everything Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

jurisdiction section

A

sec 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

jurisdiction definition

A

courts to try all civil suits unless barred
the courts shall have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature excepting suits of which their cognisance is either expressly or impliedly barred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

wherever there is a right there is a remedy

A

ubi jus ibi remedium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

which case defined jurisdiction as judicial power to hear and determine the cause and adjudicate upon it

A

Hriday nath roy v Akhil chandra roy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

court will have jurisdiction over a matter only if it has the authority to try the same and as well as pass orders with respect to the same

A

Official trustee v Sachindra

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

if two or more courts have jurisdiction on the same thing then

A

the parties may choose which court to go to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

lack of jurisdiction

A

the court inherently does not have the power to decide a case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

irregular exercise to jurisdiction

A

court wrongly decides a case, there can be an appeal to such cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

there is virtually no difference between irregular exercise and and lack of jurisdiction anymore

A

Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Basis for deciding jurisdiction

A

1- the case put forward by the plaintiff in the plaint
2- if court has jurisdiction of primary issues and not collateral issue it may prima facie decide the matter but it may be challenged
3- the jurisdiction of any authority of depends on the fulfilment of the jurisdictional pact
4- court or tribunal has the power to determine jurisdiction
5- when parliament by way on statute confers jurisdiction over a court or tribunal it has the right to exercise the same and no writ or certiorari can be issues against them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

types of jurisdiction

A

local/territorial
pecuniary
subject matter
original/appellate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

res sub judice

A

sec 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

res sub judice explain

A

no court shall proceed with the trial of any suit , which is previously instituted in which
1- matter is the same
2- parties are the same
3- titles is the same
4- pending in some other competent court
5- which has the jurisdiction
but if its a foreign case it can be heard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

res sub judice literal meaning

A

under judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

essential of res sub judice

A

existence of 2 or more suits- one previously instituted and one subsequently
previously instituted suit is still pending in the same court
the suit the following are the same
-matter
-parties
-title
subsequent court here can be
-same court where the matter was instituted
-any other court in India
-any court outside India established by the central government
supreme court
previous suit court should be competent and have jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the object of this res subjdice is to protect a person from multiplicity of proceedings and to avoid a conflict of decisions. Also protects the parties from unnecessary harassment

A

SPA Annamalay Chetty v BA Thornhill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

res sub judice cannot be applied when the point of issues are distinct and different

A

Alimallah v Sheik

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

res sub judice cannot be applied when some issues are in common but the rest are different

A

Abdur v Asrafun

18
Q

res sub judice cannot be applied if parties are same bu issues are different

A

Manzar v Rema

19
Q

why res sub judice

A

save time of the court on the same case
avoid conflicts of decrees
avoid misuse by parties otherwise

20
Q

res judicata section

A

sec 11

21
Q

res judicata

A

a matter that has been previously heard and decided by a court of competent jurisdiction, may not be pursued further by the same parties
matter, title parties should be same

22
Q

why res judicata

A

no man should be vexed twice for the same cause
it is in the interest of the state that there should be an end to litigation
a judicial decision must be accepted as correct

23
Q

ex capito res judicata

A

Roman Law- one suit and one decision is enough for any single dispute

24
Q

res judicata case law

A

satyadhat ghost v deorjin debi

25
Q

res judicata applies to write petitions too (except habeas corpus)

A

Daryo Singh v state of UP

26
Q

Foreign Court

A

sec 2(5)- court situated outside india and not established by the central government

27
Q

foreign judgement

A

2(6)

28
Q

section 13

A

a foreign judgement should be conclusive when it is directly adjudicated between the same parties, for the title.

29
Q

sec 13 exceptions

A

1- incompetent jurisdiction
2- against the merit of the case
3- Incorrect view of international law or not respecting Indian law
4- against natural justice
5- Judgement obtained by fraud
6- Claim is a breach of Indian law

30
Q

if the foreign judgement was not given on the basis of merits, the same cannot be executed in India
it was also submitted that proving a decree was not on merit is entirely on the Appellants

A

M/s International Woollen mills v M/s Standard Wool (UK) Ltd

31
Q

sec 14

A

Presumption of foreign judgement

32
Q

presumption of foreign judgement should be read consistently with the requirements of sec 86 of the Indian Evidence act 1872

A

Y Narsimha Rao v Y Venkata Lakshmi v Anr

33
Q

judgement sec + order

A

sec 2(9) order 20

34
Q

Decree sec + order

A

sec 2(2) order 20

35
Q

Order given in

A

sec 2(14)

36
Q

mesne profits sec

A

section 2(12)

37
Q

parties to a suit which order

A

Order 1

38
Q

joinder of plaintiffs and defendants

A

Rule 1 to 4

39
Q

Representative suit

A

Rule 8

40
Q

Mis-joinder and Non-joinder and objections

A

Rule 9 and 13

41
Q

Striking out and adding parties

A

Rule 10

42
Q

Institution of suit

A

Order 4 + section 26

43
Q
A