Evidence Flashcards
When is evidence relevant?
What is the test for excluding logically relevant evidence under FRE 403?
Should relevant evidence be excluded due to the danger of unfair prejudice if the evidence would cause unfair surprise to a party or witness?
For what reasons may a court exclude logically relevant evidence under FRE 403
To what extent can an evidentiary hearing be conducted in the presence of a jury?
Can evidence of liability insurance be used to prove that D owned a vehicle in question?
When is evidence of subsequent remedial measures admissible? For what reason would it be inadmissible?
To what extent are settlements or offers to settle admissible in civil cases?
If introduced to prove guilt, are statements D made during plea negotiations admissible in a criminal case?
For what purpose would evidence of an offer to pay medical expenses by inadmissible?
For what reasons could evidence of prior similar occurrences be deemed admissible?
What type of prior conduct may be admissible as evidence of habit?
For what purpose is character evidence generally inadmissible?
When can character evidence be admissible?
If D in a criminal trial introduces evidence of her good character, what are the potential consequences?
If D in a criminal trial calls a W to testify to D’s good character, can W offer opinion evidence?
If D introduces evidence of his good character in a criminal trial, how can the prosecution rebut?
In what instances can the prosecution initiate introduction of evidence of D’s character?
Can the prosecution initiate the introduction of evidence of the victim’s character to prove conduct?
What determines whether D, in a civil sexual assault case, may introduce evidence of the victim’s character?
When may D introduce reputation or opinion evidence of the victim in a criminal sexual assault case?
In what situations may D introduce specific instances evidence of victim’s sexual behavior in a criminal sexual assault case?
If D wants to introduce any evidence of a victim’s character in a sexual assault case, what procedure is required?
Are specific instances of D’s prior bad acts/conduct admissible? If so, for what purpose?
What are common ways that evidence of D’s prior acts can be admissible?
What is impeachment evidence?
In what ways may a witness be impeached (i.e., what are the different methods of impeachment)?
May evidence supporting a witness’s credibility be introduced if the witness has not been impeached?
What is extrinsic evidence? In what way is it prohibited for impeachment purposes?
When would an issue be considered a collateral matter for impeachment purposes? How do you determine if an issue is collateral?
When would extrinsic evidence of a fact that contradicts a witness’s testimony be admissible?
What type of evidence may be used to show that a W has made contradictory statements on material issues?
How can a prior inconsistent statement be used for impeachment purposes?
If a prior inconsistent statement constitutes hearsay, is it admissible?
To what extent may a witness be impeached by prior instances of misconduct?
What requirement must be met to impeach a witness by establishing bias?
Can a witness be impeached based on their reputation for truthfulness?
If a witness has a recent misdemeanor conviction for assault, can the prior conviction be used for impeachment? What about if the witness is the D?
If a witness who is not the D was convicted for fraud six years ago, can the prior conviction be used for impeachment?
If a D-witness has a felony conviction for battery from last year, can the prior conviction be used for impeachment? What about if the witness is not the D?
When can a prior conviction more than ten years old be used for impeachment purposes?
What requirement must be met for any testifying witness?
To be deemed competent, what qualifications must a witness have?
If a witness cannot recall exact specifics of an event, but has basic memory of the event, will the witness be deemed competent to testify?
In what situations may a witness be excluded from hearing other witnesses’ testimony?
Can a party who is a witness be excluded from hearing other witnesses’ testimony?
If a document is used to refresh a witness’s memory during testimony, what rules apply?
If a document is used to refresh a witness’s memory during testimony, can the witness read from the document?
What requirements must be satisfied for a recorded recollection to be read into evidence?
Can the contents of a document a witness has never seen or heard be read into evidence as a recorded recollection?
If a document is used to refresh a witness’s memory during her testimony (i.e., present recollection refreshed), is the document read into evidence?
If a recorded recollection contains hearsay, is it admissible?
What is a leading question and when is it acceptable? When is it improper?
In what circumstances would an objection to a question as beyond the scope of direct be proper?
Can an objection to the form of a question asked on Day 1 of a trial be made on Day 2?