Evaluating and comparing the constitution Flashcards
What are the similarities to consider about the constitution?
- Bicameral chambers
- Representative democracies with judiciary, executive and legislature
- Executive has significant powers over military and patronage
-Both judiciaries can use judicial review: ruling ultra vires or unconstitutional
What are some of the differences to consider between the US and UK constitution?
Codification
Entrenchment
Origin: evolution v revolution
What’s the highest source of law?
Devolution v federalism
Amendment process
Head of state - monarch v president
Fusion v separation of powers
Powers and election processes of legislative houses
Can judges overturn laws?
Level of checks and balances?
Power of the cabinet compared to the PM
Similarities of federalism and devolution
- both recognise different regional identities
- both allow for policy divergence
- both are challenged by the federal government
- both have a degree of security - 10th amendment, Scottish Act 2016 and Wales Act 2017
- both rely on money from the central government
Example of more personalised policies in the UK
Scotland has higher tax for the richest, higher public spending and free tuition fees
Differences of federalism and devolution
- Federalism - states alongside, not below government v unitary state where Parliament is sovereign. This means devolved governments are more subservient and only protected by Sewel convention
- Includes all states v doesn’t include England
- Parliament could theoretically scrap devolved bodies
- States have a far greater range of powers e.g. death penalty and abortion
- Enhances separation of powers v gives a mechanism for more personalised policy
- each state has equal power v asymmetrical distribution of power
Applying structural theory to the constitutions
- codified v uncodified varies the amendment process
- Supreme courts can strike down legislation v cannot strike down legislation
- Fusion of powers v separation of powers
-Equal power of chambers differs to HOC and HOL - Both houses elected v only one house elected
Applying cultural theory to the constitutions
-US checks and balances attempt to limit power of government
-UK has power concentrated in the hands of the few and is the result of evolution - this explains outdated aspects like HOL and royal assent
-US citizens place cultural importance on constitution v UK want to leave constitutional changes to Parliament
Applying rational theory to the constitutions
- states and devolved bodies compete with central government for rights
- in both individuals can challenge government actions in court to champion their own rights
- devolution and federalism gives more powers to individuals to receive personalised policies