Evidence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define rule 101: Scope; Definitions

A

Scope: rules apply to proceedings in US courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define rule 102: Purpose

A

These rules should be considered so as to administer every proceeding fairly, eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay, and to administer justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define rule 103(a): Preserving a Claim of Error

A

(1) if the ruling admits evidence the party, on the record must timely object and state the specific ground
(2) if the ruling excludes evidence, a party must make an offer of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define rule 201: Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

A

generally known within the jurisdiction, and can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define rule 301: Presumptions in a Civil Case Generally

A

a party against whom a presumption is directed has the burden of offering evidence to rebut the presumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define rule 302: Applying State Law to Presumptions in Civil Cases

A

state law governs the effect of a presumption regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define rule 401: Test for Relevance

A

Evidence is relevant if:

(a) it has a tendency to make a fact more or less probable than without it
(b) is a fact of consequence in determining the action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define rule 402: General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence

A

relevant evidence is admissible unless law/rule provides otherwise
irrelevant evidence is not admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define rule 403: Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or other Reasons

A

evidence is inadmissible if it’s probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, wasting time, or needless cumulative evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Under Rule 404 (Character Evidence, Crimes or Other Acts), what are the prohibited uses for character and/or traits?

A

Evidence of a person’s character or trait is not admissible to show they acted in accordance with that trait on a particular occasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Under Rule 404 (Character Evidence, Crimes or Other Acts), what are the exceptions for a defendant or victim a criminal case for character and/or traits?

A

a def may offer evidence of the def’s or vic’s trait, and prosecutor may offer evidence to rebut or of def’s same trait (as victim)
In homicide, prosecutor may offer evidence of vic’s trait of peacefulness if def claims self defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Under Rule 404 (Character Evidence, Crimes or Other Acts) what are the prohibited uses for crimes, wrongs, and other acts?

A

not admissible to prove a person’s character (to show they acted in accordance with that character on a particular occasion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Under Rule 404 (Character Evidence, Crimes or Other Acts), when may a crime or other act be used in a criminal case?

A

for another purpose (motive, intent, plan, knowledge…), Prosecutor must provide reasonable notice before trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two “Methods of Proving Character” under rule 405?

A

(a) by reputation or opinion: when character is admissible, it may be proved by opinion, on cross-x inquiry into specific instances is allowed
(b) by specific instances of conduct: when character is an essential element to a charge, claim, or defense, character may be proved by specific instances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define rule 406: Habit, Routine Practice

A

may be admitted to prove that on a particular occasion a party acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the factors is determining whether something is a habit or a routine practice under rule 406?

A

(1) specificity of conduct
(2) distinctness of the situation
(3) regularity of conduct

17
Q

Define rule 407: Subsequent Remedial Measures

A

not admissible to prove: negligence, culpability, defect in a product/design, need for a warning, but may be used for impeachment or, if disputed, ownership, control, feasibility of precautionary measures

18
Q

Define rule 408: Compromising Offers and Negotiations

A

not admissible to either to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim, or to impeach by a prior statement or a contradiction

19
Q

Define rule 409: Offers to Pay Medical and Similar Expenses

A

not admissible to prove liability for the injury

20
Q

Define rule 410: Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements

A

not admissible unless another statement has been offered from the same discussion, or in a perjury proceeding

21
Q

Define rule 411: Liability Insurance

A

not admissible to prove whether the person acted negligently or wrongfully. May be used to prove agency, control, or witness bias

22
Q

Define rule 412. Sex-Offense Cases: The Victim’s Sexual Behavior or Predisposition

A

may not be used except in crim cases to prove someone else was the source of semen, previous sexual conduct with def, or evidence whose exclusion would violate def’s constitutional rights