everything need to know Flashcards
strength of evolutionery explanations
strength-research support for inter sexual selection
-clark and hatfield
-found that females are moe selective when it comes to potential partners
-used male and female psychlogy students to go round uni campus asking 1 of 3 quesions
-would you go on a date with me 50 50
-would you g back to my aprtment 69 6
-woudl you have sex with me 75 0
-shows men want to impregante as many women as possible. Due to high sperm production and low energy required
also shows men are not as choosy as women. shows diffrence in mating strategies. supports due to women limited amount of egg cells produced in intervals
-howver, criticised for narrow sample (undergraduate studies) doesn’t represent all types of relatiosnshps
we dont know if non undergraduate students would be less selective
strngth of evolutionery explanations
strength-supporting research for partner prefernces to anigosmoy(diffrences in sex cells) (gametes)
-buss conducted survey of over 10,000 adults
-33 countries
-asked questions about age
-variety of attributes thar evoultiery theory predicts is important in partner preference
-female mating prefernces-females placed greater value on resource-related charactristics e.g ambition
-male mating preferneces-placed more importance on good looks and preffreed younger mates more than females
-strength as 10,000 very large sample size
-findings reflect sex differences due to anigosmy
-findings can be applied hugely across different cultures
equity theory
suggests partners are concerned about fairness of a relationship
-fairness cheived if they get what they deserve from relationship
rewards and costs do not matter, uts the ratio of the two to eachother which matters
role of equity
what matters is that both partners level of profit(rewards-costs) are roughly the same
when there is lack of equity, one parter over benefits and the other under benefits
-recipe for disatifcation and unhappiness
equity and equality
according to equity theoery, its not about size of rewards or costs its about ratio of the two to eachother
one partner puts lot in realtiosnhip and gets a lot back, fair enough
rewards are disrupted fairly not necesarily equal between partners
strength of equity theory
absorption addiction model
absortpion
addiction
absorption
-seeking fulfilment in celbeirty worship
-motivates individual to focus attention as far as possible, on celebrity
-pre-occupided in there existance and identifywith them
addiction
like a psychoactive drug
individual needs to sustain commitemnt in realtiosnhip
feeling strong and closer involvement
may lead to extreme behaviour
e.g stalking but stoped by manager
social penetration theory
-gradul process of reavling more info about inner selg
-reciricoal exchange of info
-partner reveals perosnal info signals i trust you
-other partner reveals senstve infon
more disclosued, more penetration deeper into eachothers lives
onion analogy
-realtiosnhip progresses, onion layer removed
-represents meaningful info
-occurs only if recipricaol
-makes strong realtosnhip with trust
breadth and depth of self discolsure
both increase, more commitemernt
-at start, superficial info low risk
-breadth of discolsue narror as most topics off limit
-if spoke about classed as TMI
Too much info threatning realtiosnhip
eventially disclosure more high risk info e.g past experiences
filter theory
criteria of 3 social demography, similarity in attitudes and complamentairy
social demography
wind range of factors which may influence two people meeting eachother
-geographical loaction (proximity)
-social class
-level of education
-religion
-ethnic gorup
simialrity in attitudes
ides we go for those of simialr values #discount those who differ in values from us