Evaluation of gender bias in the diagnosis of SZ Flashcards
A03 - Evidence of gender bias?
P - There is evidence of gender bias in diagnosis of SZ.
E - Cotton (2009) research implies women also seem to recover more and suffer loss relapse than males. Ignoring these factors would result in gender bias (beta bias).
E - In clinicions not considering factors in the diagnosis and implications could be determained to the recovery of male patients as they are more likely to relapse. A look of factors and support in their recovery from clinicians can lead to further re-lapse.
L - Shows presence of gender bias.
- Cotton (2009)
- women recover
- gender bias
- beta bias
- male pateints
- re-lapse
- gender bias
A03 - Further supporting evidence
P - Evidence that there are gender issues in the diagnosis of SZ comes from Loring and Powell (1988).
E - They randomly selected 290 males and female psychiatricts to read 2 cases. Then asked to offer their judgment on these indivdiuals using standard diagnostic criteria. When patients described as male or no info was about their gender, 56% gave a diagnostic of SZ. However when the patients were described as females, only 20% diagnosed. And this gender bias was less prominent in female psychiatrics.
E - This research shows how gender bias in diagnosis is common and how their are issues with diagnosing people based on gender (less chance of diagnostic).
- Loring and Powell (1988)
- 290 males and female psychiatrics
- 2 cases
- male or no info - 56%
- female - 20%
A03 - Androcentric findings
P - There is research to suggest that the findings and explanations of SZ is seen as Androcentric.
E - Nasser et al (2002) found that much of the early research into SZ only used male subjects.
E - Thus, a lot of the criteria of the diangosis of SZ is biassed towards men and the content used may be innappropiate for women.
L - This shows how the validity of the diagnosis of SZ levels validity towards women (gender bias) and fails to generalise towards the rest of the target population.
- Androcentric
- Nassaer et al (2002)
- biassed towards men
- fails to generalise