Evidence Flashcards
What are the 6 self-authenticating documents (i.e. no need to est. foundation)?
Self-Authenticating Documents… 1) Official gov’t publications 2) Certified copies of public OR private records on file in public office (e.g. a mtg/deed is a PRIVATE document that is filed in a public office) 3) Newspapers or mags 4) Trade inscriptions and labels (e.g. a label on a bottle of water) 5) Notarized (aka “acknowledged”) document 6) Commercial paper (i.e. the signatures are deemed genuine) 7) Certified business records (also admissable under hearsay) Don’t forget about hearsay!!
What are the 4 methods ofauthentication? NOTE: NY Distinction
Methods… 1) Witness’ personal knowledge (e.g. witness observed X sign the document; can verify the photograph) 2) Proof of handwriting by…. Lay person opinion (e.g. verifies based on familarity w/ handwriting); Expert comparison opinion (e.g. handwriting expert); OR Jury comparison (e.g. compare document w/ example of X’s handwriting) 3) Ancient document rule: authenticity may be inferred IF the document is… ≥ 20 yrs old [NY DISTINCTION: document must be ≥ 30 yrs old]; facially free of suspicion; AND found in natural place 4) Solicited Reply Doctrine: doc can be authenticated by evidence that it was received in response to a prior communication to the alleged author (e.g., π mails K offer to ∆, properly addressed and posted, and later receives an acceptance purportedly signed by X)
What are the3 questions you need to ask for document/photo evidence?
- Has it been authenticated? 2. Is it the best-evidence? 3. Is there hearsay?
When is a document admissible (based on its authenticity)?
The Conditional Relevancy Std:A document is admissible if ct determines that there is suffiicent evidence from which a reasonable juror could conclude doc is genuine
What is the purpose of the authentication?
If the relevance of a writing or picture depends on its source or authorship, a showing must be made that the writing is authentic (genuine) This process is “laying foundation”
What is the Best Evidence Rule?
Best Evidence Rule: A party who seeks to prove the contents of a writing must EITHER: (i) PRODUCE the “original writing”; OR (ii) provide an ACCEPTABLE EXCUSE for its absence (and provide secondary testimony like oral testimony or copy) “Writing” includes sound recordings, X-rays, and films
When does the Best Evidence Rule apply?
When a party is seeking to prove the contents of a writing in TWO situations… 1) the writing is a legally operative document in the present case (e.g. patent, deed, mtg, divorce decree, writen K) 2) witness is testifying to facts that she learned SOLELY from reading about them in a writing (BUT, not when witness has PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE independent of doc)
What is an original writing? NOTE: NY distinction
Original writing is a 1) writing or its counterpart; 2) negative of film or print; 3) print-out of computer data; OR 4) photocopy (mechanical) Photocopies are admissible (to same extent as original) UNLESS it would be UNFAIR(e.g. a fuzzy photocopy) or there is a genuine question as to its AUTHENTICITY NY DISTINCTION: photocopies are acceptable BUT only if the copies were made in ordinary course of business (i.e. not made for only for litigation) NOTE: an original is NOT a handwritten copy
What counts as a valid EXCUSE for non-production of original writing (under Best Evidence Rule)?
Excuses for non-production of ORIGINAL: 1) lost & can’t be found w/ due diligence; 2) destroyed w/o bad faith; 3) can’t be obtained w/ legal process (beyond ct’s subpoena pwr) NOTE: Secondary evidence would still be necessary if an excuse is est. The ct has to be PERSUADED by a perponderance of the evidence that an excuse has been est.
When does the Best Evidence Rule NOT apply?
BER does NOT apply when… 1) voluminous records can be presented viasummary or chart; PROVIDED orignal records would be admissible and are available for inspection 2) certified copies of public records 3) collateral docs (i.e. docs not important for case) can be proven by secondary evidence
What is the “public records” exception to hearsay? NOTE: NY Distinction
Allows as ADMISSIABLE any public record of a public office or agency setting forth: 1) the activities of the office/agency (e.g. payroll records); OR 2) matters observed p/t a duty imposed by law; OR 3) findings of fact or opinion resulting from an investigation authorized by law (even if info come fron an outsider) EXCEPTION: the public record exception does NOT include police reports prepared for prosecutorial purposes against a CRIMINAL ∆ NY DISTINCTION: this doctrine is NOT well developed in NY; conclusions/opinions contained in a gov’t report are admissable ONLY IF (i) the report sets forth adequate facts; AND (ii) the person giving the opinion is qualified
What are 2 categoriesout-of-court statements asserted for their truth that are STILL admissible as “nonhearsay”? NOTE: NY Distinction
Nonhearsay = nws meeting CL definition of hearsay (they ARE stmts offered to prove the matter asserted), certain stmts are STILL admissible… 1) Certain pior statements of trial witness: Witness’s prior stmt of ID of a person after seeing him Witness’s prior inconsistent stmt if (i) oral; (ii) under oath; AND (iii) made during formal testimonial hearing» serves impeachment AND as substantive evidence NY DISTICTION: In NY this ONLY serves impeachment purpose Witness’s prior consistent stmt if being used to rebut a charge of recent fabrication or improper motive»_space; serves rehabilitation AND as substantive evidence NY DISTICTION: In NY this ONLY serves rehabilitation purpose 2) Party admissions aka Stmt of Opposing Party Any stmt (personal knowledge by declarant is NOT necessary) made by the opposing party is admissible if it is offered against the opposing party Adoptive admission: if a party expressly or impliedly adopts a stmt made by another person, it is AS THOUGH the party herself made the stmt Vicarious party admission: stmt by AGENT/EMP is admissible against principal/employer IF (i) the stmt concerns matters w/in scope of agency/employment; AND (ii) is made during the existence of the agency/employment relationship NY DISTINCTION: stmt is admissible against principal/employer ONLY IF the principal/employer gave agent the authority (express or implied) to speak on the matter Co-conspirator’s stmts: a stmt of a co-conspirator is admissible against a party who was a member of the conspiracy IF the stmt was made (i) during; AND (ii) in furtherance of the conspiracy
What is the “declaration of intent” exception to hearsay? NOTE: NY Distinction
Statement of intent by declarant to do something (i) in the future; OR(ii) w/another person. NY DISTINCTION: IF stmt is offered to prove JOINT particpation of another person, NY requires (1) corroboration of prior connection between declarant and other person; AND (2) requires unavailability
What are the 12 key EXCEPTIONS to the hearsay rule?
1) Excited utterance 2) Present sense impression 3) Present state of mind 4) Declaration of intent 5) Present physical condition 6) Stmt for the purpose of obtaining medical treatment/diagnosis 7) Business records 8) Public records Requiring UNAVAILABITY of declarant… 9) Forfeiture by wrongdoing (in 6th Am confrontation req on hearsay rules) 10) Former testimony 11) Statement against interest 12) Dying declaration
How can a party impeach a hearsay declarant?
ANY impeachment method may be used to attack the credibility of a hearsay declarant whose stmt was admitted into evidence
What is the “former testimony” exception to hearsay?
Former testimony of a now-unavailablewitness, from prior proceeding/dep is ADMISSABLE against a party who had: 1) Opportunity andmotive to cross the witness; AND 2) The issue was essentially the same NOTE: Don’t confuse w/prior inconsistent statementunder oath in formal proceeding = nonhearsay exclusion.
What is the “present state of mind” exception to hearsay?
Contemporaneous statement concerning declarant’s present state of mind, feelings, emotions, or INTENT (i.e. unique knowledge) NOTE: Can overlap w/ non-hearsay exclusion forcircumstantial evidence of declarant’s state of mind (e.g. insane)
What are the grounds for UNAVAILABILITY as required by certain hearsay exceptions? NOTE: NY Distinction
1) Privilege 2) Absence from the jx: (i) can’t find declarant w/ due diligence; OR (ii) declarant is beyond ct’s subpoena pwr 3) Illness or death 4) Lack of memory 5) Declarant’srefusal to testify (even if they’d be in contempt) NY has two ADDITIONAL grounds for unavailability (for CIVIL CASES ONLY)… 6) Declarant is > 100 miles from ct house 7) Declarant is a physician (public policy favors that the dr. continues their work rather than testify AGAIN)
What is the “medical/diagnoisis” exception to hearsay? NOTE: NY Distinction
Statement is admissible IF Made: 1) To medical personnel (e.g. doc, nurse, EMT, psychologist); 2) Concerning past/present symptoms OR GENERAL cause of condition; AND 3) For the purpose of diagnosis/treatment NOTE: this exception DOES NOT include stmts in which the declarant IDENTIFIES a tortfeasor or DESCRIBES the nature of alleged liability (i.e. it’s not relevant to treatment) UNLESS it’s an ID of an abuser in a domestic/child context NY DISTINCTION: this exception does NOT apply to stmts made to a physcian SOLELY for the purpose of helping the physican to develop an opinion for expert testimnoy at trial
What is the “present sense impression” exception to hearsay? NOTE: NY Distinction
Virtually contemporaneous stmt made WHILE event is occurring OR immediately thereafter (descriptive but not necessarily emotional) NY DISTINCTION: requires corroborating evidence of the contents of the present sense impression
When is a “statement” subject to the hearsay exclusion rule?
STEP 1: Is the stmt offered to prove the matter asserted? [No = (i) legally operative words; (ii) stmts offered to show effect on hearer/reader; (iii) stmts offered to show declarant’s state of mind] YES: STEP 2 NO: NOT HEARSAY, so not subject to hearsay exclusion rule STEP 2: Is the stmt a nonhearsay exclusion? [Exclusion = (i) prior inconsistent stmt given under oath; (ii) prior consistent stmt used to rebut a charge that witness is lying/has improper motive; (iii) stmt of ID of a person; (iv) party admission] YES: NONHEARSAY, so not subject to hearsay exclusion NO: STEP 3 STEP 3: Does a hearsay exception apply? [(i) excited utterance; (ii) present sense impression; (iii) present state of mind; (iv) declaration of intent; (v) present physical condition; (vi) stmt for medical treatment; (vii) business records; (viii) public records; (ix) former testimony; (x) stmt against interest; (xi) dying declaration (xii) forfeiture] YES: ADMISSIBLE, provided it’s not excluded under any other rules (e.g. best evidence, relevancy, etc) NO: INADMISSIBLE, stmt IS excluded by hearsay rule
What is the “dying declaration” exception to hearsay? NOTE: NY Distinction
Statement by a now-UNAVAILABLE declarant is admissible IF made: 1) In ALL civil cases OR homicide (criminal) case; NY DISTINCTION: ONLY available in criminal HOMICIDE cases 2) the declarant is under belief of impending & certain DEATH; AND 3) stmt is concerning cause or circumstances of declarant’s death
What is the “excited utterance” exception to hearsay?
Excited Utterance is a stmt: 1) Concerning startling event; 2) While declarant is still under stress of excitement it caused. Factors to consider… the nature of the event the passage of time (no bright line but >1hr is less likely to be valid) NOTE: if the fact pattern look for: (i) exclamatory language; (ii) excitement-oriented verbs; AND (iii) EXCLAMATION PTS!!!
What is the “present physical condition” exception to hearsay? NOTE: NY Distinction
Statement made to ANYONEaboutdeclarant’s current physical condition NY DISTINCTION: requires unavailability, if the stmt is made to a LAYPERSON (vs. medical professional)
What is hearsay?
Hearsay = (i) an out of ct stmt of a person (oral or written); (ii) offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted (in the stmt) RULE: Hearsay stmts are INADMISSABLE UNLESS an exception or exclusion applies Rationale: The credibility of the declarant (out-of-ct speaker or author) at the time the stmt was made WAS NOT TESTED thru cross examination in the presence of the CURRENT factfinder
What is the “stmt against interest” exception to hearsay?
Declarant’s stmt is ADMISSABLE for its truth IF… 1) Declarant is unavailable 2) It is against his/her: Pecuniary interest (i.e. self-damaging stmt abt fin. situation); Property interest (i.e. something that diminishes property interest); OR Penal interest (self-damaging stmt abt penal interest) 3) Must be against interest when made 4) Can be made by ANY declarant (not just party) NOTE: In criminal cases statements by declarant against his penal interest and which are exculpatory for Δ, must be corroborated
What is the 6th Am effect on admissablity of hearsay evidence in a criminal case? NOTE: NY Distinction
RULE: In the context of hearsay, the prosecution may NOT use a hearsay stmt against the criminal ∆ (even if falls w/in a hearsay exception) IF: the stmt is TESTIMONAL; “Testimonial” = (i) grand jury testimony; (ii) stmts in response to police interrogation IF purpose of the questiioning is to est/prove past events that are potentially relevant to criminal prosecution; (iii) sworn affidavits; (iv) forensic lab reports used to target individual NOT “testimonial” = (i) police questioning enabling police assistance in meeting ongoing emergency; (ii) business records; (iii) general DNA profiling w/o ind. suspect in mind the declarant is UNAVAILABLE; AND the ∆ has no opportunity for CROSS EXAMINATION (either before or at trial) “Forfeiture exception”: Any type of hearsay stmt IS ADMISSIBLE against a ∆ whose WRONGDOING made the witness unavailable, IF the ct finds (i) by a preponderance of the evidence; (ii) that ∆’s conduct was SPECIFICALLY designed to prevent the witness from testifying NY DISTINCTION: In NY the std of judicial review is higher…Clear and Convincing Evidence