Evidence based dentistry Flashcards
What is evidence based dentistry
An approach to oral health care that requires the judicious integration of:
-systematic assessments of clinically relevant scientific evidence, relating to the patients oral and medical condition and history, together with the
-dentists clinical expertise and
-the patients treatment needs and preferences
What are the 5 As
Ask
Align
Acquire
Appraise
Apply
What is the process of evidence based practice
How to ask the clinical questions in a focused way so that you can FIND the evidence and APPRAISE the evidence [ASK-BDS1]
Search for and retrieve evidence [ALIGN/ACQUIRE- BDS2]
-Know where to go for good evidence
-Be sure that you get all of it
-And you understand the strengths and weaknesses of different sources
Critically appraise the evidence for validity and clinical relevance [APPRAISE-BDS3/4]
-Is it good evidence?
-Is it important from a clinical point of view?
Applying this evidence to patient treatment/care [APPLY-BDS3+]
-Does it apply to my patients?
Reflection
-Can I do things differently next time?
What are some decisions and questions where evidence would be required
-Placing a stainless steel crown versus conventional restoration ?
-Analgesia before treatment to reduce post-operative pain?
-Powered versus manual tooth brush ?
-Recommending flossing to your patients?
-Is there any difference in effectiveness when undertaking root canal treatment in one visit compared to over several visits?
-What are the effects on pain and complications?
-What is the optimal interval for dental check-ups?
What is evidence
Evidence is the available body of facts or information to show whether a belief or statement is true or valid
Study of 1000 patients treated in primary care in Australia
Looked at 22 most common conditions seen in primary care
What proportion of patients received evidence-based care for
Coronary heart disease –
Alcohol dependence –
Coronary heart disease – 90%
Alcohol dependence – 13%
Why should you practice evidence based dentistry
Professionally: It is part of your professional role and a requirement of your regulatory body (GDC)
Personally: you should be informed on how to spot a scare story/ fad/ pseudo-science to avoid you (or your loved ones) being ripped off, duped, wrongly treated, sub-optimally treated, exposed to harmful practices
What can clinicians use to make decisions
Clinical experience
Text books
Patient groups
Teachers
Healthcare research
Popular media
What do the public believe about healthcare decisions
Research funding and efforts are coordinated and prioritized
The progress of research is steady and upwards
The results of research are systematically applied to clinical practice
All clinical practice is evidence based
What is peer review
The system through which scientists/ researchers decide which research studies should be published in a scientific journal
Eg British Dental Journal; British Medical Journal; The Lancet; Nature
How does peer review work
When researchers or a team of researchers finish their work, they usually will write a “paper” presenting their methods, findings and conclusions.
This paper is sent to a scientific journal to be considered for publication
The editor decides if the topic is suitable for their journal then sends the paper to peer reviewers (other scientists working in the same area who have expertise on the topic). The peer reviewers
-Comments on the validity of the study (design, methods, results)
-Judge importance
-Judge originality
-Should the paper be published/ improved/rejected
Peer review means that to some extent the research has passed the scrutiny of other scientists, and is considered valid, important and original.
Peer review is also used to assess applications for grant funding.
What are the issues with peer review
Corruption
Cant prevent fraud, plagiarism or duplication (only in more obvious cases)
Quality of the review process
Skills of the reviewer
Time-consuming
What makes bad research
Not needed
-No more research is required as we have the answer
Poor design
-Wrong design
-Inappropriate control/ comparison group
-Biased (many issues)
Poorly reported
Not reported
How to ask the questions in a focused way so that you can FIND the evidence and APPRAISE the evidence
POPULATION
-How would I describe a group of patients similar to this one?
INTERVENTION
-What is being “done” to the patients
-Could be an exposure (eg carcinogen)
COMPARISON
-What are we comparing to?
OUTCOME
-Desired or undesired
What clinical guidelines should dental professional follow
NICE
SIGN
SDCEP
A child presents with a carious primary molar. How do you manage this?
Complete removal of carious tissue before restoring tooth?
Seal in caries?
Does the Hall Technique for sealing in caries offer long-term benefits over current GDP practice?
Population
-Children with caries in primary teeth
Intervention
-Hall technique
Comparison
-Current practice
-Removal and restoration (eg)
Outcomes
-Rate of failure
When researching for evidence we should consider, have the authors used:
Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
That are relevant to your question
WHAT IS THE PICO:
A child patient requires a dental extraction via General Anaesthetic (GA). Some surgeons administer Local Anaesthetic (LA) intra-operatively to reduce post-operative pain
…but anecdotally some report this is distressing, uncomfortable, causes excessive dribbling and inadvertent lip/cheek biting
Population: Children undergoing dental general anaesthetic
Intervention: Local Anaesthetic intra-operatively
Comparison: placebo / no treatment
Outcome: post-operative pain/distress
-Bleeding
-Cardiac
-Lip biting/cheek biting
-Satisfaction
-anxiety
FORM A PICO
The common cold causes enormous morbidity worldwide and the search for simple and effective preventive or therapeutic agents has been elusive. Even if vitamin C might have modest effects in restricted population groups, that could be important from a public health point of view.
There has been 70 years of conflicting evidence around the benefit of Vitamin C in preventing the cold and in shortening the number of “sick days”. Some have suggested that high doses may be more effective
Population: In the general population (adults/children/males/females)
Intervention: Vitamin C (dosage/ frequency)
Comparison: Placebo/ No treatment
Outcome: Incidence of cold/ days sick with cold
GENERATE PICO:
A 35 year old patient attends for a routine appointment and asks you if she should purchase a powered toothbrush (~£100)- She wants to know if it will improve her oral health…
Population: In the general population (adults/children)
Intervention: powered toothbrush (different types)
Comparison: manual toothbrush
Outcome: decay/ periodontitis/ plaque/ gingivitis
What are the criticisms of evidence based dentistry
The tendency of a group of young, confident and highly numerate medical academics to belittle the performance of experienced clinicians using a combination of epidemiological jargon and statistical sleight-of-hand or
the argument, usually presented with near-evangelistic zeal, that no health-related action should ever be taken by a doctor, a nurse, a purchaser of health services, or a policy maker, unless and until the results of several large and expensive research trials have appeared in print and approved by a committee of experts.
What is risk
The chances of something happening
Can be good or bad
What is outcome
“something” that might happen
Death, heart attack, cancer diagnosis
Tooth decay/ periodontitis/ TMJD
Caries free
What are statistics
Numbers that summarize information
Based on observations of large numbers people
Useful in predicting what is likely to happen in the future
The chance that an outcome will happen
Risk statistics
Fractions
How is odds calculated
odds = number of events of interest / number without the event
How is risk interpreted
Risk of what?
-What is the outcome?
-Getting a disease? Dying from a disease
-Developing a symptom? Surviving a disease?
How big is the risk?
-What are the chances of experiencing the outcome?
-Out of how many?
What is the timeframe? Next year? Next 10 years? Lifetime?
-Out of 1000 people in the last 10 years
Does the risk information reasonably apply to me or my patient?
-Age/sex/lifestyle
How does this risk compare with other risks?
-Perspective- which risk should I do something about?