Evaluation Measures

Question 1

McNeill and Stoltenberg, 1992
McNeill, B. W., & Stoltenberg, C. D. (1992). The Integrated Developmental Model of Supervision: Scale Development and Validation Procedures. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(6), 504–508. https://doi-org.unco.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/0735-7028.23.6.504

Answer 1

preliminary support for construct validity of SLQ-R

47 item, on structures self-other awareness, autonomy, motivation

little difference observed between beginning and intermediate, but significant differences to advanced; hypthesize that the sample represented level 1 and 2 only

trainee perspectives should not be minimized, and should be taken into account with other measures (supervisor perspective, and bhx observation)

Question 2

(Lambie et al., 2018)
Lambie, G. W., Mullen, P. R., Swank, J. M., & Blount, A. (2018). The Counseling Competencies Scale: Validation and Refinement. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1358964

Answer 2

further evidence in support of CCS-R

2 factor model - counseling skills and therapeutic conditions is first factor and then counseling dispositions and bhx

additional training using CCS-R scoring for counselor disposition and bhx domains

CE have gatekeeping responsibility and CCS can be helpful tool in that job

useful to compare supervisor and supervisee’s perceptions to facilitate awareness and discussion

dispositions like: emotional stability/self-control; motivation to learn/grow; multicultural competencies; openness to feedback; flexibility/adaptability; congruence and genuineness

skills like: nonverbal skills; encouragers; questions; confrontation; goal setting; empathy and caring; reflection of meaning; reflection of feeling

Question 3

(Swank et al., 2012)

Swank, J. M., Lambie, G. W., & Witta, E. L. (2012). An Exploratory Investigation of the Counseling Competencies Scale: A Measure of Counseling Skills, Dispositions, and Behaviors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 51(3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2012.00014.x

Answer 3

Counseling competency scale
Strong internal consistency. And inter rater reliability
Good initial evidence
Counseling skills disposition and behaviors

Question 4

(Bernard & Goodyear, 2014)

Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (Sixth edition). Pearson.

Answer 4

Measures for evaluation: 
supervisory satisfaction questionnaire
supervisee needs index
supervisee levels questionnaire- revised
anticipatory supervisee anxiety scale
multicultural supervision competencies questionnaire
supervisory working alliance
supervisory styles inventory
counselor supervisor self-efficacy scale

Question 5

(Junga et al., 2019)

Junga, Y. M., Witthöft, M., & Weck, F. (2019). Assessing therapist development: Reliability and validity of the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire (SLQ-R). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(9), 1658–1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22794

Answer 5

supervisee levels questionnaire is valid and reliable measure of supervisee development

3 factor-model was not significant, but 2-factor model of professional self-confidence and professional insecurity was significant

corellations between self-awareness and autonomy were significant

no significant change in tx motivation in developmental process

positive correlation between developmental level and treatment experience, as well as SLQ and supervisory experience

German study