ God is the best explanation of the fine tuning of the universe and for intelligent life πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… It was believed that by luck and chance that intelligent life could emerge. About 50 years ago. scientists are realizing that there must have been an extreme amount of precise initial conditions that were in place at the beginning of the universe. Meaning it is fine-tuned. βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Roger Penrose (oxford university) says β€œodds of the initial low entropy state of the early universe obtaining by chance alone is 10 to the power of 10 to the power of 123” β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Life is balanced on a razers edge. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ There are so many ingredients that allow for this earth to sustain life that it ain’t no accident. A little bit closer to the sun, we fry, a little further we freeze. Move any metric just a meter around the universe and we don’t exist. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… Possible explanations of the fine tuning of universe βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Physical necessity - it had to be that way. There is nothing in the law of nature that it would make these constants to be so. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Pure chance. For the amount of time that the universe has existed the numbers of the probability is so large that it is not seriously considered β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Product of intelligent design. Most plausible β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ₯‰ 3 πŸ₯‰ πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ God is the best explanation of objective moral values and duties in the world πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… If there are moral absolutes then there must be a God βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ We are all tied into a moral absolutes. Those do not manifest on their own β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ These laws seem to force themselves on us β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ The harming of an innocent child for fun is always wrong, it is never good. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Every person who says to person abusing an innocent child β€œyou should not.” Using SHOULD appeals to a standard outside of both you and the person. Because a relativist would say hey man, I think that’s wrong but what do you think? Cause it’s wrong relative to me but what about you? β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ It can’t be to just preserve our species. Some moral absolutes don’t preserve our species. Yet it does seem to preserve the individual life. Being a coward and not facing a dangerous situation is never celebrated. Rather sacrificing yourself for another or for honor or for meaning or an ideal is recognized more as an objective good. Hearing someone cry out for help and wanting to help them but fearing for your own safety are two different laws. Yet the one that suggests you β€œought to help” does not preserve you. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ… 4 πŸŽ– πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ God is the best explanation of the historical facts concerning Jesus of Nazareth πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… 4 established facts that are agreed to by the majority of scholars today that are best explained by the fact that Jesus rose again from the dead. βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ 4 facts : His honorable burial, His empty tomb, His post-mortem appearances, the origin of the disciples belief in Jesus’ resurrection β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Jesus laid in a tomb by member of Jewish high court named Joseph of Arimathea. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ That tomb was found empty by a group of Jesus women followers on the Sunday morning following His crucifixion β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Thereafter groups of individuals and groups of people under a variety of circumstances and at different locales saw Jesus alive from the dead. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Despite every predisposition to the contrary the original disciples suddenly and sincerely came to believe that God had actually raised Jesus from the dead. (His followers dispersed in despair and disillusionment.)

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Those facts are agreed upon by the majority of Nt testament scholars and historians β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ NT Wright - β€œAs a historian (not as a believer) β€œI cannot explain the rise of early Christianity unless Jesus rose again (from the dead) leaving the empty tomb behind Him.” β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ The best explanation of these facts is the claim that God raised Jesus from the dead. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ If God raised Jesus from the dead it entails that God exists β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Therefore God exists β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ… 5 πŸŽ– πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ God can be personally known and experienced πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… Aside from just trying to know God intellectually we can know Him through a real relationship βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Sometimes we can get so far into the mind that we get away from experiential knowledge which science has trouble explaining β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ For those in the Bible God was not a philosophy but an experienced reality that actually gave their life both meaning and direction β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT POINT πŸ… 6 πŸŽ– πŸ€” ❔❓

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ ORDER and DESIGN point to an intelligent mind πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… An example βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ You and I are standing at the foot of Mount Rushmore. Would you say, β€œwow! …. look at how the water went over those rocks and …. would you look at that, it’s George Washington up there! There was a storm the next day and oh my it’s Abraham Lincoln!” β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Water and erosion may explain the grand canyon. But ain’t no water and erosion explaining mount rushmore. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Designer jeans point to a design. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ You don’t get order and design by chance. Order and design point to a designer. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ… 7 πŸŽ– πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ The anthropic principle. πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ Anthropic means β€œrelating to human beings or their existence.” Principle means β€œlaw.” The Anthropic Principle is the Law of Human Existence. πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

From

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ The anthropic principle is the philosophical premise that any data we collect about the universe is filtered by the fact that, in order for it to be observable at all, the universe must have been compatible with the emergence of conscious and sapient life that observes it.[1] In other words, scientific observation of the universe would not even be possible if the laws of the universe had been incompatible with the development of sentient life. πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

From

17
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… Consciouness βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ The fact that we can understand the universe points to intelligent design. Us coming to be is one thing. But then becoming sentient and conscious of that fact points to a immaterial reality. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ The fact that we can understand the universe at all points away from scientific materialism. If the universe was completely random why would we know it? β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ There is no reason for humans in particular to become sentient in order for the laws of nature to continue. It is actually counterproductive to the betterment of human beings for them to become sentient. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ No conscious then no choice. No choice. No choice to harm. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

18
Q

❓❔ 🧐 POINT πŸ…8πŸŽ– πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ Life doesn’t come from non life πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

19
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… Never seen life comes from non life. βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Never seen life comes from non life. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ An atheist believes that life comes from non life. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ That is a huge leap of faith for me. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ All of my observation tells me, animal life comes from animal life, plant life comes from plant life, human life comes from human life. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Never once get the animate from the inanimate. Never. Atheist says, oh but there is one acception to this. In the beginning, life came from not life. Incredible that you could be naΓ―ve enough to believe that. Because all of your observation is that life comes from life. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Never one time in your life have you seen life come from non life β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

20
Q

❓❔ 🧐 POINT πŸ…9πŸŽ– πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ Rational Mind πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

21
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… Your rational mind points to a rational God. βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Ludacris to believe that the rational came from the irrational. It is ridiculous to believe that the irrational can produce the rational. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Charles Darwin - 1883 wrote a letter to a gentleman named Mr. Graham. β€œIf its true that our minds are simple developed monkeys minds, why do we trust them to tell us the truth about reality? Would you trust the mind of a monkey?” Even a smart one? β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ He struggled with epistomological nihilism. Can’t know anything, because your mind is an accident. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ No your mind is not an accident. It’s so complex, it’s amazing. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Far more reasonable to believe that your mind comes from a rational being than that it comes from the irrational. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈ

22
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ…10πŸŽ– πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ Meaning πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

23
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… You as a human being have innate meaning to your life. You’re always attaching meaning to your life. We all are. βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Only way you can have meaning is if there is a God that created you for a purpose. No God, life ultimately meaningless. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ If life ultimately meaningless, you need to be committing suicide. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Albert Kamu, the great French Atheist existentialist philosopher said β€œthe only question modern man must answer is β€˜why not commit suicide’” if you are atheist don’t believe there is a purpoose to live, then you aren’t be intellectually consistent and honest. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Innate drive for meaning in life is an indicator that God has left in you and in me that we were created for a purpose. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

24
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ…11πŸŽ– πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ Love πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

25
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… Examples βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Our experience with love tells us there is more to reality than simple matter and energy. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Innate ability to genuinely care β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

26
Q

β“β”πŸ§ POINT πŸ…12πŸŽ– πŸ€”β”β“

A

β—οΈβ•πŸ§ DNA πŸ€¨β•β—οΈ

27
Q

βœοΈπŸˆ‚οΈβœ… Breaking it down βœ…πŸˆ‚οΈβœοΈ

A

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Charles Darwin pointed out that if anything is irreducibly complex, the whole theory of evolution falls apart. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Shows you can’t go from bottom stage to middle stage to top stage because of middle is missing then top stage never happens. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Mouse Trap - slab of wood, spring and a hammer. You cannot evolve a mouse trap from a slab of wood. Irreducibly complex. You have to have all three parts. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ Same thing with the eye. If something missing out of the eye it would not work. So many parts to an eye, if missing one part, won’t work. β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

γŠ—οΈβ“‚οΈπŸ‰‘β™»οΈ (living cell irreducibly complex. Can’t go from one stage to another to another then all of a sudden it’s a cell. It’s irreducibly complex. Cannot devolve to one item and grow. Has to have all of the cell components at the start. They develop and multiply but not something different, the same thing.) β™»οΈπŸ‰‘β“‚οΈγŠ—οΈ

28
Q
A
29
Q
A
30
Q
A