Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Re Kneebone

What is the relevant section of the Evidence Act?

A

s38 - unfavourable witness

mother present at time of rape by stepfather; prosecution failed to call mother as witness

full width of s38 yet to be determined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Stanoevski v Queen

A

s192 EA

where ever leave is required, s192 engaged; quote Stanoevski

“in all cases the court must take into account matters prescribed by s192(2) as well as matters which may be relevant to particular case”

s192 not exhaustive list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Smith v The Queen

A

s55 EA
Relevance - given broad interpretation
evidence is either relevant or its not
no discretion exercised in determining relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

s55 Relevance

A

Smith v The Queen
IMM v The Queen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Honeysett v the Queen

A

s.79(1) opinion evidence; specialised knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

IMM v The Queen

A

Probative value
evidence should be presumed to be admitted and taken at its highest to determine the probative value of evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Esso Australian Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

A

High Court accepts the ‘dominant purpose’ test for legal professional privilege for the common law (in line with test in s.118 EA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mann v Carnell

A

Common law test of privilege - loss of privilege by waiver of privilege - inconsistency between conduct of client and maintenance of confidentiality

s.122 changed to reflect CL test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dasreef v Hawach

A

Expert opinion - exception to opinion rule - s.79

2 criteria under s79:
1. Witness has specialised knowledge based on person’s training, education or experience; AND
2. Opinion is whollym or substantially based on that knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dyers v R

A

Cult case

General rule - trial judge should not direct jury that they are entitled to infer evidence which accused could have given would not assist accused (Jones v Dunkel inference not available in criminal proceedings)

s.20 Comment on failure to give evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly