Evidence Flashcards
(76 cards)
What are the three categories of Rules of Evidence?
1 - How evidence may be given
2 - Who may give evidence
3 - What type of material may be given in evidence
What makes evidence relevant?
If it has a tendency to prove or disprove anything of consequence to the determination of a proceeding
What are the “facts in issue”?
The facts that the prosecution must prove in order to establish the elements of the offence OR those which the defendant must prove for a defense if they have the burden of proof
What are some examples of unfair prejudice?
Danger that jury will give more weight to evidence than it deserves, be misled by the evidence, use the evidence for an illegitimate purpose
The ordinary way of giving evidence is to give it orally in court or via a filed affidavit if consented to by all paerties. What are some examples of giving evidence in an alternative way?
- In the Courtroom but unable to see the defendant eg screen
- AV link
- In a separate room
Define witness
A person who gives evidence and is able to be cross examined
Define child complainant
A complainant who is under 18 years at the time the charging document is filed.
What is a hearsay statement?
A statement made by somebody who isn’t a witness eg a Police officer giving evidence of what somebody has told him.
What is veracity?
Someones disposition to refrain from lying
What is direct evidence?
Any evidence offered by a witness which they have seen, heard or experienced eg an assault victims account of the incident
What is circumstantial evidence?
Evidence of circumstances that do not directly prove any fact in issue but which allow inferences about the existence of those facts to be drawn
What is the purpose of evidence law?
To secure the just determination of proceedings
What is the fundamental rule around the admissibility of relevant evidence?
All relevant evidence, subject to any inadmissibility rules, will be admissible.
- Non relevant evidence will be inadmissible
What is the s8 rule around Fairness and exclusion? (Balancing test)
- Evidence may be excluded if it would result in some unfair prejudice in the proceeding
- Otherwise admissible evidence may be ruled inadmissible if it was obtained unfairly
- Evidence that will needlessly prolong the proceeding will also be excluded
If both parties agree can inadmissible evidence be allowed? (s9)
Yep if the judge agrees. s9 also allows defense and prosecution to agree to facts not in dispute
What is the Woolmington principle?
The presumption of innocence until proven guilty
How do defenses differ from just denying the incident? IE evidential burden
Once the prosecution have proved the facts and the defense want to bring up a defense to those facts (rather than just missing the actus reas and mens rea) eg self defense. They must raise that defense as a “live issue rather than getting the judge or jury to infer it. This is their evidential burden. Prosecution then have the burden of proof to negate that defense
What are the standards of proof for prosecution and defense?
Prosecution - beyond reasonable doubt
Defense - on the balance of probilities
What is reasonable doubt?
An honest and reasonable uncertainty left in your mind about the guilt of the accused after you have given careful and impartial consideration to all of the evidence
Can one witnesses testimony be enough to prove a case?
Yes, provided that the court is satisfied that their evidence is reliable and accurate. The only exceptions are perjury and treason which both require corroboration.
Is there a requirement for judges to warn a jury about the dangers of uncorroborated evidence?
No, subject to s122 where a judge may warn a jury of the need for caution if they are of the opinion that uncorroborated evidence may be unreliable. They may also consider a similar warning for hearsay evidence.
Can a judge give a corroboration warning to a jury in cases involving child complaints?
Only if the same warning would have been given if the complainant was an adult
Who takes an oath or affirmation?
Any witness aged 12 and over. Witnesses under 12 make a promise to tell the truth
Can a witness give evidence without taking an oath?
With the judges permission (they still make a promise to tell the truth and are treated as if they gave an oath)