Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

BAR > Evidence > Flashcards

Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

RELEVANCE

A

DEF: It has any tendency to make a fact of consequence to the outcome of the matter more or less probably. MUST BE
1) Material (of consequence)
2) Probative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

EXCLUDING RELEVANT EVIDENCE

A

May be excluded if the probative value is substantial outweighed by 1 or more of the following:
1) Misleading the jury
2) Danger of unfair prejudice
2) Confusion of issues
3) undue delay
4) cumulative
6) Waste of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PRIOR FALSE CLAIMS - SAME BODILY INJURY

A

Generally Inadmissible

ADMISSIBLE for
1) show previous similar false claims
2) causation of injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

HABIT EVIDENCE

A

DEF: Regular response to a specific set of circumstances

ADMIT as CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence of conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

LIABILITY INSURANCE

A

INADMISSIBLE FOR:
1) negligence

ADMIT FOR:
1) ownership or control
2) Impeach
3) part of admission of liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL MEASURES

A

INADMISSIBLE FOR:
1) negligence, culpable conduct, defect, need for warning

ADMIT FOR:
1) ownership, control
2) rebut claim that remedy was not feasible
3) prove opposing party DESTROYED evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CIVIL SETTLEMENTS/NEGOTIATIONS

A

INADMISSIBLE for:
1) proving/disprove amount
2) impeachment by prior inconsistent statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CIVIL DISPUTE WITH GOVERNMENT

A

ADMIT when offered in criminal case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

PAYMENTS/OFFERS TO PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES

A

INADMISSIBLE FOR:
1) Liability

ADMIT - admissions of fact accompanying statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

CHARACTER EVIDENCE

A

DEF: A person’s general propensity or disposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE

A

1) Character trait directly IN ISSUE
2) Circumstantial evidence of how they PROBABLY ACTED
3) Impeachment by bad character for truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

METHODS OF PROVING CHARACTER

A

1) Specific Acts
2) Opinion T
3) Reputation T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DEFENSE: CHARACTER EVIDENCE

A

Character W for defense may testify to D’s good REPUTATION for a PERTINENT trait and may give personal OPINION re: that trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

PROSECUTION: CHARACTER EVIDENCE

A

1) DEF must OPEN DOOR
2) Then P can cross D’s W re specific acts (did you know?) - show lack of knowledge
3) P can call OWN CHARACTER W’S FOR R/O

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

VICTIM’S CHARACTER - CRIM CASES

A

When: Usually in self defense cases re: V as first aggressor

HOW: R/O testimony of bad character for relevant trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

VICTIM’S CHARACTER - PROSECUTION REBUTTAL

A

When: Self defense cases re: V as first aggressor
How:
1) After D opens door
2) R/O evidence of D’s bad character for same trait OR
3) R/O evidence of V’s good character for same trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

CIVIL CASES: CHARACTER

A

Generally Inadmissible

Admit when: Directly in issue

Cases:
1) Defamation
2) Negligent hiring/entrustment
3) child custody cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

OTHER MISCONDUCT: NON-CHARACTER PURPOSES

A

MIMIC
1) Motive
2) Intent
3) Mistake (lack of)
4) Identity
5) common plan or scheme

Admissibility: sufficient evidence to support jury finding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

AUTHENTICATION OF EVIDENCE

A

BE AWARE OF
1) authentication
2) Best evidence rule
3) hearsay

Proof - must be SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A JURY FINDING OF GENUINENESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

METHODS OF AUTH

A

1) opponent admission
2) Eyewitness T
3) Handwriting verification (layperson w/knowledge OR expert)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

ADMISSIBILITY: PHOTOS AND VIDEOS

A

1) Identified by a W and
2) verified by W as FAIR AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION of facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

AUTHENTICATION: ORAL STATEMENTS

A

Voice ID: testified to by opinion of anyone who heard the voice at ANY TIME

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

BEST EVIDENCE RULE (ORIGINAL DOC RULE)

A

This means that original documents are favored over copies.

Used to prove content of writing, recording or photo

ORIGINAL must be produced if terms are MATERIAL

SATISFACTORY EXCUSE needed for producing secondary evidence

BAR TIP: USUALLY WRONG ANSWER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

BEST EVIDENCE RULE: APPLICATION

A

1) Writing is a LEGALLY OPERATIVE OR DISPOSITIVE INSTRUMENT or
2) KNOWLEDGE of W results from having read it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES
PRESUMPTION that W's are competent
26
CHILDREN AS W'S
Case by case determination of judge
27
INSANE W's
Can testify if they: 1) understand obligations to speak truthfully 2) Have capacity to testify ACCURATELY
28
JURORS AS W'S
MAY TESTIFY TO: 1)if extraneous prejudicial information was given to jury 2) if OUTSIDE INFLUENCE bore on jury 3) MISTAKE on verdict form 4) clear statements of juror about RACE or ANIMUS to convict
29
DEAD MAN STATUTES
CIVIL CASES - interest person is: 1) incompetent to testify to communication with deceased 2) When offered against representatives or successors in interest
30
PRESENT RECOLLECTION REVIVED
W's can use writings or objects to refresh present recollection. NOT in evidence
31
PRR: ADVERSE PARTY OPTIONS
When W uses writing to refresh memory ON STAND, opp party can: 1) have writing produced at trial 2) Cross examine about writing AND 3) introduce related portions of the writing
32
PAST RECOLLECTION RECORDED
W has insufficient memory, the record can be READ INTO EVIDENCE if PROPER FOUNDATION LAID with proof that: 1) W has insufficient memory, 2) W had PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE of the facts in the record 3) Record made by W or adopted AND 4) W vouches for accuracy
33
PAST RR ADMISSION IN EVIDENCE
Can only be admitted IN EVIDENCE if offered by the ADVERSE PARTY
34
LAY WITNESS OPINION TESTIMONY
Admissible when: 1) rationally based on W's perceptions 2) HELPFUL to clear understanding of W's T AND 3) not based on specialized knowledge
35
EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY REQ'S
1) Specialized knowledge req'd 2) based on sufficient facts or data 3) reliable principles/methods AND 4) reliable application of those principles to facts
36
IMPEACHMENT
Offered to discredit a Witness NOT as SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE when only for impeachment purposes
37
IMPEACHMENT METHODS
1) Cross examination 2) Extrinsic evidence
38
IMPEACHMENT BY PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT
Can cross-examine OR use EXTRINSIC evidence PROPER FOUNDATION for EE needed
39
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS: SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE
Admissible as such if the prior statement was made UNDER OATH at a PRIOR proceeding = non-hearsay
40
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT: EE FOUNDATION
1) Witness is given OPPORTUNITY to explain or deny the statement AND 2) ADVERSE party had opportunity to EXAMINE them DOESN'T APPLY - Opposing party statements
41
BIAS EVIDENCE
Can show that a witness has a motive to lie
42
BIAS: EE FOUNDATION
Unclear Majority Rule: W must first be asked about facts showing bias or interest on cross exam
43
OPINION/REPUTATION - UNTRUTHFULNESS
You can call a character W to testify about another W's bad reputation/bad opinion for the truth
44
IMPEACHMENT: CRIMES
1) ANY crime involving DISHONESTY or FALSE STATEMENT 2) Felony - balancing test 3) NONE - over 10 years old
45
IMPEACHMENT: BAD ACTS FOR UNTRUTHFULNESS
At judge's discretion - W can be cross examined on misconduct for untruthfulness BUT NOT EE
46
IMPEACHMENT: HEARSAY DECLARANT
Credibility of a hearsay declarant can be attached by evidence that would be admitted if the declarant HAD TESTIFIED at trial. Any impeachment methods OK NO OPPORTUNITY needed for declarant to explain
47
REHAB AFTER IMPEACHMENT
1) Explanation on re-direct 2) Good character for truth - R/O by other W's 3) Prior consistent statement
48
HEARSAY
Def: An out of court statement offered to PROVE THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER ASSERTED
49
DOUBLE HEARSAY
Hearsay incorporating other hearsay Ex. After the accident, JOHN TOLD ME THAT MARY SAID...
50
ADMISSIBLE FOR NON-TRUTH PURPOSES
1) Verbal acts or legally operative facts 2) Statements offered to show EFFECT ON LISTENER
51
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: PRIOR ID
1) W is available 2) statement is one of prior ID 3) that the W perceived at an earlier time
52
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT
1) W is available 2) prior statement is inconsistent with current T 3) AND was made UNDER OATH 4) at a DIFFERENT PROCEEDING
53
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: PRIOR CONSISTENT STATEMENT
Consistent if: 1) offered to rebut charge of lying/exaggerating 2) offered to REHAB the W when impeached on SOME OTHER GROUNDS
54
OPPOSING PARTY STATEMENTS
DEF: Statements made by or attributable to a party and OFFERED AGAINST THEM - NOT HEARSAY
55
ADOPTION BY SILENCE
1) Party is accused 2) party heard & understood the statement 3) Capable of denying it 4) A REASONABLE person would have DENIED it
56
VICARIOUS STATEMENTS: AUTHORIZED SPOKESPERSON
statements made by an authorized spokesperson can be admitted against the party to a case.
57
VICARIOUS STATEMENTS: AGENTS & EMPLOYEES
ADMISSIBLE if it: 1) concerned matter WITHIN THE SCOPE of agency/employment AND 2) made DURING THE EXISTENCE of the relationship DOESN'T have to happen WHILE ON THE JOB
58
WHEN IS A DECLARANT UNAVAILABLE
1) death, physical, mental illness 2) Exempt - privilege 3) Refusal to testify 4) Don't remember subject matter 5) ABSENT and unable to be procured
59
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: FORMER TESTIMONY
1) Declarant is unavailable 2) Testimony given UNDER OATH 3) Party against whom testimony is offered had OPPORTUNITY and SIMILAR MOTIVE to exam W
60
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: STATEMENT AGAINST INTEREST
1) Declarant is unavailable 2) Against pecuniary, proprietary or penal interest WHEN MADE
61
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: DYING DECLARATION
1) Homicide and ALL civil cases 2) Declarant believed their death was imminent AND 3) statement about CAUSE or CIRCUMSTANCES of believed impending death
62
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: EXCITED UTTERANCE
1) Declarant availability immaterial 2) relating to startling event 3) made while UNDER STRESS of excitement
63
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: PRESENT STATE OF MIND
Statements of declarant's then-existing state of mind are admissible: 1) motive, intent, plan 2) sensory conditions, 3) physical conditions 4) emotion conditions
64
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: STATEMENTS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT
Admissible for: 1) med history, 2) past or present symptoms 3) GENERAL CAUSE of injury
65
HEARSAY EXCEPTION: REGULAR BUSINESS RECORDS
Writings made as a memo of an act, event, condition, opinion or diagnosis ELEMENTS: 1) Business 2) Made in regular course of buz 3) regular keeping of such records 4) made at or near time of event 5) entrant is personally knowledgeable
66
HEARSAY EXCLUDED: CONFRONTATION CLAUSE
Inadmissible where: 1) statement offered against accused criminal 2) Declarant UNAVAILABLE 3) statement was "testimonial" (sworn + to law enforcement) 4) Accused could NOT CROSS EXAMINE
67
PRIVILEGE
1) Fed substantive law cases - apply fed common law 2) Fed diversity cases - state law
68
WHO ASSERTS PRIVILEGE?
Can be asserted ONLY BY THE HOLDER
69
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Applies to: 1) confidential comms 2) between attorney-client 3) during professional consultation 4) Unless WAIVED HOLDER: CLIENT
70
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE: EXCEPTION
No privilege when: 1) services sought to aid in PLANNING OR COMMISSION of a CRIME or FRAUD 2) where LEGAL SERVICES are at ISSUE
71
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT PRIVILEGE (ONLY STATES)
1) Professional relationship existed 2) info for purpose of diagnosis/treatment 3) necessary for such purpose
72
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT PRIVILEGE
1) Physical condition IN ISSUE (PI cases) 2) patient sought aid in wrongdoing 3) dispute btw parties 4) patient AGREED to WAIVE 5) fed cases on fed law
73
SPOUSAL IMMUNITY (CRIM CASES)
When invoked - spouse of crim defendant cannot be called 1) must be a valid marriage AT THE TIME OF TRIAL 2) lasts ONLY DURING MARRIAGE HOLDER: Witness spouse
74
CONFIDENTIAL MARRIAGE COMMS: PRIVILEGE
Applies: civil or criminal cases Either spouse can refuse disclosure MARITAL RELATIONSHIP EXISTED WHEN THE COMMUNICATION IS MADE
75
BURDEN OF PRODUCTION
Party of pleading has burden to make PRIMA FACIE CASE
76
BURDEN OF PROOF
Civil cases: generally PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE Crim: BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
77
PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS FOR JURY
1) Relevance of evidence - BUT judge determines if there is SUFFICIENT PROOF TO SUPPORT JURY FINDING that the fact exists
78
PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS: JUDGE
1) Witness competence 2) Privilege 3) Exceptions to hearsay apply
79
JUDICIAL NOTICE (DEFINITION)
Recognizing that a fact is true without formally presenting evidence
80
JUDICIAL NOTICE (WHICH FACTS?)
1) Generally known 2) Accurately and readily determined

BAR (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions