Evaluation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are limitations of repeated measure design

A

The order effect
When participants do the second test they may guess the aims of the experiment which can effect their behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you deal with the limitations of the repeated measure design

A

Counter balancing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are limitations on the independent groups design

A

Cannot control participant variables
Need more participants than repeated measure design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How to deal with limitations of the repeated measure design

A

Random allocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are limitations of matched pairs design

A

Very time consuming
Not possible to count all participants variables as they’re only allocated on one aspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How to deal with limitations on the matched pair design

A

Restricting the number of variables to make matching easier
Conducting a pilot study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strengths of lab experiments

A

High internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Limitations of lab experiments

A

Participant aware if being studied - leads to them finding cues about the aims of study changing their behaviour - lowers ecological validity
IV or DV being operationalised to a degree that isn’t realistic - lowers ecological validity
Participants in unknown setting may change their behaviour- lowers ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the strengths of field experiments

A

Unaware of being observed - don’t change behaviours
Takes place is a natural setting

Higher ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are limitations to field studies

A

The IV may lack mundane realism
Can’t control extraneous variables
Ethical issues - cannot get informed consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are 3 evaluation points for natural and quasi experiments

A
  • no manipulation of the IV
    Lack of control of the IV means we cannot say for sure that the DV was caused by the IV
  • Random allocation
    You cannot have random allocation in these experiments meaning you cannot control confounding variables
  • Unique characteristics of participant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Strengths of opportunity samples

A

Easiest and quickest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Weaknesses of opportunity samples

A

Biased as drawn from small part of population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Strengths of random sample

A

Unbiased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Weaknesses of random sample

A

Need a list of all members of a population and contact them - takes time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Strengths of stratified sample

A

More representative of the population

17
Q

Weaknesses of stratified sample

A

Very time consuming as have to identify subgroups then randomly select participants and contact them

18
Q

Strengths of systematic sample

A

Unbiased as participants are selected using an objective system

19
Q

Weakness of systematic sample

A

Not truly unbiased unless you select the first person using a random method

20
Q

Strengths of volunteer sample

A

Gives access to a variety of participants which MAY make it more representative

21
Q

Weaknesses of volunteer sample

A

Volunteer bias

22
Q

Strengths of the ethical guidelines

A

The rules and sanctions if the BPS ethical guidelines gives clarity

23
Q

Weaknesses of ethical guidelines

A

The BPS guidelines are rather general as it’s impossible to cover every scenario.
Guidelines tend to cut off discussions because answers are provided
Researcher has no responsibility and they can say they followed the guidelines

24
Q

3 evaluation points on peer review

A
  • anonymity
    Being anonymous could allow for people who have personal issues or competitions to discredit people’s research
  • publication bias
    Tend to prefer positive reviews.
  • cannot deal with already publisher research