Eve Sedgwick 'Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading' Flashcards
hooks argument aligns with Sedgwick’s through the importance placed on
intentionality in theory and modes of reading
Both challenge the idea that
theory or critical reading has inherent transformative power
Instead, they suggest that transformative potential is
fostered through intentional and purposeful engagement
The “reparative reading” model allows Sedgwick to offer an example
of how individuals can change their reading practices in order to achieve a goal that is healing, liberatory and revolutionary
In contrast to paranoia, reparative reading is a more
constructive and empathetic approach to texts that looks for the positive and understands that theory can be beneficial for readers
The same way that hooks argues that this positive potential is not “inherent”
Sedgwick too suggests that to read reparatively must be a conscious choice
as the natural and instinctive
mode of reading is paranoid reading
Characterized by
suspicion, critique and negativity
paranoid reading highlights the
potential harm or lack of inherent positive qualities in theory and literature
paranoid reading is a limiting mode of reading
as it works through presupposing bad intentions to every text
Sedgwick highlights a need to be
intentional and deliberate through our reading practices
in order to acquire
the transformative potential that hooks outlines in her statement
By moving us beyond
what we initially might feel when receiving a text
Sedgwick embraces the
agency of the reader in shaping the impact of their engagement
A conscious decision to reparatively read
is an effective option over paranoia as a reader is able to make something great out of their reading