Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

What is the legal burden of evidence?

A

Prosecution will bear legal under of providing Ds guilt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the standard of proof the prosecution must satisfy

A

Beyond reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When will the legal burden of proof fall on the defendant?

A

Who pleads not guilty and raises defence of insanity or duress. Must prove those facts. Balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who has the legal burden of proof for specific defences?

A

Defendant who raises it, does nOT have the burden. They have evietual burden, and the the prosection has the legal burden of DISPROVING it beyond reasonable doubt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is s 78 of PACE?

A

Discretion to exclude evidence on whcih the prosecution seeks to rely, if the admission of such evidence would have such an adverse effect on teh fairness of proceedings that the court ought not to admit it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are examples of police breaching codes of conduct rules?

A

Video procedure, breaching codes, if detailed and failed to do something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the Turnbull guidelines?

A

Special guidelines apply when witness who gives evidence for CPS visually identifies D as person who committed crime, an D DISPUTES that identification.

A witness will identify D as person if;
- witness picks out D informally, or,
- witness identifies D at formal procedure, or,
- witness claims to recognise D as someone previously known to them

Called Turnbull witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What must the court do to Turnbull witnesse?

A

Asses factors, take into account factors. Judge will gie Turnbull warning to jury, and tell jury it is easy for an honest witness to be mistaken, or point out weaknesses in the idenficiation evidence, and tell jury to look for supporting evidence before conducting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the factors for Turnbull witnesse?

A

Length of observation
Distance
Conditions
Lighting
How much of their fact di they see
If identified as someone already known
How closely the original description matches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If identification is good qualify, what will the judge tell the jury>

A

That even an honest witness can be mistaken. Example closely the circumstances of the original sighting adn taken into account these.

Turnbull warning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What will the judge say to the jury when the identification is POOR, but supported,

A

Turnbull warning, but point out the dangers or relying on evidnece and special need for caution, draw attention to weaknesses one evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What will the judge do if identification is POOR and UNSUPPORTED

A

Judge should stop tal at the end of prosection case and direct jury to acquit defendant.

Follow a submission of no case to answer being made by defendants advocate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the Turnbull guidelines in the magistrates court?

A

Because magistrates decide both fact and law, it is necessary to address.

Must consider quality of evidence. Unlikely to make case of no case to answer, but will address Turnbull guidelines in closing speech and point out that however strong it is, identification evidence is unreliable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 5 inferences from silence?

A

S 34, 35, 36, 37, and 38

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an adverse inference?

A

Court is likely to draw a negative conclusion from teh defendant silence when interviewed at the police station.

Only if given the opportunity to take independent legal adice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the inference under s 34?

A

Allows court or jury o draw A I from D silence when D was being questioned or charged at police station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are pre-conditions for drawing of an adverse inference?

A

Certain conditions have to be satisfied:
interview had to be iinterview under caution
d had to fail to mention any fact later relied on in defence
Failure to mention this act had to occur before D was charged
Questioning of D at interview had to be directed or trying to discover offence
The fact which the D failed to mention had to be a fact which they msut have been expected to mention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Can an adverse inference be used if there is a prepared written statement

A

No, s 34 was to encourage D to make early disclosure of defence to police, therefore this written statement shows this, and cannot draw adverse inference under s 34.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is legal privilege and can it be adversely inferred with>

A

Conversation between suspect and solicitor, protected. Therefore D may give evidence which has the effect of waiting such providing, and allowing prosecution to cross examine them about the reasons for legal advice they were given.

To prevent adverse inference, D gives evidence that they remained silent on advice from solicitor, will NOT waive privilege.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is adverse inferences under s 36?

A

Allows court or jury to draw adverse inference if, when interviewed by police, D failed to account for presence of OBJECT, SUBSTANCE or MARK.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are limitations to s 36 and 37 inference?

A

The police officer that request s information on explanation, must have told the suspect of the SPECIFIED MATTERS before requesting the explanation - the special caution.

What the offence under investigation is
What fact the suspect is being account for
That the officer believes this is important
That a court may draw an adverse inference from failure to comply with the request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is adverse inference under s 37?

A

Allows court to draw adverse inference if, when questioned, the D failed to account for their PRESENCE AT A PARTICULAR PLACE at or about the time the offence was committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are adverse inferences under s 35?

A

A defendant hwo fails tog ive evidence on his own behalf at trial, may be subject to adviser inference being drawn by cour or jury.
If prosection has raised issues which calls for explanation, should the d then FAIL to give evidence, court wll be entitled to infer that they are hiding something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What must the court take into account in s 35 adverse inference?

A

The burden of proof remains on prosecution
The D is entitled to remain silent
Before drawing, the curt had to be satisfied that there was a case to answer on prosection evidence
An adverse inference form D failure to give evidence cannot on its own prove guilt
No adverse inference could be drawn unless only sensible explanation was that he had no good answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is a hearsay statement?

A

A statement, not made in oral evidence, that is relied on as evidence of a matter in it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is an evidence statement?

A

Any representation or fact or opinion made by a person by whatever means,and it includes a representation made in a sketch, photo or other picture form.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What are examples of hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings?

A

Witness repeating at trial what they have been told by another person
A statement from a witness being read out at trial, instead of orally
A police officer repeating at trial a confession made to them by D
A business document being introduced in evidence at trial.

28
Q

What is the difference between first hand and multiple hearsay?

A

First hand hearsay is when the witness repeats a statement that they heard being made.

Multiple hearsay is when the witness is repeating something that has gone through multiple people before she heard it.

29
Q

What are the grounds for admitting hearsay evidence?

A

If it falls into 1 of 4 categories in s 114:
(1)
(A) Any provision or statutory provision makes it admission
(B) Any rule of law preserved by section 118 makes it admissible
(C) All parties to proceedings agree it to be admissible
(D) The court is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice.

30
Q

What are the grounds which makes hearsay evidence admissible under s 114(1)(a)?

A

Cases where witness is unavailable (dead, unfit, outside UK, al reasonable steps have been taken to find them, fear from person) ONLY for first-hand

Business and other document (must have been created or recieved in the course of trade, business), personal knowledge of the matters

Previous inconsistent statements of a witness

Previous consist statements by a witness

Statements for a witness which are not in dispute

Formal admissions

31
Q

What are the grounds which makes hearsay evidence admissible under s 114(1)(b)?

A

Hearsay admission under preserved common law exception:

Evidence of confession or mixed statement made by defendant, or
Evidence admitted as part of res gestae

32
Q

When can confession evidence be used as hearsay evidence?

A

Admissible at common law as an exception to the rule.
Confession made by accused person may be given in evidence agaisnt him, if relevant to any matter, and is not excluded by court.

Therefore admissible, even if hearsay evidence.

33
Q

What is res gestae?

A

Common law rule admitting evidence.

Statement made contemporaneously with an event, will be admissible as an exception to hearsay rule, because the spontaneity of the statement means that any possibility of concoction is disregarded.

34
Q

What are the grounds which makes hearsay evidence admissible under s 114(1)(d)?

A

Hearsay admissible in interest of justice:
Catch-all provision, allowing corut to admit hearsay that would not otherwise be admissible.

35
Q

What are the factors when deciding whether to admit hearsay evidence under s 114(1)(d):?

A

How much probation value the statement has
What other evidence there has been
How important the matter or evidence can be
How important the matter or evidence mentioned is as a whole
Circumstnaces statement was made
How reliable maker of statement is
How reliable evidence is
Or oral evidence can be given, and if not, why
Amount of difficulty involved in challenging the statement

36
Q

What is the procedure for admitting hearsay evidence?

A

Part 20 CrmPR.

Interest of justice for hearsay evidence to be admissible
Witness is unable to attend curt
Evidence is multiple hearsay
Either prosecution or defence rely on s 117 for admission of written witness statement prepared for use

37
Q

What is confession evidence?

A

Any statement wholly or partly adverse to the person who made it, whether made to a person in authority or not, and whether made in words or otherwise.

Anything said by defendant that constitutes an admission of any element of offence, with which they are suequently charged.

38
Q

What is the admissibility of confession evidence?

A

Confession made PRIOR to trial will be admissible in evidence, if relevant to any matter in issue in proceedings.

Therefore exception to hearsay rule

39
Q

What are the rules on mixed statements in a confession?

A

A confession may be included in a statement which is favourable to the D. Whole statement will be admissible under s 76, an an exception to hearsay evidence.

40
Q

Is a confession made by a D admissible in evidence against co-defendant?

A

Any evidence given by co-defendant which implicates a defendant, will be admissible in evidence against defendant.

If co defednatn has pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing and is giving evidence, any evidence can be used as evidence against defendant.

41
Q

Can you challenge the admissibility of a confession by s 76 PACE?

A

May challenge it by arguing they did not make it at all, and either mistaken or fabricated evidence, or, they DID make confession, but it should NOT be admitted one vidence.

If by oppression, or in consequence of anything said or done,w chin renders it unreliable therefore court cannot allow it as evidence.

42
Q

When will oppression render a confession inadmissible?

A

Torture, inhumane or degrading treatment, use of threat of violence. Exercise of authority or power in a harsh manner.

Therefore, if police bully into confession, they can take out confession

43
Q

When will unreliability render a confession inadmissible?

A

Something must be said or done which would render it unreliable- usually conduct of police, rbeach of Code C of Code of Pracitce

Denying refreshments
Offering inducement to confess
Misrepresenting strength of prosecution case
Questioning in inappropriate way
Questioning someone not in a fit state
Threatening.

Deny access to legal advice is NOT unreliable confession.

44
Q

Can a co-defendant rely on a confession made by another defendant?

A

Allows D to adduce evidence that a co-defendnat has made a confession, where both D pleads not guilty and they are tried jointly.

However, if co defendant represents that confession was a result of oppression, court must exclude this.

45
Q

Can you challenge admissibility of s 78 PACE- prosecution evidence?

A

Yes, discretion to exclude confession evidence on which CPS seeks to reply, if the court considers it would have an adviser effect of the fairness of proceedings, and that it ought not to be admitted.

46
Q

In what circumstances can s 78 PACE be challenged?

A

If D alleges that police breached provision of PACE to get confession (must be significant and substantial breaches)
If D denies making a confession, as it was made outside police station - can be challenged under s 78.

47
Q

What is the procedure for challenging the admissibility of confession evidence int eh crown court?

A

Admissibility of disputed confession evidence will be determined by trial judge in absence of the jury, voir dire.

Jury will hear nothing of it, if judge rules confession to be inadmissible

48
Q

What is the procedure for challenging the admissibility of confession evidence int eh magistrates court?

A

If s 76Voir dire as well, however if D raises s 78 , no obligation to hold one.

49
Q

What is character evidence

A

Admissibility of bad character evidence, from Criminal Justice Act 2003

50
Q

What is the definition of bad character evidence?

A

evidence of or at a disposition towards, misconduct.

Misconduct is the commission of an offence or other bad behaviour.

51
Q

What are the 7 gateways s 101 to bad character evidence?

A

Al parties to proceedings agree to evidence being admissible

Evidence is adduced by D himself or is given in answer to a question in cross examination

Important explanatory evidence

Relevant to an important matter between D and prosecution

Substantial probate expenses value

Evidence to correct a false impression given by defendant

Defendant has made an attack on another persons character

52
Q

Examples of evidence being adduced by defendant himself of his bad character

A

If do not want jury to think that they have past convictions.
If plead guilty on previous occasions, but are pleading not guilt to the current matter.

53
Q

Examples of explanatory evidence for character evidence

A

Evidence is important if without it, magistrates or jury would find it impossible or difficult to property understand aes, and,

Value of evidence for understanding the case as a whole is substantial.

54
Q

What is propensity to commit an. Offence of the kind charged?

A

CPS may place evidence that a D has previous conviction in order to suggest they have the PROPENSITY to commit offences of the same kind.

Offence of hte same description as the one charged (same description, if written charge will be in same terms)

Offence of the same category of teh one charged (if they are in teh same category (sexual offences, theft category)

55
Q

Can other offences be used eto show propensity in someone’s character?

A

If they are of the same description or category, yes.

If they are not, but the have significant factual similarities, then yes.

Fewer they have, less likely that propensity will be established.

56
Q

How can you prove propensity to be untruthful in character evidence?

A

Show that the D has a propensity o be untruthful, therefore lacks credibility.

If false representation - must be misleading

If D pleaded not guilty to earlier defence, but was convicted. To ANY offence

57
Q

Can you exclude evidence under gateway (d) on character evidence through propensity of untruthfulness

A

Yes, if it appears to court to haev such an adviser effect on fairness of the proceedings that the court ought not to admit it.

58
Q

What is the cut throat defence of character evidence?

A

Gateway (e), where there are 2 or more D jointly charge, and each D pleads not guilty and blames eachother.

If co defendant can esbtaush the tes for admitting evidence of the D bad character court has no power to prevent admission of this evidence.

59
Q

Examples of gateway (f) fo character evidence

A

Defendant will be treated of making assertion if assertion is :

Made by defendant in proceedings
Made by D when being questioned
Made by witness called by D
Made by any witness in cross-examination
Made by any person out of course, and D adduces evidence

60
Q

Which gateways do the court have power eto exclude bad character evidence?

A

D and g ONLY

61
Q

What is the proceeding for admitting evidence of bad character?

A

If CPS want to adduce evidence, notice of this must be given to court and other parties of the case.

Prescribed form must be used.

Court will imposed time limits for parties to serve ay notices.

62
Q

Are bad character of persons OTHER than the defendant admissible?

A

Yes, on very limited grounds. It must have important exapanatory evidence, which without it, court would find impossible to properly understand evidence, and substantial probative value int elation to the important matter int he proceedings.

63
Q

When is leave of the court required?

A

Under s 10, wll be required if a party wishes to adduce evidence of the bad character of a person other than the D.

64
Q

When can the court use the wer in s 78 to exclude evidence?

A

If there is something unreliable about evidence whcih teh police have obtained, which means it si unfair to allow the CPS to rely on it.

Breaches must be significant and substantial breaches of PACE for it to reject it.

65
Q

Evidence obtained by entrapment

A

No defence known as entrapment. It is possible to challenge the admissibility of which evidence under s 78.

66
Q

What are the 6 grounds for hearsay evidence to be admissible

A

114 (1) (a) : statutory provisions
(B) s 118 confession
(C) all parties agree
(D) in the interests of justice

116: unavailable to attend
117: business documents